PanoToolsNG : Messages : 54102-54131 of 56632

Is this an idea ? very sturdy and easy to handle.
(Feisol tripod + Fanotec pole + pole rotator + tripod adapter)

http://tinyurl.com/7n3qddl
(3 images)

Wim

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, luca vascon <luca.vascon@...> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, my own concern was about wobbling, for the small legs, and long
> monopod.
> @Jurgen,
> keep in mind that is a long, sturdy monopod, and that it can be paired with
> a 2nd monopod reversed on it (the way I did a lot of 3m high shots)
> @Hans,
> I also used a small, welldone chinese tripod with a long monopod inserted
> as central column (it was the right diameter), just before we made the
> Venice meeting. But I never mounted  it with the original column and the
> rotator between the 2, coz it was decreasing stability.
> Later I also completely reversed the scheme, using larger tripods, and
> attatching the camera to the small edge of the monopod..
> This increases stability and highness reachable. Though Agnos rotators and
> Manfrotto 300n are sturdy enough, I always prefer to rotate the tripod
> column and to have a straight connection between the tripod column and the
> monopod. I think my way  is less confortable, but more simple and secure.
> Did you upgraded that setup after the gondola shot? what directions took?
> @all,
> I used Feisol once. My impression was very good. I have many Manfrottos,
> one Gitzo, a Giottos, and 2 Berlebach, that are the ones that I'm mostly
> attatched to.
>
> --
> Luca Vascon.
>
> www.nuovostudio.it
> www.officinepanottiche.com
>

Reply | Messages in this Topic (17)

#54104

From: "panovrx" <panovrx@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 7:37 am
Subject: Istar pano camera array

panovrx

http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills


PeterM

#54105

From: AYRTON <avi@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 8:46 am
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

vrimages

Hello Peter

the iStar is not only to stills

It can be used to Video too !!!

That's the info that : Andrew Baddeley

Published on the super active Facebook Panoramic Photographers Group even before the launch of this camera in England last month.

"It's capable of outputting to touch tablet a live 360 degree stream as either navigable Pano or equirectangular projection at up to 25fps.

You can also record the source images to HD and post process to create a set of panos 10,000x5,000 px at a rate of 3 per second.

You can then merge to a 360 video via KRPano etc.

Of course if you drop the res then you can increase the framerate."

The Facebook Group it is an amazing space for up to date information as well.

best

AYRTON

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:37 AM, panovrx <panovrx@...> wrote:

http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills

PeterM

------------------------------------

--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: PanoToolsNG-owner@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
PanoToolsNG-digest@yahoogroups.com
PanoToolsNG-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
PanoToolsNG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

#54106

From: "Wim" <wim.koornneef@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 10:06 am
Subject: Registration for PanoTools Meeting 2012 is now open !

wim.koornneef

Just a short message to inform you that all relevant information is present on
the PTM website, you can register as attendee, propose a session, read how to
make a reservation for the group hotel and much more.

http://www.panotools-meeting.com/meetings/2012-hague-netherlands

See you in Den Haag.

--
The PTM2012 team

Reply | Messages in this Topic (1)

#54107

From: "enridp" <enridp@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 11:23 am
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

enridp

Big nadir, but it looks nice, now the question... How much? ^_^

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "panovrx" <panovrx@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
> high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills
>
>
> PeterM
>

#54108

From: luca vascon <luca.vascon@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 1:21 pm
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

officine_pan...

My dear Ayrton.. everything wiill move to facebook. But me.�

:-)

2012/5/3 AYRTON <avi@...>

Hello Peter
the iStar is not only to stills

It can be used to Video too !!!

That's the info that :�Andrew Baddeley�

Published on the super active Facebook Panoramic Photographers Group�even before the launch of this camera in England last month.

"It's capable of outputting to touch tablet a live 360 degree stream as either navigable Pano or equirectangular projection at up to 25fps.�

You can also record the source images to HD and post process to create a set of panos 10,000x5,000 px at a rate of 3 per second.�

You can then merge to a 360 video via KRPano etc.�
Of course if you drop the res then you can increase the framerate."

The Facebook Group it is an amazing space for up to date information as well.

best

AYRTON

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:37 AM, panovrx <panovrx@...> wrote:
http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills

PeterM

------------------------------------

--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: PanoToolsNG-owner@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
� �http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
� �Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
� �http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
� �(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
� �PanoToolsNG-digest@yahoogroups.com
� �PanoToolsNG-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
� �PanoToolsNG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
� �http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--
Luca Vascon.

www.nuovostudio.it
www.officinepanottiche.com

#54109

From: Erik Krause <erik.krause@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 4:58 pm
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

ekrause2003

Am 03.05.2012 09:37, schrieb panovrx:
> http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
> high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills

I wonder whether they know that Istar is the Assyrian and Babylonian
goddess of fertility, war, love and sex...

