> We are not doing anything or accepting technic or
> scientific partner on this side of our world

Then this is not a scientific endeavor you are undertaking. I have
been under the impression that this is a scientific message board. As
such, this seems, to me at least, a little inappropriately placed.
Perhaps this would have been more appropriate on a metaphysical
message board.

Since nothing in your plan indicates a means of verifying or
replicating the 'data' you obtain by doing this, it seems fair to say
that you will not succeed in convincing any scientist on Earth that
whatever you find is genuine. Furthermore, these dubious 'entities'
you claim to be working with, even if real, are not necessarily
reliable. I forget who it was that said "just because they're dead
doesn't make them smart", but you can change out the word 'dead' for
'nonphysical' or 'extraterrestrial' or 'extradimensional' and the
statement is just as true (and I should add that, apart from not
necessarily being smart, these entities are not necessarily honest
either).

I guess that your goal in all of this is to try to push forward the
"enlightenment of humanity", unless I have misunderstood you (which
is, of course, possible, and please correct me if in any way I have
misunderstood you). Many Parapsychologists share the same goal, but
try to approach the issue from a solid basis in reality. Outside
ideas and support, even criticisms, are encouraged, both for
scientific reasons (because the scientific process demands dialogue,
what philosophers of science call the 'great conversation'), and for
more principled reasons (to remain humble and open to new ideas, to
ensure the openness and honesty of the process, etc...). Scientists
are encouraged (increasingly so these days) to put careful and
diligent effort into the conceptualization of new hypotheses based on
previous research, and to design experiments to minimize the impact of
extraneous variables. One hopes, too, although it is often not the
case, that scientists should always demand successful independent
replication by multiple researchers and laboratories before even
cautiously accepting a result as anything more than "encouraging".
Science is how consensus knowledge is built; anything else is just
personal opinions and interpretations.

I have some serious reservations with your explanation of this
project. For example:

"For example before the end of this winter, near a river, such first
contact will happen with two partners, married or living together;
they have been prepared by our Spirit team; they have Technology and
Quantum Physics skills. The lady is also quite psychic. We already
have their description and some details about them. They will help us
to put in theory our work."

What do you mean they have technology and quantum physics skills?
Please be specific by what you mean, and how this encouraged you to
consider this couple good subjects. How do you know "the lady is also
quite psychic?" Has she been tested using Zenar cards, RNGs, REGs,
Ganzfeld, direct physiological and cognitive and cognitive measures of
Psi? Or do you mean simply that you believe she is based on some
informal observations or reports that she is psychic?

Here is another portion:

"About us, the nonphysical scientists have noticed that our ITC spirit
images and the electromagnetic clouds on our screen were discolored
when our health was not so good. The electronic conditions created in
between our equipment in our basement enable apparently the spirits to
bring the healing and to take away what is not desirable on the
physical body."

Who are these nonphysical scientists? Can we have names, and proof of
credentials? Would they submit to a polygraph, or similar "lie
detecting" system, to verify their honest intentions? You mention
Instrumental Transcommunication images; I am aware of the hypothesis
behind them, but I have not yet seen any convincing evidence to show
that such images are anything but products of the imagination.
Personally, this idea of reversing an image to find another image
reminds me all too much of the "backwards messages" people have
claimed to hear on song albums, and Paul was NOT dead. Given how much
garbled incoherent nonsense appears when the music is played
backwards, or when video images are reversed, it is all too easy to
find a few instances that coincidentally resemble words, phrases, or
faces. Anyways, the case for ITC is not yet established, and even if
we take spontaneous cases as establishing convincing evidence, we
still have no scientific idea when, where, why, or how such things
might happen, or how to distinguish the genuine article from wishful
projections. Based on what hard scientific research has so far been
done on EVP, the case for ITC is not strong; and again, even if we
accepted that it sometimes could occur, we do not understand it well
enough to provide convincing evidence yet. As to your equipment
setup, you say it allows the spirits to directly bring healing and
remove what is not desirable. If true, this would be an amazing
breakthrough, and could without doubt be verified independently by
other researchers, if you would but publish the exact technical
specifications of your equipment.

