Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
R1b1c_U106-S21 · R1b1c_U106-S21_Haplogroup
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2318 - 2347 of 2347   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#2347 From: "mfousse" <mfousse@...>
Date: Sat Dec 5, 2009 8:31 pm
Subject: Re: A new SNP L237
mfousse
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Good luck :-)

I hope to get my WTY results back sometime in the next 2 months.

Michael Fousse

--- In R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com, "Susan Mertz" <dolls@...> wrote:
>
> I just joined the L48+ WTY so maybe there will be a new SNP discovered in
another 6-9 months.  I'm in the Frisian cluster, Ysearch ZXSTZ.
>

#2346 From: Raymond Wing <wing_genealogist@...>
Date: Sat Dec 5, 2009 7:40 am
Subject: RE: M157.2 (private SNP below L48)
wing_genealo...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
Brian,

I am L47-, and others who are L47+ do not have this SNP (per Adrian Squecco's 23andMe file). Therefor, M157.2 is a brother clade to L47 (as well as L148, L188 and others).  Thomas Krahn has placed M157.2 on his ytree.ftdna.com site.

Ray

--- On Sat, 12/5/09, brian swann <bps@...> wrote:

From: brian swann <bps@...>
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106-S21] M157.2 (private SNP below L48)
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, December 5, 2009, 2:35 AM

 

Dear Raymond
 
I presume Craig Venter's published genome sequence does not have this new SNP - is that correct?  He is R1b-L48, of course.
 
Brian
 
Brian P. Swann
ISOGG Regional Co-ordinator, England and & Wales
 
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:R1b1c_ U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Raymond Wing
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 7:12 AM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106- S21] M157.2 (private SNP below L48)

 

I believe I have posted to this site about a new SNP being found by 23andMe in my DNA. This SNP (M157) has been verified by FT DNA and has been given the designation of M157.2 (as it was previously found in R1a).

I have had another family member test for this SNP at FT DNA (which now offers this test in its Advanced Orders). Our most recent common ancestor was born in 1584. He also tested positive for this SNP.

The next step is to find other surnames who have this SNP. My family share a couple of rare DYS values including DYS 439=13, DYS 458=19 and (see ySearch 3QBMB for full details)

Raymond T. Wing
Genealogist, Wing Family of America, Inc. [WFA]
www.wingfamily. org



#2345 From: "brian swann" <bps@...>
Date: Sat Dec 5, 2009 7:35 am
Subject: RE: M157.2 (private SNP below L48)
swann46
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Raymond
 
I presume Craig Venter's published genome sequence does not have this new SNP - is that correct?  He is R1b-L48, of course.
 
Brian
 
Brian P. Swann
ISOGG Regional Co-ordinator, England and & Wales
 
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Raymond Wing
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 7:12 AM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] M157.2 (private SNP below L48)

 

I believe I have posted to this site about a new SNP being found by 23andMe in my DNA. This SNP (M157) has been verified by FT DNA and has been given the designation of M157.2 (as it was previously found in R1a).

I have had another family member test for this SNP at FT DNA (which now offers this test in its Advanced Orders). Our most recent common ancestor was born in 1584. He also tested positive for this SNP.

The next step is to find other surnames who have this SNP. My family share a couple of rare DYS values including DYS 439=13, DYS 458=19 and (see ySearch 3QBMB for full details)

Raymond T. Wing
Genealogist, Wing Family of America, Inc. [WFA]
www.wingfamily.org


#2344 From: Raymond Wing <wing_genealogist@...>
Date: Sat Dec 5, 2009 7:12 am
Subject: M157.2 (private SNP below L48)
wing_genealo...
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 
I believe I have posted to this site about a new SNP being found by 23andMe in my DNA. This SNP (M157) has been verified by FT DNA and has been given the designation of M157.2 (as it was previously found in R1a).

I have had another family member test for this SNP at FT DNA (which now offers this test in its Advanced Orders). Our most recent common ancestor was born in 1584. He also tested positive for this SNP.

The next step is to find other surnames who have this SNP. My family share a couple of rare DYS values including DYS 439=13, DYS 458=19 and (see ySearch 3QBMB for full details)

Raymond T. Wing
Genealogist, Wing Family of America, Inc. [WFA]
www.wingfamily.org


#2343 From: "Susan Mertz" <dolls@...>
Date: Thu Dec 3, 2009 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: A new SNP L237
connofthe100...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I just joined the L48+ WTY so maybe there will be a new SNP discovered in another 6-9 months.  I'm in the Frisian cluster, Ysearch ZXSTZ.

