Olavi Kiviniemi wrote:


> "Main-stream" parapsychology failed to handle properly Uri Geller and
> "mini-Gellers". That was a major drawback to parapsychology, when
> first-class and compelling evidence was ignored and even blankly denied,
> because it was not "plausible".
>





I could not agree more!


> The loss could perhaps be partly repaired by building a network of best
> possible experts and looking what there is left of the evidence.
>



A very good suggestion indeed.


> Something
> has already been done - there is a vast bibliography concerning Geller
> information:
> http://www.zem.demon.co.uk/uribib.htm
> <http://www.zem.demon.co.uk/uribib.htm> .
>





A very interesting and highly recommendable website!


> The international metal-bending network would have at least following
> tasks: ...
>





All these suggestions -- the goals and the tasks -- sound very reasonable.
Remains the question: who will do it? Who will at least start it? (If
somebody starts such enterprise others may contribute).
Is there any funding for it or does it need to be done in one's spare time?

Anyway, Olavi, as you in a first step proposed such international
network, perhaps you might do the next step, too, and set up a website
for this purpose?


All best,
Peter_

--
================================================================
Prof. Peter MULACZ
>> PSI WIEN <<
================================================================
WWW: http://parapsychologie.info/
http://parapsychologie.ac.at/
http://zugun.parapsychologie.info
http://stigmatisation.parapsychologie.info
http://franz-anton-mesmer.parapsychologie.info
http://lambert-binder.parapsychologie.info
E-mail: peter.mulacz@...
peter.mulacz@...
Phone: +43 1 4058335
SnailMail: Hernalser Hauptstrasse 38 / 13
A-1170 WIEN/VIENNA
AUSTRIA
================================================================