Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
OAGI-CoreComponents · OAGI Core Components Work Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
[Fwd: TBG17 Management overview]   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #453 of 467 |
FYI

Stig Korsgaard wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> For some time we (TBG17 management) have tried to compile some information
that could give you a reasonable overview of where TBG17 is and how we are
progressing with our workload, which seems to increase week by week.
>
> As you know we have produced most of our key documents in a version 1.0. That
includes the rules and procedures under which TBG17 work, the guidelines and
procedures for submissions and harmonization work and the templates/checklists.
>
> We have also released the first set of Core Components that although labelled
"the first 19" actually is much more while they in total contains 19 ACC´s and
186 BCC´s. We still miss the change request template to amend these, but it is
on its way.
>
> In terms of submissions we still have 9 "active" submissions meaning they have
official status and is being processed. A couple of submissions is withdrawn due
to them being outdated and superseded by new versions in their respective
domains. This is even true for others of the active ones, but as we all know
natural in a period of time where everybody both TBG17 and the (potential)
submitters has been in a learning phase, where even basic concepts has
developed. We should though be passed that now and it is expected that in our
next meeting TBG17 will address the first BIE's in addition to the CC´s. And
once they come, the new submissions will just add so much richer to the
harmonization.
>
> Let this by the way be a reminder that we still very much would like to
receive new submissions. The more the better for the final harmonized result.
>
> In terms of progressing the current submissions TBG17 editorial team have
produced a version of our CC´s in a combined spreadsheet (attached) that not
only contains the released set of CC´s but also the next draft and the related
set of CC´s, which we will worked upon in our next meeting. Note that the draft
set says draft 39, but it is correctly 38.
> <<related versus 19 and 38.xls>>
> In addition there has also been produced a spreadsheet that shows how the
current three different set of CC´s (the released, draft and related) is divided
in relation to the submitters, meaning what part of the different submissions is
covered by the different batches of CC´s. This also shows - interpreted in
another way - what the completion rate is or will be.
> <<20041129PercentComplete.xls>>
> Note that the percentages is estimates, but fairly close.
>
> Note also that even if TBG17 operates on the basis of processing submissions
on a "first in - first out basis", we also have the need to be efficient meaning
that similar concepts will get
> processed at the same time at the meetings.
>
> If you wonder why some of the CC´s is attributed to TBG17 it is because it is
either the harmonized result of our work or because some of the things have been
combined between submitters and raised to a TBG17 level. Finally there is also a
few of examples where we have had the need to add BCC´s - based on submissions
but not in there as such. This in order to make ACC´s complete.
>
> All this means that we are still some time away from progressing a full
concept in terms of a message, but actually this is more due to the fact that we
have had the need to get a pretty good idea of what the CC´s are and populate
the library before we could or can go to the BIE level, which essentially is the
level that is the important one for the users. Furthermore in order to progress
a message we are still missing the document assembly part, that is missing in
CCTS and yet to be developed.
>
> On other statistics TBG17 now have 20 voting members + 2 general members and
there are still a number of potential groups missing. We also have an increased
number of requests from especially other CEFACT PG to work with them and it is
very difficult for TBG17 to use resources for that while at the same time needs
so heavily to focus on the harmonization. In essence a number of these request
are as much the responsibility of the full TBG, but more on that later.
>
> In order not to make this message to long, I will leave the report here, but
if you have any questions please contact me.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Stig Korsgaard
> TBG17 Chair
> M.Sc.E Standardisation Manager
> Tel: +45 3370 1083
> Cell: +45 2725 9083
> Mail: stk@...
>
> Danish Bankers Association
> Amaliegade 7
> DK-1256 Copenhagen K
> Tel: 3370 1000
> Fax: 3393 0260
> mail@...
> www.finansraadet.dk
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: related versus 19 and 38.xls
> related versus 19 and 38.xls Type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet
(application/vnd.ms-excel)
> Encoding: base64
> Description: related versus 19 and 38.xls
>
> Name: 20041129PercentComplete.xls
> 20041129PercentComplete.xls Type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet
(application/vnd.ms-excel)
> Encoding: base64
> Description: 20041129PercentComplete.xls
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to un-cefact-tbg17 as:
garret.minakawa@....
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
leave-un-cefact-tbg17-52261O@...


Fri Dec 3, 2004 5:09 pm

gminakaw
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #453 of 467 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

FYI...
Garret Minakawa
gminakaw
Offline Send Email
Dec 3, 2004
5:15 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help