Shell wrote: << I was told f/22 for those landscapes. f/16 was an "who cares" about it type aperture. ... Hmm, these are 'sort of' true, but I personally don't...
... <http://web.295.ca/mike_graham/errata/sb800_battery_cover.htm> T.J., Many thanks for putting up the web page with instructions on how remove the SB800's...
Personally I would only ever use microdrives in my camera if I'd run out of flash cards, had nothing to upload them to, and the only shops nearby were selling...
... remove the ... I'm glad that you, and hopefully others were able to benefit from this. I found it shortly after I got my SB800. It's a good feeling to...
I think you hit the nail on the head Simon, it is very personal. What I like and think looks okay, someone else might not. ( especially my one instructor- he...
Theoretically, I believe this particular LEXAR (133X) is about 2x the speed of the Sandisk Extreme III, but I doubt you would notice any difference in actual...
... f/22 for those landscapes. ... what differences it will make. That's why short focal lengths are preferred for landscapes. You get all the DoF you'd want...
... I agree with Eddie, at least on D50/D70 I doubt you see much gain on anything above 80x. I don't have a 133x (20MB/s) Lexar Wa card, but I have - SanDisk...
... or AFC, ... cloudy, ... sRGB I or ... exposing ... How very true! For the more experienced photographers the idea of being able to tweak each of these...
Thanks all for your inputs on my question. I was particularly intrigued by T.J.'s: "I bet if you took a single NEF file, and created similar sized JPEG files...
I just don't know which to go with. I love photographing wildlife, and the 70-200 VR ED is about the best there is. On the other hand, the 20-200 VR ED DX is...
I don't know what it was. I notice that almost all the photos from this one day have them, some worse than others. I have posted 2 of the photos in my gallery:...
Interesting that we have all of these "things", adjustments to deal with. I have been in photography for quite a few years and have seen the changes made. To...
... It sounds like you made up your mind, but you're leaving out an important specification. The 70-200 VR is a constant f2.8 while the 18-200 is f3.5-5.6....
... It looks like high ISO noise. ISO Auto turned on? Otherwise I can't imagine how else you could get that shot with settings of f9 1/2000 and ISO 200....
Shell wrote: << ... They both look like noise induced by underexposure to me. What metering mode were you in? They are both taken at ISO 200, F9 and 1/2000...
T, While there are certainly some fantastic photographers shooting with the latest gear (ok, got that out of the way), I fully agree with your point. ...
Simon, Thank you for the help. I certainly appreciate it. I think it was Matrix metering. It was at sunset, cloudy +3, RAW I let the camera select the shutter...
... Easy choice: go with the heavier lense. You have a better fighting chance if the wildlife decides to attack :-) No seriously, a friend of mine has a 70-200...
Scott, That is exactly what is frustrating about this new techonlogy. You get one thing corrected and another is missed. Consequently, looking at your finished...
ISO was 200, I rarely change it from there. Shooting RAW- I have shot RAW at concerts in low light, and Rodeo's, cranking the ISO up to 800 even 1600- I have...
Quite honestly, there's simply no comparison. I've owned a 24-120 VR and I've tried on the 18-200 VR in a store locally. They're both great everyday ...
I have answered this thread a couple of times. After hitting send, I remembered something I read a long time ago. This was in a column written in one of the...
Okay, I went back to look at ALL the shots I took of my sunlight/ dark tree. 1/2 have the noise. 1/2 look fine. All taken within a 2 minute period. Same lens...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
