Thanks for that Olavi, was too rushed to find it for myself.

Robert, personally feel your paper may be important, and also,
bearing in mind Olavi's points feel that it exemplifies the first
of two possible approaches -

i) for those who want a theoretical and inspirational entry
method - call it an "access technique"

(but the other route might be for Olavi)

ii) the data sifting or "objective step by step" method - the
problem here is there is so much automatic and unconsidered
dismissal by those who _should_ be assessing things more
impartially and scientifically -
the only place I know of doing impartial work (and finding
positive results and making data available) is the P.E.A.R group
of Princeton

best wishes
Ray D

Olavi Kiviniemi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It is nice there is still some life in this forum.
>
> Robert Searle:
>
> > PLEASE KINDLY COMMENT ON MY RESEARCH PIECE AT THIS LINK
> > http://kheper.net/Multi-Dimensional_Science.html
>
> Well, the link did not work, but I found the article/paper here:
> http://kheper.net/essays/Multi-Dimensional_Science.html