#2342 From: "Graeme" <gtc131@...>
Date: Wed Dec 2, 2009 4:21 pm
Subject: Re: A new SNP L237
gtc131
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com, "ospicton" <ospicton@...> wrote:

>  I just looked on Ysearch and the list for those who test positive for L48+
has grown from 0 to 210 names this year.

And most if us seem to be stuck there, too. :-(

> This year, new SNPs continue to be found for in my Y-DNA.  I tested  positive
at FTDNA for L44+,  L46+,  L47+ and L48+.
>
> Then 23and Me  SNP results showed that I additionally test positive for L45+,
L163+,  L164+ and a new SNP rs13305070.

You are truly remarkable in that regard. At this rate you'll have your own
grouping in Adrian's sheet.

#2341 From: Brent Richards <brent.richards77@...>
Date: Wed Dec 2, 2009 9:54 am
Subject: Re: A new SNP L237
brent_troy_r...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
L237 is also definitely below L163.  

cheers


On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:37 PM, brian swann <bps@...> wrote:


Downstream from L48 and L47.
 
Thomas Krahn has them on his Y-DNA browser at FTDNA.
 
The sequence goes L48, L47, L44 and then at present it is a toss-up how L46, L45, L163, L164 and L237 fit together - not enough folk tested to say anything much useful - unless Thomas Krahn knows different.
 
Brian
 
Brian Picton Swann
ISOGG Regional Co-ordinator, England & Wales
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John German
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:50 AM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [R1b1c_U106-S21] A new SNP L237

 

Are the new SNPs upstream or downstream from L48?

ospicton wrote:

>Hi
>I think a lot continues to happen in this U106 group. We are on the cutting edge. Nothing remains static. A year ago we just started talking about L44, L45, L46, L47 and L48. Tests were not available from FTDNA until January or February for these SNPs. I just looked on Ysearch and the list for those who test positive for L48+ has grown from 0 to 210 names this year.
>
>This year, new SNPs continue to be found for in my Y-DNA. I tested positive at FTDNA for L44+, L46+, L47+ and L48+.
>
>Then 23and Me SNP results showed that I additionally test positive for L45+, L163+, L164+ and a new SNP rs13305070.
>
>Adriano Squecco just sent me an Email message that the new SNP rs13305070 has been named L237. I was the first found with this SNP.
>
>AS I understand it, FTDNA did not find L237 in my WTY test results because they do not yet test for it. Brian Swann asked Thomas Krahn of FTDNA if he could check and see if Criag Venter has L163, L164 and L237. Thomas Krahn was kind enough to check and reported that Craig Venter also is positive for L163, L164,and L237.
>
>My WTY results came today. What new discovery will I find. I am blessed with all the results.
>
>Blessings,
>Owen
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>





#2340 From: "brian swann" <bps@...>
Date: Wed Dec 2, 2009 9:37 am
Subject: RE: A new SNP L237
swann46
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Downstream from L48 and L47.
 
Thomas Krahn has them on his Y-DNA browser at FTDNA.
 
The sequence goes L48, L47, L44 and then at present it is a toss-up how L46, L45, L163, L164 and L237 fit together - not enough folk tested to say anything much useful - unless Thomas Krahn knows different.
 
Brian
 
Brian Picton Swann
ISOGG Regional Co-ordinator, England & Wales
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John German
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:50 AM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [R1b1c_U106-S21] A new SNP L237

 

Are the new SNPs upstream or downstream from L48?

ospicton wrote:

>Hi
>I think a lot continues to happen in this U106 group. We are on the cutting edge. Nothing remains static. A year ago we just started talking about L44, L45, L46, L47 and L48. Tests were not available from FTDNA until January or February for these SNPs. I just looked on Ysearch and the list for those who test positive for L48+ has grown from 0 to 210 names this year.
>
>This year, new SNPs continue to be found for in my Y-DNA. I tested positive at FTDNA for L44+, L46+, L47+ and L48+.
>
>Then 23and Me SNP results showed that I additionally test positive for L45+, L163+, L164+ and a new SNP rs13305070.
>
>Adriano Squecco just sent me an Email message that the new SNP rs13305070 has been named L237. I was the first found with this SNP.
>
>AS I understand it, FTDNA did not find L237 in my WTY test results because they do not yet test for it. Brian Swann asked Thomas Krahn of FTDNA if he could check and see if Criag Venter has L163, L164 and L237. Thomas Krahn was kind enough to check and reported that Craig Venter also is positive for L163, L164,and L237.
>
>My WTY results came today. What new discovery will I find. I am blessed with all the results.
>
>Blessings,
>Owen
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>