[SCNR]
--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de

#54110

From: Ken Warner <kwarner000@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 5:09 pm
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

kwarner000@...

Nadir problems?

panovrx wrote:
> http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
> high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills
>
>
> PeterM
>
>

#54111

From: Ken Warner <kwarner000@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 5:17 pm
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

kwarner000@...

...and me.  Facebook is just a place where you will be used for targeted
advertising.

luca vascon wrote:
> My dear Ayrton.. everything wiill move to facebook. But me.
> :-)
>
>
> 2012/5/3 AYRTON <avi@...>
>
>>
>> Hello Peter
>> the iStar is not only to stills
>>
>> It can be used to Video too !!!
>>
>> That's the info that : Andrew Baddeley<https://www.facebook.com/andybadders>
>>
>> Published on the super active Facebook Panoramic Photographers Group even
>> before the launch of this camera in England last month.
>>
>> "It's capable of outputting to touch tablet a live 360 degree stream as
>> either navigable Pano or equirectangular projection at up to 25fps.
>> You can also record the source images to HD and post process to create a
>> set of panos 10,000x5,000 px at a rate of 3 per second.
>> You can then merge to a 360 video via KRPano etc.
>> Of course if you drop the res then you can increase the framerate."
>>
>>
>> The Facebook Group it is an amazing space for up to date information as
>> well.
>>
>> best
>> AYRTON
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:37 AM, panovrx <panovrx@...> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
>>> high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills
>>>
>>>
>>> PeterM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

#54112

From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 8:29 pm
Subject: RE: Istar pano camera array

pderocco0

> From: panovrx
>
> http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
> high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills

They should sell them to Google. Then maybe their Street View imagery would
stitch properly for a change.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@...

#54113

From: "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 11:07 pm
Subject: aberration correction in acr 6.7

sachagriffin

There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.

It’s fully automatic.

Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections with 6.6?

It appears to work, but I’m a little concerned about how well it works without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).

Best Regards,

Sacha Griffin

Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia

Office: 404-551-4275

#54114

From: "Hans" <hans@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 11:20 pm
Subject: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

panoramicsdk

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
>
> It's fully automatic.
>
> Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections with
> 6.6?
>
> It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
>

Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
Read my post  from april 4.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755

Hans

#54115

From: AYRTON <avi@...>
Date: Thu May 3, 2012 11:35 pm
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

vrimages

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:21 AM, luca vascon <luca.vascon@...> wrote:

My dear Ayrton.. everything wiill move to facebook. But me.
:-)

Yes I know :-)

but your partner was there in another group for VIDEOs 360

showing the Venice 360 video

:-)

Cheers from RIO

2012/5/3 AYRTON <avi@...>

Hello Peter
the iStar is not only to stills

It can be used to Video too !!!

That's the info that : Andrew Baddeley

Published on the super active Facebook Panoramic Photographers Group even before the launch of this camera in England last month.

"It's capable of outputting to touch tablet a live 360 degree stream as either navigable Pano or equirectangular projection at up to 25fps.

You can also record the source images to HD and post process to create a set of panos 10,000x5,000 px at a rate of 3 per second.

You can then merge to a 360 video via KRPano etc.
Of course if you drop the res then you can increase the framerate."

The Facebook Group it is an amazing space for up to date information as well.

best

AYRTON

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:37 AM, panovrx <panovrx@...> wrote:
http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills

PeterM

------------------------------------

--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: PanoToolsNG-owner@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
PanoToolsNG-digest@yahoogroups.com
PanoToolsNG-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
PanoToolsNG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--
Luca Vascon.

www.nuovostudio.it
www.officinepanottiche.com

#54116

From: luca vascon <luca.vascon@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 6:46 am
Subject: Re: Istar pano camera array

officine_pan...

yes, someone in the company has to do it...

:-D

;-)

welll... temptation is to come to meet you in Rio, with a one-way ticket.

