Robin,
OAGi is now a full voting member of ATG2 and is also an Editor of the ATG2 NDR. We provided many comments into the Draft 1.0 NDR and worked with ATG2 to better align Draft 1.1 NDR with OAGIS 9.0.
The soon to be released OAGIS 9.0 NDR will reference the ATG2 NDR extensively and every effort has been made to adopt ATG2 rules. In some cases, however, there are still differences between ATG2 and OAGIS 9.0. We hope to get these differences worked out over time.
If you have any questions about this or require some additional details, please let me know.
Regards,
garret
----- Original Message -----From: Robin CoverSent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:57 AMSubject: [OAGI-CoreComponents] Alignment of ATG2, UBL, and OAGIS on NDR (?)Garret (or anyone)...
Notices have been posted about the approval of the OASIS UBL
NDR, UN/CEFACT XML Naming and Design Rules [Step 6 of the ODP -
Implementation Verification], and DON XML Naming and Design Rules 2.0
Can someone provide an updated summary statement describing
the alignment of OAGIS (CCT Schema Module definitions and
other features) with any of these 'NDR' (draft) documents?
Anything short and sweet (one sentence) will be adequate,
but I'd like to quote it in a news item. If anyone feels
motivated to provide a 1-2 paragraph description for public
use, that would be welcome too.
Garret Minakawa had written earlier (Sep 14, 2004) relative to
the ATG2 working group session on OAGi comments for
ATG2 NDR Draft 1.0:
<q>... these changes will now bring ATG2, UBL, and OAGIS into virtually
100% alignment for the CCT Schema Module definitions...</q>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OAGI-CoreComponents/message/398
Many thanks,
Robin Cover
XML Cover Pages
http://xml.coverpages.org/
robin.cover@...
Offline 
Send Email