#2339 From: "ospicton" <ospicton@...>
Date: Wed Dec 2, 2009 1:51 am
Subject: A new SNP L237
ospicton
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi
I think one must be L46+ then you would most likely be L237+
Blessings,
Owen

#2338 From: John German <german@...>
Date: Wed Dec 2, 2009 12:50 am
Subject: Re: A new SNP L237
germyn
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Are the new SNPs upstream or downstream from L48?

ospicton wrote:

>Hi
>I think a lot continues to happen in this U106 group.  We are on the cutting
edge.  Nothing remains static.  A year ago  we just started talking about L44,
L45, L46,  L47 and L48.  Tests were not available from FTDNA until January or
February for these SNPs.  I just looked on Ysearch and the list for those who
test positive for L48+ has grown from 0 to 210 names this year.
>
>This year, new SNPs continue to be found for in my Y-DNA.  I tested  positive
at FTDNA for L44+,  L46+,  L47+ and L48+.
>
>Then 23and Me  SNP results showed that I additionally test positive for L45+,
L163+,  L164+ and a new SNP rs13305070.
>
>Adriano Squecco just sent me an Email message that the new SNP rs13305070 has
been named L237.  I was the first found with this SNP.
>
>AS I understand it, FTDNA did not find L237  in my WTY test results because
they do not yet test for it.  Brian Swann asked Thomas Krahn of FTDNA if he
could check and see if Criag Venter has L163, L164 and L237.  Thomas Krahn was
kind enough to check and reported that Craig Venter also is positive for L163,
L164,and L237.
>
>My WTY results came today.   What new discovery  will I find.  I am blessed
with all the results.
>
>Blessings,
>Owen
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

#2337 From: "ospicton" <ospicton@...>
Date: Tue Dec 1, 2009 10:59 pm
Subject: A new SNP L237
ospicton
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi
I think a lot continues to happen in this U106 group.  We are on the cutting
edge.  Nothing remains static.  A year ago  we just started talking about L44,
L45, L46,  L47 and L48.  Tests were not available from FTDNA until January or
February for these SNPs.  I just looked on Ysearch and the list for those who
test positive for L48+ has grown from 0 to 210 names this year.

This year, new SNPs continue to be found for in my Y-DNA.  I tested  positive at
FTDNA for L44+,  L46+,  L47+ and L48+.

Then 23and Me  SNP results showed that I additionally test positive for L45+,
L163+,  L164+ and a new SNP rs13305070.

Adriano Squecco just sent me an Email message that the new SNP rs13305070 has
been named L237.  I was the first found with this SNP.

AS I understand it, FTDNA did not find L237  in my WTY test results because they
do not yet test for it.  Brian Swann asked Thomas Krahn of FTDNA if he could
check and see if Criag Venter has L163, L164 and L237.  Thomas Krahn was kind
enough to check and reported that Craig Venter also is positive for L163,
L164,and L237.

My WTY results came today.   What new discovery  will I find.  I am blessed with
all the results.

Blessings,
Owen

#2336 From: "lairdkinna" <lairdkinna@...>
Date: Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:13 pm
Subject: DUNN 28464 adv. SNP results
lairdkinna
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The latest adv. SNP results are in for DUNN Kit 28464 Ysearch M6V8M.  He is
negative on the additional SNPs that were ordered to confirm his placement on
the haplotree.

Connie

R1b1b2a1a4 at FTDNA

M269+ U106+ L48+

L1- L148- L179- L180- L188- L47- P107- P312- SRY2627- U198-

http://www.familytreedna.com/public/johnsoncountyillinoisDNAproject/default.aspx\
?section=yresults

#2335 From: "brian swann" <bps@...>
Date: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:09 am
Subject: RE: R1b-L148 now an official subclade
swann46
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks Mike
 
I appreciate your comments and analysis - plus all the hard work that you, David and the rest of the team here do.  We would not have made as much progress and depth of analysis without you.
 
