Steve, Bohr was only one of the small potatoes in the creation of the covert fraud, political disinformation op, of quantum mechanics. Planck was the biggest player amongst Schrodinger, Heisenberg, de Broglie, Dirac, and the whole alphabet soup of European (actually) non-physicists. http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.electronics.misc/2006-03/msg00023.html http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.electronics.misc/2006-03/msg00032.html http://theidea.bz/forum/index.php?topic=11163. 0 it's only purpose was to end, to outlaw, the study of physics, the structure and electrodynamics of the electron, superluminal proton, neutron/hydrogen atom and atomic nucleus. i.e., natural philosophy was not their path ... nor that of the whole institution of corporate 'physics' today ... with and for all our sacred relations, Millennium Twain http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=aether+%22Millennium+Twain%22 -- Steven Dufresne wrote: One thing that the new book did for me as an improvement over the paper and his first book (I've read all three that you mention below) was give a few clearer explanations. I think that in the first three quarters, before getting into the math, he was trying to give clearer layman level explanations. The fact that Dan's book review doesn't mention philosophy doesn't mean the book doesn't go into it. It does, though probably lighter than you'd like, Shakti. Not being interested in philosophy I skipped over it though. Another improvement in his new book over his first one is that he didn't make the same mistake of spending most of it explaining basic physics and quantum theory like his first one did. I see that in a lot of books. His new one assumes you know, the basics of QT and started fresh, though for it's introductory level you don't need much anyway. So for an introduction to the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) model, the new book is an improvement over the first one. For people like me who've already been introduced to it, I do wish it went further, but alas, for me there's his papers and the web. As for progress made by Milo. Let's face it, Bohr didn't come up with all of Quantum Theory. Bohr and many others over decades did. Only a handful of people are working on the WSM model. I wish there were more. Thanks for the reference to Daniel Fitzpatrick' s page below. From my quick scan it looks like I'm in for a good read. -Steve http://rimstar.org -- In NuclearStructure@yahoogroups.com, "Millennium Twain" <yonibluestar@ ...> wrote: those who have studied the foundations of physics will know that Milo Wolff is one of the best institutional physicists the corporate world has to offer. it appears, however, from the review written by Dan below, that Milo has offered nothing new, and has not explored any of the frontiers of physics, of natural philosophy, viz. the superluminal cosmos, the electromagnetic structure of the atomic nucleus ... let alone the spiritual awakening of Global Consciousness and each of us as individuals to hear and sing along with the cosmic deities and all our relations ... to indeed sing creation ourselves. Milo's previous book, too, had nothing to add to his original paper from 1993: Milo Wolff, "Fundamental Laws, Microphysics, and Cosmology," Physics Essays, V6N2, p 181- which in fact was much more detailed and informative than his later, and larger, book. in Dan's review of Milo's work, he states that Milo has done nothing more than suck up to the immense covert Physics money/power machine represented by the Planck/Schrodinger et al gangster machine. clearly, the aging Milo will do well in marketing this one ... Millennium Twain http://erg.ucd.ie/arupa/ratbag_antiphysics_rag94.html http://erg.ucd.ie/arupa/ratbag_antiphysics_rag95.html http://erg.ucd.ie/arupa/ratbag_antiphysics_rag96.html http://erg.ucd.ie/arupa/ratbag_antiphysics_rag97.html -- In amateurastronomyonl ine, "Daniel P Fitzpatrick Jr" <zeusrdx> wrote: Schrodinger' s Universe: http://www.amperefitz.com/schrodi.htm the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff ... ..