Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Oregon_against_NAIS
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1423 - 1430 of 1430   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#1430 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:23 am
Subject: Fw: Tell the USDA: Step up meat safety checks for school lunches
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hmm, not sure if signing this petition will encourage them on NAIS or not... Thoughts?

Thanks,
Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "Adam Klaus, CREDO Action" <act@...>
To: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 12:54:18 PM
Subject: Tell the USDA: Step up meat safety checks for school lunches


CREDO Action | more than a network. a movement.


School lunch meat is less safe than fast food.

Your message to Secretary Vilsack:

It is unacceptable that USDA standards for school lunch meat purchases do not match, or exceed, the fast food industry's standards. We, the undersigned, demand that you immediately order the Agricultural Marketing Service to implement emergency measures to increase testing for pathogens. Within 60 days, the AMS should have in place standards and testing procedures that meet or exceed those of industry-leader Jack in the Box.

Clicking here will add your name to the petition.

School lunch food safety gets an 'F'

It's hard to believe, but hamburgers from McDonald's and Jack in the Box are safer than the meat that America's 31 million children are offered at our nation's schools.

Each year the USDA buys some 100 million pounds of beef for America's school lunch program — but the USDA refuses to adopt common-sense practices to ensure that meat served to our children is safe.

A recent investigation by USA Today1 found that the meat sold to U.S. school cafeterias faces less testing and lower safety standards than the meat that's served in most fast-food restaurants — outlets that aren't otherwise known for their health consciousness and are as cost-conscious as the most passionate deficit hawk.

That's right: McDonalds, KFC, and Jack in the Box test the ground beef they buy five to 10 times more frequently than the USDA tests beef for U.S. school lunches! And these restaurants have for years refused to buy certain kinds of lower-quality meat and chicken which the USDA continues to accept.

The USDA needs to act immediately to protect our children's health. Click here to automatically sign the petition today.

Despite assurances of safety from Rayne Pegg, head of the Agricultural Marketing Services, the USDA agency responsible for school lunch meat purchases, scientists and experts agree that there is no excuse for the USDA's lax standards. Even the USDA used to agree! As far back as 2000, the USDA Secretary under Bill Clinton vowed to rectify this unacceptable policy. Then the Bush administration took office and Big Meat (AKA the meat industry) used its influence to kill any hope of reform. Until now.

Admirably, current Secretary Tom Vilsack has agreed to "an independent review" of USDA safety standards for school lunch meat. But that is not nearly enough. With tens of millions of pounds of contaminated meat recalled over the past two years, it's only a matter of time before these low standards lead to a school cafeteria outbreak and sickened children. The possibility is unacceptable.

Tell Secretary Tom Vilsack that our children need immediate, emergency action to make sure that the food they eat each day is the safest possible!

Thank you for working to build a better world.

Adam Klaus, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets

1 www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-12-08-school-lunch-standards_N.htm



Find us on Facebook Did you know CREDO has a Facebook page?
Click here to check it out!


© 2009 CREDO. All rights reserved.
Get action alerts on your mobile phone! Click here to join CREDO Mobile Action; we'll text you on important issues when your voice is urgently needed in Congress.

This is a message from CREDO / Working Assets. To change your email address or update your contact info, please visit: http://act.credoaction.com/subscrip/coa.html?id=6988-226806-KRDAC_x

To remove yourself (Sharlyn Homola) from this list, please visit our subscription management page at: http://act.credoaction.com/s?i=6988-226806-KRDAC_x



#1429 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Mon Dec 7, 2009 10:10 pm
Subject: Fw: [NoNAIS.org] NAIS is Contagious
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I guess the USDA doesn't take a Holiday when it comes to NAIS, and neither should we. Keep up the good fight. Our animals and our livelihood depend on our action!

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: walterj <walterj@...>
To: walterj@...
Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 12:20:22 PM
Subject: [NoNAIS.org] NAIS is Contagious


NoNAIS.org has posted a new item, 'NAIS is Contagious'
You may view the latest post at
http://NoNAIS.org/2009/12/07/nais-is-contagious/

(Since this is a text email the text below will lack formatting and linking. I
have switched from summary to full text due to server failures at VONetwork, my
web hosting provider, causing loss of articles.)

From Doreen Hannes:

Interestingly enough, it's Pearl Harbor Day---and so it is for Cattle
12/7/09
Doreen Hannes

Last week I heard from someone who works at several sale barns in the area that
one was currently tagging all breeding cows with 840 NAIS tags if they did not
have the metal brucellosis tag in their ears. As of January [...]