Part of this question was a result that Owen Picton received from 23andMe - which seems to be a new SNP and possibly unique to him.  Is there any place this type of information should/could be captured?
 
It has a designation of rs13305070.  I guess it may eventually get an L designation number from FTDNA.  What detail of information do they need to do this?  I assume Thomas Krahn makes these assignments.
 
On a separate note, I have heard that Craig Venter has actually given us a DNA sample, so we now stand a good chance of getting his STR profile out to 67 markers in a reasonable time-scale.  I guess the next step after that - will be to find out what he knows about his family history beyond that published in his autobiography!
 
For those who do not appreciate it - he is the closest match we have on the Haplogroup Tree of this Group put together by Charles Moore and the other people I have already acknowledged here.  We are just trying to confirm our genetic differences out to the 67-marker level, as we already have a GD of 6 for the two Pictons we have already tested out this far, and whose lineages probably meet in the 1400s. 
 
Best regards
 
Brian
 
Brian Picton Swann
ISOGG Regional Co-ordinator, England & Wales
 
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Maddi
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 12:55 AM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade

 

Our project website follows whatever nomenclature that FTDNA uses. There's no easy way around this, as FTDNA hosts our website and it would be difficult to organize the website haplotype tables according to results that are not part of their official tree. In other words, although you can test L47, L44, L46 and L148 at FTDNA, that is only through the Advanced Orders menu, not through the deep clade test, so far. Only subclades and their SNPs included in the deep clade test are officially part of FTDNA's tree.

David Weston keeps external webpages which display the results of his analysis of the results of the project's members. This is where each member is compared to the other members in his particular subclade/group and can be accessed on the "Results" page on the FTDNA project website, at http://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106/default.aspx?section=results

David has indicated that he will begin to separate out those who are in the L44 and L46 and possibly L148 subclades soon, possibly with the next update of his analysis which may occur in the next week. He has been including L47 as a separate group for comparison, since it's not merely a few members,

So the short answer is that we don't go beyond ISOGG's official nomenclature, which is more up to date than that of FTDNA. Consequently, the answer to the rest of your question about the criteria for determining what is a private/family SNP and what is a phylogenetically significant SNP is found on the ISOGG page for their criteria on this question. We certainly would not venture beyond how ISOGG handles this question. That page is at http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_SNP_Requirements09.html

Mike Maddi

--- On Fri, 11/27/09, brian swann <bps@norvic8.force9.co.uk> wrote:

From: brian swann <bps@norvic8.force9.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 3:04 PM

 

Dear Mike
 
Is there any policy as to how you classify a SNP as a private or family SNP?  Presumably just one individual or family name has it.
 
The reason for the question is that it could seem to correlate with the standardisation of surnames in any given country.  As more people test - and more surnames have their deep ancestry explored ever deeper downwards - you must have a transition from SNPs which bridge hundreds or even thousands of surnames, down an ever tapering tree until you get to private or family surname SNPs at the bottom.  It is just when this standardisation of surnames occurs which can be quite variable.
 
So there must be a natural gradation in SNP frequency - and the hope must be that they will coalesce with the STR patterns going backwards.  So should ISOGG be recording these family SNPs on the ISOGG tree, as one day some might bridge more than the one surname, or will that all become too cumbersome - both in recording and nomenclature terms?
 
Brian
 
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:R1b1c_ U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of mtmaddi
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106- S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade
 

Eldon Wade just posted over at dna-forums.org about a change in ISOGG's Haplogroup R tree that affects R1b-U106. ISOGG has now added a new subclade of L48, defined by L148, with the name R1b1b2a1a1d2. You can see this at http://www.isogg. org/tree/ ISOGG_HapgrpR09. html

L148 was discovered in Eldon's WTY results. It's offered on the Advanced Orders menu and has been found positive in two other R1b-L48 men. Since the three R1b-L148 men all have different surnames, that was sufficient for ISOGG to regard this as a new subclade and not as a private or family SNP.

Congratulations, Eldon!