:-D then I'll find a remote place in your country place to stay all the day eating seafood and fruit, with no electricity or phones... (wander if still exists)

2012/5/4 AYRTON <avi@...>

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:21 AM, luca vascon <luca.vascon@...> wrote:

My dear Ayrton.. everything wiill move to facebook. But me.�
:-)

Yes I know :-)
but your partner was there in another group for VIDEOs 360

showing the Venice 360 video
:-)

Cheers from RIO

A

�

2012/5/3 AYRTON <avi@...>

Hello Peter
the iStar is not only to stills

It can be used to Video too !!!

That's the info that :�Andrew Baddeley�

Published on the super active Facebook Panoramic Photographers Group�even before the launch of this camera in England last month.

"It's capable of outputting to touch tablet a live 360 degree stream as either navigable Pano or equirectangular projection at up to 25fps.�

You can also record the source images to HD and post process to create a set of panos 10,000x5,000 px at a rate of 3 per second.�

You can then merge to a 360 video via KRPano etc.�
Of course if you drop the res then you can increase the framerate."

The Facebook Group it is an amazing space for up to date information as well.

best

AYRTON

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:37 AM, panovrx <panovrx@...> wrote:
http://www.nctech.co.uk/index.php
high tech looking system -- 4 cameras -- for 360 stills

PeterM

------------------------------------

--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: PanoToolsNG-owner@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
� �http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
� �Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
� �http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
� �(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
� �PanoToolsNG-digest@yahoogroups.com
� �PanoToolsNG-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
� �PanoToolsNG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
� �http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--
Luca Vascon.

www.nuovostudio.it
www.officinepanottiche.com

--
Luca Vascon.

www.nuovostudio.it
www.officinepanottiche.com

#54117

From: Jeffrey Martin <panoramas@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 7:26 am
Subject: Fwd: panoviewer on WP7 ?

jefffreymartin

does anyone know about any way to view panos on windows phone 7?

Jeffrey

Reply | Messages in this Topic (3)

#54118

From: Roger D Williams <roger@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 10:47 am
Subject: Re: Fwd: panoviewer on WP7 ?

roger_d_will...

Yes, you can use photosynth. I haven't actually confirmed this myself, but photosynth displays panoramas beautifully on iPhones and iPads, so it seems certain that it will do so on Microsoft's own phones.

Roger W.

Sent from my iPad

On May 4, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Jeffrey Martin <panoramas@...> wrote:

does anyone know about any way to view panos on windows phone 7?

Jeffrey

Reply | Messages in this Topic (3)

#54119

From: "panovrx" <panovrx@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 12:33 pm
Subject: Panoramic timelapse movies

panovrx

http://www.murphlab.com/2011/03/21/new-website-and-blog-hizzah-2/
these are interesting I think. He is an artist who uses CHDK and a Canon compact
and a telescope rotator to shoot rotating time lapse movies -- but then he
arranges the footage in 10 degree slices each offset in time from its neighbours
-- to compose a complete 360 view on the screen in 36 slices. So potentially you
get the high resolution of a single view across a very wide format. Surprisingly
the motion still looks natural split up like that.

PeterM

Reply | Messages in this Topic (2)

#54120

From: "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 1:53 pm
Subject: RE: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

sachagriffin

I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the previous version for a comparison on the correction.

sacha

From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
>
> It's fully automatic.
>
> Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections with
> 6.6?
>
> It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
>

Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
Read my post from april 4.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755

Hans

#54121

From: Willy Kaemena <panokaemena@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 3:56 pm
Subject: Re: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

panokaemena

That would be interesting... I will do that later today, I still have one Mac without the beta Raw converter.

Willy

On May 4, 2012, at 15:53, Sacha Griffin wrote:

I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the previous version for a comparison on the correction.

sacha

From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
>
> It's fully automatic.
>
> Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections with
> 6.6?
>
> It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
>

Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
Read my post from april 4.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755

Hans
.

#54122

From: "Hans" <hans@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 4:08 pm
Subject: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

panoramicsdk

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> previous version for a comparison on the correction.

Thats what I did.

Hans


>
>
>
> sacha
>
>
>
>
>
> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>
>
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> >
> > It's fully automatic.
> >
> > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> with
> > 6.6?
> >
> > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> >
>
> Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> Read my post from april 4.
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
>
> Hans
>
> .
>
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
>

#54123

From: "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 4:13 pm
Subject: RE: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

sachagriffin

We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.

I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I’m wondering if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess with consistency, for fisheyes.

Best Regards,

Sacha Griffin

Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia

Office: 404-551-4275

From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> previous version for a comparison on the correction.

Thats what I did.

