Surely this is incorrect?

>> a: has [b c] [ print b print c]
>> a
none
none
>> a/local 3 4
3
4

Surely local words default value should be unset
until they are defined?

Also in the second case is it correct to be
able to pass values to local words in this manner?

How is the above different from this....

>> use [b c] [print b print c]
** Script Error: b has no value
** Near: print b print c

Can somebody please explain the wisdom of this
or is it a bug?

cheers,

Mark Dickson