Mike Maddi



#2334 From: "Gary & Ann Blakely" <b424r560@...>
Date: Sat Nov 28, 2009 1:38 am
Subject: RE: R1b-L148 now an official subclade
garyrayblakely
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi Mike,

 

P89.2 & L159.2 both have 3 or more surnames so it has to be more that that to get listed. I have assumed that there is a GD range required to be listed. What is the GD for the L148 people?

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mtmaddi
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 10:11 AM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade

 

 

Eldon Wade just posted over at dna-forums.org about a change in ISOGG's Haplogroup R tree that affects R1b-U106. ISOGG has now added a new subclade of L48, defined by L148, with the name R1b1b2a1a1d2. You can see this at http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR09.html

L148 was discovered in Eldon's WTY results. It's offered on the Advanced Orders menu and has been found positive in two other R1b-L48 men. Since the three R1b-L148 men all have different surnames, that was sufficient for ISOGG to regard this as a new subclade and not as a private or family SNP.

Congratulations, Eldon!

Mike Maddi


#2333 From: Michael Maddi <mtmaddi@...>
Date: Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:54 am
Subject: RE: R1b-L148 now an official subclade
mtmaddi
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Our project website follows whatever nomenclature that FTDNA uses. There's no easy way around this, as FTDNA hosts our website and it would be difficult to organize the website haplotype tables according to results that are not part of their official tree. In other words, although you can test L47, L44, L46 and L148 at FTDNA, that is only through the Advanced Orders menu, not through the deep clade test, so far. Only subclades and their SNPs included in the deep clade test are officially part of FTDNA's tree.

David Weston keeps external webpages which display the results of his analysis of the results of the project's members. This is where each member is compared to the other members in his particular subclade/group and can be accessed on the "Results" page on the FTDNA project website, at http://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106/default.aspx?section=results

David has indicated that he will begin to separate out those who are in the L44 and L46 and possibly L148 subclades soon, possibly with the next update of his analysis which may occur in the next week. He has been including L47 as a separate group for comparison, since it's not merely a few members,

So the short answer is that we don't go beyond ISOGG's official nomenclature, which is more up to date than that of FTDNA. Consequently, the answer to the rest of your question about the criteria for determining what is a private/family SNP and what is a phylogenetically significant SNP is found on the ISOGG page for their criteria on this question. We certainly would not venture beyond how ISOGG handles this question. That page is at http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_SNP_Requirements09.html

Mike Maddi

--- On Fri, 11/27/09, brian swann <bps@...> wrote:

From: brian swann <bps@...>
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 3:04 PM

 

Dear Mike
 
Is there any policy as to how you classify a SNP as a private or family SNP?  Presumably just one individual or family name has it.
 
The reason for the question is that it could seem to correlate with the standardisation of surnames in any given country.  As more people test - and more surnames have their deep ancestry explored ever deeper downwards - you must have a transition from SNPs which bridge hundreds or even thousands of surnames, down an ever tapering tree until you get to private or family surname SNPs at the bottom.  It is just when this standardisation of surnames occurs which can be quite variable.
 
So there must be a natural gradation in SNP frequency - and the hope must be that they will coalesce with the STR patterns going backwards.  So should ISOGG be recording these family SNPs on the ISOGG tree, as one day some might bridge more than the one surname, or will that all become too cumbersome - both in recording and nomenclature terms?
 
Brian
 
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:R1b1c_ U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of mtmaddi
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106- S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade
 

Eldon Wade just posted over at dna-forums.org about a change in ISOGG's Haplogroup R tree that affects R1b-U106. ISOGG has now added a new subclade of L48, defined by L148, with the name R1b1b2a1a1d2. You can see this at http://www.isogg. org/tree/ ISOGG_HapgrpR09. html

L148 was discovered in Eldon's WTY results. It's offered on the Advanced Orders menu and has been found positive in two other R1b-L48 men. Since the three R1b-L148 men all have different surnames, that was sufficient for ISOGG to regard this as a new subclade and not as a private or family SNP.

Congratulations, Eldon!

Mike Maddi



#2332 From: Brent Richards <brent.richards77@...>
Date: Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:46 am
Subject: Re: R1b-L148 now an official subclade
brent_troy_r...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
My surname Richards comes from some hitherto unexplained NPE scenario, probably 100-300 years ago.  I know this because, among other details, I match about 30 men of the surname Rutledge.  What is interesting for me is that, of the dozen who have tested to 67 markers, I have a GD from them ranging from 3 to 8.  One, whose GD is 5, has the same SNPs as me (L44+, L163+, L46-, L45-).  It's likely that the GD 8 fellows, and others who haven't yet upgraded to 67 markers who have an even larger GD from me, also have the same SNP profile: L44+, L46-.  As far as I know no other testers have this SNP profile to date.  So in a sense, for now the Rutledges probably have a sort of "SNP signature".