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted. If you would like to stop receiving this email then go to
http://NoNAIS.org and enter your email address in the "Get NoNAIS News" field
near the top of the right sidebar. Click on the "remove" button and then click
the "Send" button to remove yourself from the mailing list.
Cheers,
walterj
walterj@...


#1428 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Sat Dec 5, 2009 5:57 am
Subject: Fw: [naisfromtheshorsesmouth] NAIS Pages Back Up
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
FYI from another list...

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----
Subject: [naisfromtheshorsesmouth] NAIS Pages Back Up

The NAIS pages are back up, many of them listed as modified today.  Still says voluntary (for now).
This one is quite interesting.  I don't have time to go through the rest as we are leaving shortly for a long awaited medical consultation for my husband.  Make sure you download the list of compliant ATD's.  Horse owners note GlobalVetLink is on the list - that is who almost all our CVI's come through.  (There may still be a few vets out there using the old paper forms but they are fewer and fewer.)
Karen
http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/animal_track/index.shtml
The final NAIS component, animal tracing, is available through several Animal Tracking Databases (ATDs) maintained by States and private industry. This component of NAIS is one that still requires the most development, as a lot of data collection infrastructure will need to be put in place at markets and other locations. However, producers already have access to several ATDs for reporting the movement of animals that are shipped from or moved into their premises.
Movements within a production unit for management purposes (e.g., from pasture to pasture) are not ones that impact disease spread, and therefore are not necessary to report relative to NAIS. State and private industry animal tracking databases (ATDs) will hold the animal location and movement records that producers report. When there is a disease outbreak or other animal health event, the ATDs provide timely, accurate reports that show where potentially exposed animals have been and what other animals have come into contact with them.
Choosing an Animal Tracking Database
Participating producers will select either a State- or industry-operated ATD for reporting animal movements. Animal health officials receive movement records from ATDs only if a disease or animal health event occurs. View a list of compliant ATDs (PDF; 53KB).
Reporting Animal Movements
The NAIS Species Working Groups, in collaboration with animal health officials, are developing recommendations for the specific types of movements that should be reported to an ATD - those movements that pose the greatest potential to impact the spread of diseases for each species. Instructions on how to report animal movements will vary depending on the ATD selected by the producer.
Why You Should Participate
Once the animal tracing component is complete, there are several important points to consider when choosing whether to participate:
Animal tracing information makes it easier for producers, States, industry, and USDA to determine the scope of a disease or animal health event and locate infected animals.
Federal and state animal health officials will receive animal location and movement records only if a disease or animal health event - such as an outbreak of avian influenza or bovine tuberculosis - occurs.


#1427 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Thu Dec 3, 2009 2:16 am
Subject: Monsanto withdrawing from new GMO-corn commodity
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hmm, interesting:

http://en.greenplanet.net/food/gmo/1142-the-giant-steps-back-on-two-gmos-why.html

I apologize if you have already seen it.

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR



#1426 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Wed Dec 2, 2009 6:31 am
Subject: Fw: 100 Organizations Call on USDA and Congress to End NAIS!
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
FYI

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance <judith@...>
To: "charli_horse@..." <charli_horse@...>
Sent: Tue, November 24, 2009 5:31:37 PM
Subject: 100 Organizations Call on USDA and Congress to End NAIS!

100 Organizations Call on USDA and Congress to End NAIS!
Having trouble viewing this email? Please click here Forward to a Friend
To ensure delivery, please add judith@... to your address book. SmartUnsubscribesm




For Immediate Release
   11/24/2009







100 Organizations Urge Ag Secretary, Congress to Spend $5.3 Million Appropriated for NAIS to Kill It

Austin, TX -- A 100-group coalition sent letters to Congress and the U.S. Department of Agriculture urging that the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) be halted.  The groups urged Congress and the USDA to “support the limited use of NAIS funding to shut down the program, and to refocus the agency on measures that truly improve animal health and that respect the interests of both livestock owners and consumers.”

In the 2010 Agriculture Appropriations Bill, Congress reduced NAIS funding to $5.3 million, but did not specify how those funds were to be allocated.

