Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
R1b1c_U106-S21 · R1b1c_U106-S21_Haplogroup
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1 - 30 of 2315   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1
Hello all, First let me say thanks to our admins for setting up what is already a succesful R1b1c9 project at FTDNA. Thanks. My question: Is there a...
TENSAWMAC@...
bamaboy177
Offline Send Email
Apr 11, 2008
11:26 pm
2
... already a succesful R1b1c9 project at FTDNA. Thanks. ... sequences, along with any R1b1c9s who have tested at DeCodeMe that a SNP can be found that splits...
Ralph Cake
ralph_cake
Offline Send Email
Apr 11, 2008
11:44 pm
3
Ralph, I hate to hear that. Especially since you are so close to me. I was hoping that your results might provide us a "McMillan SNP" and that other results so...
TENSAWMAC@...
bamaboy177
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
12:20 am
4
One thing is that the deCODEme results for yDNA SNPs are not exhaustive. They test for the nucleotide at 859 locations on the y chromosome. I believe I've read...
Michael Maddi
mtmaddi
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
12:41 am
5
Perhaps the full sequences of Watson and Ventner put us R1b1c9s a step ahead in the WOY? I hope so. -Robert ... From: Michael Maddi <mtmaddi@...> To:...
TENSAWMAC@...
bamaboy177
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
12:45 am
6
As of this moment, it looks like all but a few R1b-M269 (old R1b1c) guys will either be positive for the new rs34276300 / S116 SNP, or otherwise will be DYS...
Charles Moore
cdmo29
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
12:46 am
7
I have discovered that the Wikipedia article on Haplogroup R1b is in the process of being edited (to contain the new nomenclature - R1b1b2...) There still...
Raymond T. Wing
wing_genealo...
Online Now Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
2:04 pm
8
Thanks. The revised link isn't in place yet. I hope they don't do so until the new nomenclature has been published, which could still be a while yet. I am...
David Weston
thurlowons
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
2:31 pm
9
I'd like to add my own thanks to the administrators for setting up the R1b1c9 project!! I'm very confident that lots of 'clarity' will come from focusing on...
carolvass1942
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
3:44 pm
10
What determines Frisian/non Frisian? Thanks. Danny Barksdale Kit 52078 ... From: carolvass1942 To: R1b1c_U106-S21@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, April 12,...
Danny Barksdale
db14399
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
3:53 pm
11
Danny: I'm not sure I know the complete answer. Here is what Ken Nordveldt told me about my brother's results [ysearch TRYKD], and a further comment by David...
carolvass1942
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
4:23 pm
12
I have read with interest all of the links created on the FT DNA U106 site.(Thanks so very much for posting them). As a layman, I had some difficulty wading...
Raymond T. Wing
wing_genealo...
Online Now Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
4:54 pm
13
Raymond, I noticed that R1b had a range of DYS458 values from 14 to 20. From a batch of 361 R1b's at Ysearch, the numbers from 4 to 20 were :- 14 3 15 9 16...
bob_bootle
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
7:03 pm
14
I realize that R1b had a range of DYS458 values from 14 to 20, so it is quite possible that my family does not fall into the DYS458.2 this paper was referring...
Raymond Wing
wing_genealo...
Online Now Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
7:39 pm
15
Ray, Unlike SMGF, FTDNA does not report partial YSTR repeats nor is YSearch configured to allow entry of such. You could well have a value of 19.2 at DY458...
David Weston
thurlowons
Offline Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
11:01 pm
16
I was able to search the SMGF database by inputting the 6 most stable alleles from the U106 FT DNA project (each one with 95% or more participants sharing the...
Raymond Wing
wing_genealo...
Online Now Send Email
Apr 12, 2008
11:12 pm
17
I have a?question to ask of some of the more knowledgeable folks on this list. Ever since my McMillans have tested positive for S21, we have sort of wondered...
TENSAWMAC@...
bamaboy177
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
5:59 am
18
Greetings, fellow R1b1c9ers, Just letting you know that I am looking to go for the "Walk on the Y" this summer if possible....I match a large collection of...
dkbk@...
debrashifrakatz
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
5:24 pm
19
That's a good point about trimming excess previous postings when replying. That's what I've done below, as an example. I deleted Debra's first paragraph, about...
Michael Maddi
mtmaddi
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
5:42 pm
20
Dear All, I agree with Michael Maddi's comments on this topic. In the short term I think that the FTDNA Walk on Y project offers the best option for...
timjanzen1
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
6:00 pm
21
Dear All, I agree with Michael Maddi's comments on this topic. In the short term I think that the FTDNA Walk on Y project offers the best option for ...
Tim Janzen
timjanzen1
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
6:00 pm
22
I agree that it is very interesting that McMillan Group 1 is U106+. I suggest that one of the testers who is U106+ at FTDNA, get the advanced page test called...
Charles Moore
cdmo29
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
6:00 pm
23
Robert, By my reckoning, your most distinguishing marker is DYS438 = 11. U106 is strongly modal (~91%) at DYS438 = 12, and is one the slower markers in the...
David Weston
thurlowons
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
6:39 pm
24
FTDNA's Thomas Krahn's Walk on the Y (WOY) project is going to be expensive for participating testers. It might be a good idea if a selected few of us, with a...
Charles Moore
cdmo29
Offline Send Email
Apr 13, 2008
6:47 pm
25
Thanks David and Charles for your evaluations. You both mentioned several points that I had not picked up on. Many Thanks! We have had a member of group1 test...
TENSAWMAC@...
bamaboy177
Offline Send Email
Apr 14, 2008
2:05 am
26
Dear All I am new to this list - but can trace one line of my Picton ancestry back by paper documentation to pre-1300 in Wales/Pembrokeshire. They are...
swann46
Offline Send Email
Apr 14, 2008
4:27 am
27
Testing for S116 is unlikely to be helpful for anyone who is S21 positive. So far, no one who is S21 positive has been shown to be positive for S116. See...
Tim Janzen
timjanzen1
Offline Send Email
Apr 14, 2008
5:23 am
28
Dear Tim, All Thanks for your helpful reply. Can you confirm for me what you consider to be "an unusual haplotype" for R1b1c9? If it helps I can send you an...
brian swann
swann46
Offline Send Email
Apr 14, 2008
8:08 am
29
Charles, Further to your comments on DYS447= 24 and 25, I see that the 'S21+ null425 Project' members are largely DYS447=24. 45 of 54 = 83% at DYS447=24, and 9...
bob_bootle
Offline Send Email
Apr 14, 2008
2:14 pm
30
Yes. In Haplogroup I, SNP M284 is associated with the null 425 phenomenon, which actually mutates a thymine to a cytosine at one of the DYF371X markers, to...
Charles Moore
cdmo29
Offline Send Email
Apr 14, 2008
2:25 pm
Messages 1 - 30 of 2315   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help