Energy is transformation of tensors in time & space Basicaly is
transfered in 3 ways as Earthquake mechanics act , the Media reacts
as this energy is transfered resulting in transformation of the
media or beyond the media ..

Sono - acustic LAW also aplies to RF and beyond RF (light) and avove
light speed .

The universe is Autotrogoegocratic (self substaining torus loop) in
infinite expansion.

Hector


--- In NuclearStructure@yahoogroups.com, "realscnc" <realscnc@m...>
wrote:
> Waves
>
> I would like to follow the logic of the many theories that
abound in
> the scientific community. However, the inconsistent analysis of
> "Waves" drives me bonkers - "Waves are the source of everything",
> "this is a frequency universe" Just what is a wave???? It is
nothing
> more than a movement of a something, otherwise it is a nothing. It
> must have a cause - a movement of a something causes a rhythmic
> movement of a something else. A wave exists only if it involves a
> movement of a something.
> Yes the phi-waves are there all the time. They are the
result of the
> circular orbit of the electrons around the nuclei. As long as they
> remain circular they are essentially meaningless as you suggested.
It
> is only when the orbit is distorted by an exterior force that it
has
> the opportunity to communicate that distortion of orbit
by "Radiation"
> to other orbiting electrons. We must step back and realize that
there
> is energy only when it is communicated. This analysis of energy by
> `kinetic or potential' although useful for engineering purposes is
> meaningless for science. Although we are aware of the potential for
> the radiation of energy in a bomb of uranium or plutonium for
> engineering purposes should we for scientific purposes treat it as
> potential energy? No! The same argument would apply for a mixture
of
> sulfur, carbon and nitrate in gun powder, or carbon and oxygen in a
> heater.
>
>
> The commoditization of energy was one of many serious errors
of
> science. The potential for the radiation of energy is not inherent
in
> the materials. A plutonium bomb only works if the quantity and
shape
> are properly manipulated, the ingredients of gun powder are only
> explosive if properly mixed in the correct proportions. The same
> analysis applies to the potential energy of position relative to
> gravity. For scientific purposes it is meaningless to impart to a
> material or to its surroundings on any other pretext a potential
> energy of acceleration due to gravity. Any energy output will be
> related to the surrounding gravity forces at any particular time. A
> variable and undefined quantity.
> The above analysis is not meant to denigrate the analysis of
specific
> circumstance for engineering purposes which obviously are very
useful.
> However, I think it would serve both engineering and science to
> eliminate the mysticism surrounding energy.
> Cheers
> Bob