“We respectfully request that the USDA recognize the fundamental flaws in NAIS and the public opposition to the program, and not use the $5.3 million appropriated for NAIS to further advance, in any way, this program,” states the letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

Instead, the 100 groups recommend that USDA expressly limit the use of the funds to pay the costs associated with winding down the program, including formally withdrawing all pending rulemaking initiated by the agency to advance NAIS and satisfying existing contractual obligations.

“We urge this course of action because, contrary to its stated purposes, NAIS will not address animal disease or food safety problems,” the letter to Congress states. “Instead, NAIS imposes high costs and paperwork burdens on family farmers and creates incentives for corporate-controlled confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and vertically integrated systems. This ill-conceived and badly implemented program should be halted.”

The letter to Congress outlined several reasons why the program will not address animal disease or food safety problems including: 

  1. NAIS will not prevent foodborne illnesses from e. coli or salmonella, because the contamination occurs at the slaughterhouse, while NAIS tracking ends at the time of slaughter.
  2. USDA has made unsupported assertions that our country needs 48-hour traceback of all animal movements for disease control, yet has failed to provide any scientific basis support this claim.
  3. Unfair reporting and paperwork burdens would be placed on family farms and sustainable livestock operations.
  4. The costs of complying with NAIS will be unreasonably burdensome for small farmers and many other animal owners.

The letters are posted at http://farmandranchfreedom.org/content/federal-updates 

The letters were coordinated by the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance and the signors include:

Acres USA; Adopt a Farm Family; American Goat Society; American Grassfed Assn.; American Indian Horse Registry; American Policy Center; American Raw Milk Producers Pricing Assn.; Arkansas Animal Producers Assn.; Bluebonnet Equine Human Society; California Farmers Union; Carolina Farm Stewardship Assn.; Cattlemen’s Texas Longhorn Registry; Chez Panisse; Citizens for Private Property Rights (Mo.); Colorado Independent CattleGrowers Assn.; Community Farm Alliance (Ky.); Constitutional Alliance; The Cornucopia Institute; Dakota Resource Council; Dakota Rural Action; Davis Mountain Trans Pecos Heritage Assn. (Texas); Edible Austin; Edible San Marcos (Texas); Empire State Family Farm Alliance (N.Y.); Equus Survival Trust; Fair Food Matters (Mich.); Family Farm Defenders; Farm Aid; Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance; Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund; Farmers Union of Adams County (N.D.); Food & Water Watch; Food for Maine’s Future; Freedom 21; Gun Owners of America; Idaho Rural Council; Independent Cattlemen of Iowa; Independent Cattlemen of Nebraska; Independent Beef Assn. of North Dakota; Innovative Farmers of Ohio; International Texas Longhorn Assn.; Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement; Kansas Cattlemen’s Assn.; Land Stewardship Project (Minn.); Local Harvest; Main Alternative Agriculture Assn.; Main Organic Farmers and Gardeners Assn.; Marshall County Citizens for Property Rights (Ala.); Massachusetts Smallholders Alliance; Michigan Farmers Union; Michigan Land Trustees; Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance; Mississippi Livestock Markets Assn.; Missouri Rural Crisis Center; Missourians for Local Control; Monroe/LaCrosse County Farmers Union (Wis.); Montana Cattlemen’s Assn.; Montana Farmer s Union; National Association of Farm Animal Welfare; National Family Farm Coalition; Nat’l. Latino Farmers & Ranchers Trade Assn.; Nebraska Sustainable Agriculture Society; North Carolina Contract Poultry Growers Assn.; Northeast Organic Farming Assn.--Conn.; Northeast Organic Farming Assn.--Mass.; Northeast Organic Farming Assn.—New Hampshire; Northeast Organic Farming Assn.—New York; Northeast Organic Farming Assn. -- Vermont; Northeast Organic Farming Assn. Interstate Council; Northern Illinois Draft Horse and Mule Assn.; Northern New Mexico Stockman’s Assn.; Northern Plains Resource Council (Mont.); Ohio Farmers Union; Oregon Livestock Producers Assn.; Oregon Rural Action; Organic Consumers Assn.; Organization for Competitive Markets; Ozarks Property Rights Congress (Mo.); Paso Fino Horse Assn.; Powder River Basin Resource Council (Wyo.); Progressive Agriculture Organization (Pa.); Property Rights Congress; R-CALF USA; Regional Farm and Food Project (N.Y.); Rocky Mountain Farmer s Union; Secure Arkansas; Small Farmer’s Journal; Small Farms Conservancy; South Dakota Stockgrowers Assn.; Sovereignty International; Stop Real ID Coalition; Sustainable Food Center (Texas); Texas Landowners Council; Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Assn.; US Boer Goat Assn.; Virginia Independent Consumers & Farmers Assn.; Virginia Land Rights Coalition; Western Organization of Resource Councils; Weston A. Price Foundation; and, Wintergarden Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (Texas).
 