The surname appears in the 1400s having probably mutated from an earlier borders name of the 1300s.  I'm not sure what a GD of 8 means in years, if anyone has a rough idea I'd like to know.  So in a sense I would actually like the option of FTDNA to show the results of others with the same surname who match below 60/67.

Cheers
Brent R


On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:04 AM, brian swann <bps@...> wrote:


Dear Mike
 
Is there any policy as to how you classify a SNP as a private or family SNP?  Presumably just one individual or family name has it.
 
The reason for the question is that it could seem to correlate with the standardisation of surnames in any given country.  As more people test - and more surnames have their deep ancestry explored ever deeper downwards - you must have a transition from SNPs which bridge hundreds or even thousands of surnames, down an ever tapering tree until you get to private or family surname SNPs at the bottom.  It is just when this standardisation of surnames occurs which can be quite variable.
 
So there must be a natural gradation in SNP frequency - and the hope must be that they will coalesce with the STR patterns going backwards.  So should ISOGG be recording these family SNPs on the ISOGG tree, as one day some might bridge more than the one surname, or will that all become too cumbersome - both in recording and nomenclature terms?
 
Brian
 

#2331 From: "brian swann" <bps@...>
Date: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:04 pm
Subject: RE: R1b-L148 now an official subclade
swann46
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Mike
 
Is there any policy as to how you classify a SNP as a private or family SNP?  Presumably just one individual or family name has it.
 
The reason for the question is that it could seem to correlate with the standardisation of surnames in any given country.  As more people test - and more surnames have their deep ancestry explored ever deeper downwards - you must have a transition from SNPs which bridge hundreds or even thousands of surnames, down an ever tapering tree until you get to private or family surname SNPs at the bottom.  It is just when this standardisation of surnames occurs which can be quite variable.
 
So there must be a natural gradation in SNP frequency - and the hope must be that they will coalesce with the STR patterns going backwards.  So should ISOGG be recording these family SNPs on the ISOGG tree, as one day some might bridge more than the one surname, or will that all become too cumbersome - both in recording and nomenclature terms?
 
Brian
 
-----Original Message-----
From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mtmaddi
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 4:11 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R1b-L148 now an official subclade
 

Eldon Wade just posted over at dna-forums.org about a change in ISOGG's Haplogroup R tree that affects R1b-U106. ISOGG has now added a new subclade of L48, defined by L148, with the name R1b1b2a1a1d2. You can see this at http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR09.html

L148 was discovered in Eldon's WTY results. It's offered on the Advanced Orders menu and has been found positive in two other R1b-L48 men. Since the three R1b-L148 men all have different surnames, that was sufficient for ISOGG to regard this as a new subclade and not as a private or family SNP.

Congratulations, Eldon!

Mike Maddi


#2330 From: "mtmaddi" <mtmaddi@...>
Date: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:10 pm
Subject: R1b-L148 now an official subclade
mtmaddi
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Eldon Wade just posted over at dna-forums.org about a change in ISOGG's
Haplogroup R tree that affects R1b-U106. ISOGG has now added a new subclade of
L48, defined by L148, with the name R1b1b2a1a1d2. You can see this at
http://www.isogg.org/tree/ISOGG_HapgrpR09.html

L148 was discovered in Eldon's WTY results. It's offered on the Advanced Orders
menu and has been found positive in two other R1b-L48 men. Since the three
R1b-L148 men all have different surnames, that was sufficient for ISOGG to
regard this as a new subclade and not as a private or family SNP.

Congratulations, Eldon!

Mike Maddi

#2329 From: debbiekennett@...
Date: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:38 pm
Subject: Journal of Genetic Genealogy
debbiek3uk
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The autumn/fall issue of the Journal of Genetic  Genealogy is now available
  online:

http://www.jogg.info/52/index.html

There is an interesting  interview with Bennett Greenspan of Family Tree
DNA. Anyone with an interest in  surname studies will find Chris Pomery's
article of interest. There are also a  number of highly technical articles for
advanced researchers.