And again:

"The knowledge of the diversity of the dimensions , the
wonderment of « the Great Spirit » that is within the manifestations
of the universe, is what we are being asked to capture, document, and
share."

Okay, #1) So you have already decided what the answer is, before even
starting your investigation? If so, beware the folly of using a
confirmatory trajectory in your research. #2) Are the rest of us
mortals going to be invited to capture and document these things, or
do you feel you have been chosen as "prophets" who need no one else to
do this except for people who already agree with you? I certainly
hope that you are not suggesting that people should accept your
findings without independent replication.

And here:

"They are sensible to the fact that the Researchers into the
paranormal domains are working hard to give to their research more
credibility. So, for example TO ADD CREDENCE to our research in
Transcommunication with the other dimensions, there is a plan (made by
them) of medecine research development in our basement which is at 46
kms South of Paris, with the help of many Spirit scientists (Spirit
Henry Franck, etc...). Spirit Marie Curie, specialized in X ray work,
is interrested by the potential of healing because of the electronic
conditions in our house, especially for the cancer treatment ; she
will come to help too."

This medicine research you intend to undertake, do you have approval
by the proper authorities in your nation to undertake such research?
I do not know how it works in France, but in the United States we jail
people for practicing medicine without a license, or for prescribing
unapproved forms of treatment, even for experimental purposes, and
even with willing volunteers. If you DO have approval, might I ask
how you managed to get the French medical authorities to approve such
extremely unusual and questionable forms of medical research? By the
way, it is good to see that you managed to obtain an All Star
celebrity cast of spirit researchers who, fortunately, had nothing
better to do with their afterlives than help mortals conduct
scientific research. Not to mention their graciousness in not
demanding that they work only with the most qualified mortal
scientists in their fields, and their compliance with your intention
not to accept outside scientific or technical assistance.

I simply cannot continue to respond to this message point by point, it
is too long, but I will summarize and say that you did not explain
your methods very clearly, you made a lot of unsubstantiated claims
and tried to use these to substantiate other unsubstantiated claims,
and what potentially testable claims that you did make are claims
which, if true, you should certainly be collecting your Nobel Prizes
by now for, so please publish them, else I think no one need believe
you. If no serious scientists will test your claims, then I can bet
the American TV show Mythbusters would be more than glad to, they test
a lot of "scientific" claims based on ETs, spirits, etc...

You were right that researchers into the paranormal are attempting to
achieve credibility for their research, yet I think that this type of
quasi-religious, poorly conceptualized, and poorly executed
pseudo-research is precisely what we are struggling against.
Researchers in all 'paranormal' related fields could take a definite
lesson from Parapsychology and adopt the methods of hard science.
Parapsychology not only has done this, but in fact in my experience
real professional Parapsychologists are far more meticulous and
cautious in their research and in their conclusions than in any other
of the established fields of sciences. Parapsychologists utilize
blind and double blind methodologies more frequently by far (based on
a university survey by Sheldrake, and one can easily see this by
comparing journals in different fields), put far more consideration
into experimenter effects and other artifacts, shield their
experiments far more meticulously from extraneous variables, are less
likely to selectively publish positive results, and are generally less
likely to quote results from a single study or studies by a single
researcher as "strongly established" (though we have been guilty of
this, too).

The human sciences ARE a good thing, not to be rejected wholesale for
pie-in-the-sky hopes that nonphysical "scientists" will tell us the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Please consider
taking a more scientific approach to this 'research', or else it would
probably (in my opinion) be fairer to call them 'spiritual practices'.
We are, after all, trying to maintain a separation between science
and faith; even mere assumptions, when made in the sciences, must at
least eventually be justified, and unverifiable ideas based on 'faith'
are simply not allowable in the physical sciences.