# # #







Contact:

Judith McGeary
Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
Phone: 512-243-9404
Toll-free: 866-687-6452









Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, PO Box 809, Cameron, TX 76520  512-243-9404




Forward to a Friend
SmartUnsubscribesm
This email was sent to charli_horse@... by judith@...
Update Profile/Email Address | SmartUnsubscribesm from this list | Privacy Policy


#1425 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:34 am
Subject: Fw: [Christians_against_NAIS] VeriChip changes name to PositiveID - buys Steel Vault Corp- and a tic more
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
FYI from another list...

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----

This is important, folks. I thought everyone should be aware of the acquisition and name change of Verichip...see below.

 We have a number of issues arising simultaneously in the technology sector to aid in the full control of individuals. This will be on our doorstep before very long with a agency doing the enforcement......Ugh! Senate Bill 510 was moved out of committee today, and it looks to go the senate floor very quickly. This is the establishment of international guidelines in the United States. This puts us under Codex and the OIE and the IPPC. Big trouble for all production agriculture. Small, large and medium.

This weekend, I will have Don Casey, author of "The Dangers of Sustainable Agriculture" and a number of other pieces on the implementation of Agenda 21 on my radio show. Hopefully, the next weekend I will be able to have Carl Sanders on the show. He helped to develop the implantable microchip, and then was saved and became an evangelist.
Doreen

Listen to my radio show, Truth Farmer, every Saturday from 5-6pm Central time on libertynewsradio.com beginning October 3rd....

Also check out www.newswithviews.com for my articles and many other excellent researchers on topics affecting your freedom...also my blog, www.truth-farmer.blogspot.com

"It's dangerous to be right when your government is wrong"==Voltaire

ALERT

VeriChip purchases Steel Vault Corp. and changes its name to: PositiveID

 

 

“VeriChip has a new name.  The company famous for its development of RFID tags that can be implanted in humans has acquired Steel Vault Corporation, a provider of identity security products and services.  Anti-identity-theft meet human microchipping. Together, VeriChip Corp and Steel Vault Corp are forming a new company called PositiveID.”  – Koinonia House

 

 

News release source: http://www.news-medical.net/news/20091111/VeriChip-announces-the-completion-of-Steel-Vault-acquisition.aspx

 

VeriChip announces the completion of Steel Vault acquisition

11. November 2009 00:29

 

VeriChip Corporation (NASDAQ:CHIP) ("VeriChip"), a provider of radio frequency identification (RFID) systems for healthcare and patient-related needs, and Steel Vault Corporation (OTCBB:SVUL) ("Steel Vault"), a premier provider of identity security products and services, announced today that VeriChip has completed its acquisition of Steel Vault to provide unique health and security identification tools to protect consumers and businesses.  In conjunction with the merger, VeriChip has changed its name to PositiveID ("PositiveID" or the "Company").

PositiveID represents the convergence of a pioneer in personal health records and the first and only FDA-cleared implantable microchip for patient identification, VeriChip, with a leader in the identity security space, Steel Vault, focused on access and security of consumers' critical data.

PositiveID will initially operate primarily in two areas: HealthID and ID Security.  HealthID will focus on bringing innovative health solutions to consumers and businesses based on the Company's intellectual property, specifically a rapid virus detection system for the H1N1 virus and other forms of pandemic viruses, and an in vivo glucose-sensing RFID microchip, both of which are currently under development with partner RECEPTORS LLC.  The Company will also offer its Health Link personal health record to help consumers manage their health records online.  Through its ID Security segment, the Company will offer identity theft protection and related services including credit monitoring and reporting through its NationalCreditReport.com website.

Under terms of the agreement and plan of reorganization, Steel Vault stockholders will receive 0.5 shares of VeriChip common stock for every share of Steel Vault common stock held.  The outstanding stock options and warrants of Steel Vault will also be converted at the same ratio.  No fractional shares of VeriChip common stock will be issued in connection with the proposed merger. Instead, VeriChip will make a cash payment to each Steel Vault stockholder who would otherwise receive a fractional share.  This merger is a stock–for–stock transaction, and is expected to be a tax free exchange.