Debbie  Kennett

#2328 From: Michael Maddi <mtmaddi@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: Re: L199 & L217 status
mtmaddi
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
No. I haven't tested for that and don't plan to.

That's because L199 was found in Vince Tilroe's WTY results. He's L48- and I'm L48+.

Mike

--- On Wed, 11/18/09, dunbarsdna <dunbardna@...> wrote:

From: dunbarsdna <dunbardna@...>
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] Re: L199 & L217 status
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 5:47 AM

 

I think Mike Maddi was testing for L199. Has that result come back yet?

Debra Dunbar Nowell

--- In R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com, "Gary" <b424r560@.. .> wrote:
>
> Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?
>
> Gary Blakely
>



#2327 From: "dunbarsdna" <dunbardna@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:47 am
Subject: Re: L199 & L217 status
dunbarsdna
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I think Mike Maddi was testing for L199.  Has that result come back yet?

Debra Dunbar Nowell


--- In R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com, "Gary" <b424r560@...> wrote:
>
> Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?
>
> Gary Blakely
>

#2326 From: "Gary & Ann Blakely" <b424r560@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:10 am
Subject: RE: L199 & L217 status
garyrayblakely
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

John,

 

These are not 23andMe SNP’s. L199 was found in FTDNA’s WTY in Vince Tilroe; I assume the 2nd guy is his dad. L217 is a mystery but is listed under U106*. These are the 2 newest U106+ & L48- SNP’s and can be ordered in FTDNA’s Advanced Orders.

 

See Thomas Krahn’s tree:

http://ytree.ftdna.com/index.php?name=Draft&parent=99812722

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John German
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 6:22 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 

 

Can I find these in my 23andMe results? How?

Gary & Ann Blakely wrote:

Well I guess I will answer my own question! A good source tells me that one person has tested positive for L217 and 2 people have tested positive for L199.

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:25 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 

 

Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?

Gary Blakely


#2325 From: John German <german@...>
Date: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:22 am
Subject: Re: L199 & L217 status
germyn
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Can I find these in my 23andMe results? How?

Gary & Ann Blakely wrote:

Well I guess I will answer my own question! A good source tells me that one person has tested positive for L217 and 2 people have tested positive for L199.

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:25 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 

 

Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?

Gary Blakely


#2324 From: "mgxnq" <john@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:33 pm
Subject: Re: L199 & L217 status
mgxnq
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com, "Gary & Ann Blakely" <b424r560@...>
wrote:
>
> Well I guess I will answer my own question! A good source tells me that one
> person has tested positive for L217 and 2 people have tested positive for
> L199.

Are those positives outside the U106x WTY project membership ?

As you probably know, there is a table of known SNP test results for their
members here:

  http://www.familytreedna.com/public/R-U106xL48WTY/default.aspx

--
John

#2323 From: Paul Roche <proche195@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:38 pm
Subject: Re: L199 & L217 status
proche195
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I am negative for those at least compared to my review of my WTY results...

Paul Roche


From: Pissens Ronald <Ronald@...>
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, November 17, 2009 3:23:09 PM
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 

Hi  Gary,

 

Thanks for the question and the answer J

 

 

Ronald

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Gary & Ann Blakely
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 7:07 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106- S21] L199 & L217 status

 




Well I guess I will answer my own question! A good source tells me that one person has tested positive for L217 and 2 people have tested positive for L199.

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:25 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106- S21] L199 & L217 status

 

 

Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?

Gary Blakely



#2322 From: "Pissens Ronald" <Ronald@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:23 pm
Subject: RE: L199 & L217 status
rp195120042000
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi  Gary,

 

Thanks for the question and the answer J

 

 

Ronald

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary & Ann Blakely
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 7:07 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 




Well I guess I will answer my own question! A good source tells me that one person has tested positive for L217 and 2 people have tested positive for L199.

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:25 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 

 

Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?

Gary Blakely


#2321 From: "Gary & Ann Blakely" <b424r560@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:07 pm
Subject: RE: L199 & L217 status
garyrayblakely
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Well I guess I will answer my own question! A good source tells me that one person has tested positive for L217 and 2 people have tested positive for L199.

 

Gary Blakely

 


From: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com [mailto:R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:25 PM
To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] L199 & L217 status

 

 

Is there any new news on these two new L48- U106 SNP's?