Hans

>
>
>
> sacha
>
>
>
>
>
> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>
>
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> >
> > It's fully automatic.
> >
> > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> with
> > 6.6?
> >
> > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> >
>
> Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> Read my post from april 4.
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
>
> Hans
>
> .
>
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
>

#54124

From: luca vascon <luca.vascon@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: Panoramic timelapse movies

officine_pan...

http://www.officinepanottiche.com/test/343/panolapse.html

:-P

Use the bleach or recycle....

2012/5/4 panovrx <panovrx@...>

http://www.murphlab.com/2011/03/21/new-website-and-blog-hizzah-2/
these are interesting I think. He is an artist who uses CHDK and a Canon compact and a telescope rotator to shoot rotating time lapse movies -- but then he arranges the footage in 10 degree slices each offset in time from its neighbours -- to compose a complete 360 view on the screen in 36 slices. So potentially you get the high resolution of a single view across a very wide format. Surprisingly the motion still looks natural split up like that.

PeterM

------------------------------------

--
<*> Wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org
<*> User Guidelines: http://wiki.panotools.org/User_Guidelines
<*> Nabble (Web) http://panotoolsng.586017.n4.nabble.com/
<*> NG Member Map http://www.panomaps.com/ng
<*> Moderators/List Admins: PanoToolsNG-owner@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
� �http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/

<*> Your email settings:
� �Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
� �http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/join
� �(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
� �PanoToolsNG-digest@yahoogroups.com
� �PanoToolsNG-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
� �PanoToolsNG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
� �http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

--
Luca Vascon.

www.nuovostudio.it
www.officinepanottiche.com

Reply | Messages in this Topic (2)

#54125

From: "Hans" <hans@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 4:56 pm
Subject: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

panoramicsdk

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.

Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5

http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif

One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.

I am not going to tell you which is what.

Hans

>
> J
>
> I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
> if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
> with consistency, for fisheyes.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Sacha Griffin
>
> Southern Digital Solutions LLC  - Atlanta, Georgia
>
>  <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
>
>  <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
>
>  <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
>
> IM:  <mailto:sachagriffin007@...> sachagriffin007@...
>
> Office: 404-551-4275
>
>
>
>
>
> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
>
> Thats what I did.
>
> Hans
>
> >
> >
> >
> > sacha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > >
> > > It's fully automatic.
> > >
> > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> > with
> > > 6.6?
> > >
> > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > >
> >
> > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > Read my post from april 4.
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> >
>

#54126

From: "Mark D. Fink" <markdfink@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 5:03 pm
Subject: RE: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

markdfink

I'm not seeing huge differences between the two, but the background layer
seems to have slightly less purple fringing. Also, less falloff at the
edges. And the winner is...?

Thanks for posting the image!

Mark

www.northernlight.net
www.virtual-travels.com
www.pinnacle-vr.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Hans
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:57 PM
> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>
>
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>
> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>
> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>
> I am not going to tell you which is what.
>
> Hans
>
> >
> > J
> >
> > I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> > bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm
> wondering
> > if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even
> mess
> > with consistency, for fisheyes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sacha Griffin
> >
> > Southern Digital Solutions LLC  - Atlanta, Georgia
> >
> >  <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
> >
> >  <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
> >
> >  <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > IM:  <mailto:sachagriffin007@...> sachagriffin007@...
> >
> > Office: 404-551-4275
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
> >
> > Thats what I did.
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > sacha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Hans
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > > >
> > > > It's fully automatic.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual
> corrections
> > > with
> > > > 6.6?
> > > >
> > > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it
> works
> > > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > > Read my post from april 4.
> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/ms
> gI
> > > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> --
>
>
>

#54127

From: "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 5:13 pm
Subject: RE: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

sachagriffin

Layer 1 is superior in aberration correction, with a trade-off of being slightly blurrier.

Best Regards,

Sacha Griffin

Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia

Office: 404-551-4275

From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:57 PM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...> wrote:
>
> We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.

Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5

http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif

One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.

I am not going to tell you which is what.

Hans

#54128

From: "Hans" <hans@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 5:42 pm
Subject: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

panoramicsdk

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>
> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>
> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>
> I am not going to tell you which is what.