Commenting on the transaction, Scott R. Silverman, Chairman and CEO of PositiveID, stated, "In joining these two companies, we believe we are better positioned to accelerate the development of our exciting diagnostic and sensor applications such as glucose-sensing, as well as our rapid virus detection system for the H1N1 virus and other pandemic viruses.  By moving beyond the original patient identification application of our implantable RFID microchip technology, we believe that we will be able to get high-value products to market faster with a more efficient use of capital."

Silverman continued, "From a financial standpoint, we believe the merger has made us stronger by eliminating the duplicative costs of running two public companies.  Furthermore, we are fully-funded to develop the glucose-sensing microchip and the rapid virus detection system and have no debt."

Source: VeriChip Corporation

Related Links:

 • PositiveID Corporation Changes Ticker Symbol to PSID and Unveils New Logo - PositiveID
 • VeriChip Present RFID Microchip and Virus Triage Detection System for the H1N1 Virus - MoreRFID
 • RFID Makes Slow And Steady Progress - InformationWeek
 • VeriChip TV Ad Confirms Critics' Fears: They Want Everyone Implanted - BNET

 

 

 

 





#1424 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:53 am
Subject: Fw: Food Safety - Congress Loses Its Way
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Let's keep sending those emails and making calls. Don't let them think we don't care!

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Citizens for Health <info@...>
To: charli_horse@...
Sent: Mon, November 16, 2009 5:19:09 PM
Subject: Food Safety - Congress Loses Its Way

Citizens.org

Dear Supporter,

This Wednesday, November 18th, the U.S. Senate plans to consider a massive "food safety" bill entitled "The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act".

This bill (S. 510) will strengthen the forces that for the past fifty years have led to unsafe, nutritionally compromised food and will undermine growing efforts working to thwart those forces. (To read the bill and view co-sponsors, go to www.thomas.loc.gov and enter "Food Safety Modernization Act" in the search field).

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial". The Senate's food safety initiative, though intended to be beneficial, follows the House version by leading food down the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "modernization" path that Congress designed for drugs. (This House version, H.R. 2749, has the same drawbacks and originally failed; later in the same week it was passed under different rules).

Click here to send a letter to your Senators urging them to amend or oppose S. 510!

The FDA's drug modernization approach places high-cost drugs at the heart of a dangerously costly health system, contributes to thousands of drug-related deaths, and leads to the approval of many unsafe drugs that end up being recalled. It also makes FDA drug regulation perilously dependent on the financial support the agency receives from drug company fees.

S. 510 - in keeping with this flawed drug modernization path - gives powerful incentives to large, concentrated food manufacturers (the sources of the most significant threats to our food so far) while undercutting producers that are smaller, safer, and often local.

Today Citizens for Health launches its food safety campaign and our first goal is to amend or defeat S 510. If the bill passes without any meaningful, substantive changes, we will seek a Presidential Veto. If the bill that is finally signed fails to address our concerns sufficiently we will work to establish and implement regulations to minimize the negative impact on food safety that will surely result, and we will redouble our efforts to maximize the food choices and food and health information available to all.

And, remember: we are not opposing food safety. We are working to advance it by opposing misguided attempts to build a flawed, drug-like bureaucratic structure on top of a crumbling food safety foundation that desperately needs to be shored up and repaired.

We need your help to win - click here and send your letter to your Senators now!

During this process we will regularly address key food safety issues and the food safety decisions we make - as a nation and as individuals - that shape our lives. It is essential that we all have the opportunity to understand how these issues and decisions affect our ability to trust our food supply. In a very real sense we, as a nation, are what we eat.

We welcome a robust discourse - here at Citizens.org, in your community, and in policy. And, ultimately, we all look forward to safer, healthier, more trustworthy food.

On a final note, consider this remark by Mark Twain: "No man's life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session." Now is the time to act to minimize the damage that will result from passage of S. 510.

I thank you for staying involved in this discourse and look forward to hearing from you. Take a moment to share your comments at blogcomments@..., and don't forget to click here now to send a letter to your Senators urging them to oppose or overhaul S. 510.

James S. Turner, Esq.

Board Chair

Citizens for Health




#1423 From: Sharlyn Homola <charli_horse@...>
Date: Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:00 am
Subject: Fw: FTCLDF Alert about Senate Food Safety Bill
charli_horse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
FYI: Contact your Senators!