Gary Blakely


#2320 From: "sandgrikes" <clinton.platt@...>
Date: Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Subject: Phylogeography R1b1b2 (R-M269) in Europe ?
sandgrikes
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Has anyone heard anymore about this paper? Specifically when or if it's going to be issued.

In the middle of May this year it was intimated that F. Cruciani et al. would be publishing a paper towards the end of the year entitled "Phylogeography of human Y chromosome haplogroup R1b1b2 (R-M269) in Europe"

Here's the abstract:

The human Y chromosome haplogroup R1b1b2 (R-M269) displays an extremely wide geographic distribution within Europe, with a decreasing frequency cline from Iberia (frequencies up to 90%) towards the Balkans (usually less than 10%). Previous studies have proposed that the observed R1b1b2 frequency cline is due to a population expansion from an Iberian Ice-age refugium after the LGM (Malaspina et al. 1998; Semino et al. 2000).

In this study, we explored the phylogeography of the human Y chromosome haplogroup R1b1b2 by analyzing more than 2,000 males from Europe. The haplogroup-defining marker M269 (Cruciani et al. 2002), and two additional internal markers (U106 and U152, Sims et al 2007) which identify internal branches (R1b1b2g and R1b1b2h) were analyzed. The paragroup R1b1b2*(xR1b1b2g, R1b1b2h) and the haplogroups R1b1b2g and R1b1b2h showed quite different frequency distribution patterns within Europe, with frequency peaks in the Iberian Peninsula, northern Europe and northern Italy/France, respectively. The overall frequency pattern of R1b1b2 haplogroup is suggestive of multiple events of migration and expansion within Europe rather than a single and uniform spread of people from an Iberian Ice-age refugium.

References:

Malaspina et al. (1998) Am J Hum Genet 63:847-860
Semino et al. (2000) Science 290:1155-1159
Cruciani et al. (2002) Am J Hum Genet 70:1197-1214
Sims et al. (2007) Hum Mutat 28:97


#2319 From: "Morgane et Edouard SIMON" <gabouc@...>
Date: Sun Nov 8, 2009 10:35 am
Subject: Re: R-U106 group website results tables back on-line
gabouc
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Sorry, I mean David, not Charles...
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R-U106 group website results tables back on-line

Hello Charles,
Thanks for the update.
I am Edouard SIMON, part of L47 guys group.
Unfortunately most of my markers have been erased during this update.
Please let me know if you need me to send them again or not.
Cheers,
Edouard
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 2:06 AM
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R-U106 group website results tables back on-line

 

Good Evening,
 
The R-U106 group website results tables are back on-line.  You will need to update any bookmarks you have to the various embedded tables.  You can do so by visiting the group website and following the various links on the Results tab, or you can edit the old links by replacing
 
"geocities.com/R1b1c9"
 
with
 
"weston-genealogy.net/R_U106"
 
If you find any broken links in the tables or on the results page please let me know off-line.
 
Thank you.
 
Cheers, David.
 
David Weston
 
Group Co-Administrator
R1b-U106/S21+ Research Group
 
Group Administrator
East Anglia Geographic DNA Project
 


#2318 From: "Morgane et Edouard SIMON" <gabouc@...>
Date: Sun Nov 8, 2009 10:32 am
Subject: Re: R-U106 group website results tables back on-line
gabouc
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Charles,
Thanks for the update.
I am Edouard SIMON, part of L47 guys group.
Unfortunately most of my markers have been erased during this update.
Please let me know if you need me to send them again or not.
Cheers,
Edouard
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 2:06 AM
Subject: [R1b1c_U106-S21] R-U106 group website results tables back on-line

 

Good Evening,
 
The R-U106 group website results tables are back on-line.  You will need to update any bookmarks you have to the various embedded tables.  You can do so by visiting the group website and following the various links on the Results tab, or you can edit the old links by replacing
 
"geocities.com/R1b1c9"
 
with
 
"weston-genealogy.net/R_U106"
 
If you find any broken links in the tables or on the results page please let me know off-line.
 
Thank you.
 
Cheers, David.
 
David Weston
 
Group Co-Administrator
R1b-U106/S21+ Research Group
 
Group Administrator
East Anglia Geographic DNA Project
 


Messages 2318 - 2347 of 2347   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help