Here is another one which has a nasty bluefringe which is almost impossible to
remove completely without extra desatuarion

It's Tokina 10-17 at 10mm.
http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA-tokina.tif

Hans

>
> Hans
>
> >
> > J
> >
> > I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> > bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
> > if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
> > with consistency, for fisheyes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sacha Griffin
> >
> > Southern Digital Solutions LLC  - Atlanta, Georgia
> >
> >  <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
> >
> >  <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
> >
> >  <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > IM:  <mailto:sachagriffin007@> sachagriffin007@
> >
> > Office: 404-551-4275
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
> >
> > Thats what I did.
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > sacha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Hans
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > > >
> > > > It's fully automatic.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> > > with
> > > > 6.6?
> > > >
> > > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > > Read my post from april 4.
> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> > > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> > >
> >
>

#54129

From: Ken Warner <kwarner000@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 5:48 pm
Subject: Re: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

kwarner000@...

Hans, how about posting 100% crops of a corner or something?
Your samples are huge and take a long time to download.

Hans wrote:
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
>>> We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>>
>> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>>
>> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>>
>> I am not going to tell you which is what.
>
>
> Here is another one which has a nasty bluefringe which is almost impossible to
remove completely without extra desatuarion
>
> It's Tokina 10-17 at 10mm.
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA-tokina.tif
>
> Hans
>
>> Hans
>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
>>> bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
>>> if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
>>> with consistency, for fisheyes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sacha Griffin
>>>
>>> Southern Digital Solutions LLC  - Atlanta, Georgia
>>>
>>>  <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
>>>
>>>  <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
>>>
>>>  <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
>>>
>>> IM:  <mailto:sachagriffin007@> sachagriffin007@
>>>
>>> Office: 404-551-4275
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
>>> Behalf Of Hans
>>> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
>>> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
>>>> I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
>>>> previous version for a comparison on the correction.
>>> Thats what I did.
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> sacha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of Hans
>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
>>>> To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
>>>> Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>>>> "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
>>>>> There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's fully automatic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
>>>> with
>>>>> 6.6?
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
>>>>> without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
>>>>>
>>>> Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
>>>> Read my post from april 4.
>>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
>>>> d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
>>>>
>
>
>

#54130

From: "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 6:18 pm
Subject: RE: Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

sachagriffin

Pretty crappy image Hans for a comparison, little good subject matter to see aberration and the background layer one is over sharpened and has sharpening halos comparatively.

I still think Layer 1 is better in aberration.. but its close enough not to care about any more.

Thanks for the examples.

Best Regards,

Sacha Griffin

Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia

Office: 404-551-4275

From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hans
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 1:42 PM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans" <hans@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> >
> > We need center, and corner 100% crop comparisons.
>
> Here is a layered tif. 5d with 10.5
>
> http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA.tif
>
> One is manual and one is the new version 6.7 auto.
>
> I am not going to tell you which is what.

Here is another one which has a nasty bluefringe which is almost impossible to remove completely without extra desatuarion

It's Tokina 10-17 at 10mm.
http://www.panoramas.dk/panorama/CameraRaw/ACR_autoCA-tokina.tif

Hans

>
> Hans
>
> >
> > J
> >
> > I still see a bit of CA on the edges in the new version, which is why I
> > bring this up also since it appears to be content dependent.. I'm wondering
> > if the large amount of un-unused sensor area might affect it, or even mess
> > with consistency, for fisheyes.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Sacha Griffin
> >
> > Southern Digital Solutions LLC - Atlanta, Georgia
> >
> > <http://www.seeit360.com/> http://www.seeit360.com
> >
> > <http://twitter.com/SeeIt360> http://twitter.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > <http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360> http://www.facebook.com/SeeIt360
> >
> > IM: <mailto:sachagriffin007@> sachagriffin007@
> >
> > Office: 404-551-4275
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf Of Hans
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 12:08 PM
> > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping someone has gone through the effort of re-installing the
> > > previous version for a comparison on the correction.
> >
> > Thats what I did.
> >
> > Hans
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > sacha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Hans
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:20 PM
> > > To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: aberration correction in acr 6.7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > "Sacha Griffin" <sachagriffin@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are no more correction sliders in acr 6.7.
> > > >
> > > > It's fully automatic.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone done some comparisons between acr 6.7 and manual corrections
> > > with
> > > > 6.6?
> > > >
> > > > It appears to work, but I'm a little concerned about how well it works
> > > > without any accurate exif data (Nikon lens on canon).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Already tested this in the Beta a month ago.
> > > Read my post from april 4.
> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/53755
> > >
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18227848/grpspId=1705006496/msgI
> > > d=54114/stime=1336087215/nc1=5522123/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848642>
> > >
> >
>

#54131

From: "blueslander" <trausti.hraunfjord@...>
Date: Fri May 4, 2012 6:38 pm
Subject: Flashificator-new website

blueslander