Sharlyn
 
Homola Horse Haven
Umpqua, OR


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: FTCLDF President <president@...>
To: charli_horse@...
Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 9:52:49 AM
Subject: FTCLDF Alert about Senate Food Safety Bill


In This Issue
Problems with the Bill
Actions to Take
Quick Links
 
Join/Donate/Renew

Join FTCLDF
 
Join Our Mailing List
Dear Sharlyn,
                                                    November 10, 2009 
The debate on food safety is heating up in Congress!  The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) is planning to mark up S. 510, the Senate version of the draconian House food safety bill (H.R. 2749).  This is a major step towards passing the bill.
 
Big Ag and Big Food have distributed melamine-contaminated milk from China and salmonella-contaminated peppers from Mexico.  Yet Congress hasn't gotten the message that they need to solve the real problems - the centralized food distribution system and imported foods - and not regulate our local food sources out of business.  We need your help to make them listen!  Please read through the problems with the bill and then call your Senators (details below).
PROBLEMS WITH THE BILL

1. The bill applies to all food, not just food in interstate commerce.  On its face, the bill applies to any farm or food producer, regardless of location, size, or scope of distribution.  If the intent truly is to limit the bill to food that is crossing state lines, then it must be amended.  And even then, the bill would still negatively impact small farmers and food processors who live near state lines and who cross state lines to reach local farmers markets and co-ops.

2. The major foodborne illness outbreaks and recalls have all been caused by the large, industrial food system.  Small, local food producers have not contributed to the highly publicized outbreaks. Yet S. 510 subjects the small, local food system to the same, broad federal regulatory oversight that would apply to the industrial food system. 

3. FDA regulation of local food processors is unnecessary and overly burdensome. Federal regulations may be needed for industrial, large-scale processing facilities that source raw ingredients from multiple locations (sometimes imported from other countries) and ship their products across the country, but federal regulation is overkill for small, local processors.  Existing state and local public health laws are enough for local food sources.

4. Relying on HACCP will harm small processors.  S. 510 applies a complex and burdensome Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system to even the smallest local food processors.  Although HACCP may be good in theory a good theory for large, complex facilities, USDA's implementation of HACCP, with its requirements to develop and maintain extensive records, has already proven to be an overwhelming burden for a significant number of small, regional meat processors across the country.  In the meat industry, HACCP has substituted paperwork review for independent inspections of large meatpacking plants, while sanctioning small processors for paperwork violations that posed no health threat.  Applying a HACCP system to small, local foods processors could drive them out of business, reducing consumers' options to buy fresh, local foods.

5. FDA does not belong on the farm. S. 510 calls for FDA regulation of how farms grow and harvest produce.  Given the agency's track record, it is likely that the regulations will discriminate against small, organic, and diversified farms.  The House version of the bill directs FDA to consider the impact of its rulemaking on small-scale and diversified farms, but there are no enforceable limits or protections for small diversified and organic farms from inappropriate and burdensome federal rules. 

6. S. 510 favors foreign farms and producers over domestic. The bill creates incentives for retailers to import more food from other countries, because it burdens family farms and small business and because it will be practically impossible to hold foreign food facilities to the same standards and inspections.  The bill will create a considerable competitive disadvantage for ALL U.S. agriculture and food production (see analysis at http://ftcldf.org/news/news-20Oct2009-2.html ).
 

 
ACTION TO TAKE:

1.  Contact both of your U.S. Senators.  Ask to speak to the staffer who handles food safety issues and if you are able to speak to them rely on the talking points above to explain the problems with the bill.  If you get their voice mail, leave this message:

"I am a resident of _____.  I am opposed to S. 510 because it will place unnecessary and burdensome regulations on our small farms and local food processors.  Contrary to FDA's testimony, the bill is not limited to food in interstate commerce.  In addition, it does not address the root cause of foodborne illnesses, i.e., a centralized food system, and it will impact small and local producers.  I urge Senator __ to take every action possible to stop unlimited FDA power from destroying our local food sources.  Please call me back at _______"


To find contact information for your Senators, go to www.congress.org or call the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121.

2.  Also contact the Chair and Ranking Member of the HELP Committee: Chairman Harkin, (p): 202-224-0767,
(f): 202-224-5128

Senator Enzi, Ranking Member, (p): 202-224-6770




Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund | 8116 Arlington Blvd., Suite 263 | Falls Church | VA | 22042


Messages 1423 - 1430 of 1430   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help