Hello, Sorry if this has been pointed out already. I haven't been following the list closely or any other lists at all due to other distractions. However, I...
Mike, I appreciate the Excel Spreadsheet you posted on the Onamastic Analysis of L48. However, the information you received from Ancestry regarding the...
Dear Mark, it was so kind of you to offer that important oorrections! Thank you very much. I corrected the file as you wrote. It was so great if everybody do...
I have placed a one-page landscape spreadsheet, with an additional page of notes, in this yahoogroup's Files section. In the alpha list, it is called...
Dear Mike & David (or whoever is tracking the L48 results): I ordered my brother's L48 test on Feb. 19. He is in Batch 296 and my memory is that the...
Hi Carol, There are quite a few members waiting for results in the 296 batch and at least one in 295. The results for 296 are due today. Cheers, Dan To:...
The R1b-L48-WTY Project (Walk Through the Y) is officially up and running. At the current time, we have 3 self-funded NOT nulls, and 2 self-funded null 425s...
If the Frisian model is U106/L48+, does this mean that... as the U106 is further characterized that different group projects will arise to reflect the ever...
It is theoretically possible. If the WTY for L48+ discovers a SNP that all of them share, but which is actually ancestral to L48, but descendant of U106, then...
Congratulations, Owen. You are now in a group with only a handful of known members. I would like to thank you and Brian for your interest in the WTY project....
Dear Dan and other administrators of R-U108: I know that a bunch of L48 results came back yesterday. Do you have a count on how many results from both rounds...
Carol, If you go to the FTDNA Project "Results" page, scroll down to "Haplotype Comparisons" and then click on "R-U106x(L1-,U198-,L48-)", you will get a list...
I put an L47 subclade modal and a few comments into this group's Files section, in the alpha list under L47. There are just a few little interesting tempting...
On 9th April Family Tree advises I have tested L47+ ...... R1b1b2a1a4 >>>> L1- L46- L47+ L48+ L5- L6- M126- M153- M160- M173+ M18- M207+ M222- M269+ M343+ M37-...
Hi Clinton Can you please help me. I am not able to find "Project Results" If you could give me some direction I would appreciate it Thanks Larry Chamberlain,...
Again, based on very preliminary data from a small handful, it is nevertheless interesting that the modal value for L48 NOT nulls is 449=29. All of the L47+...
Thank you for so interesting results. Could you please to explain how many people are in the L47+ group which you mean? Hokanson (no Venter), Rogov, Picton and...
Christopher, Short answer is no. Unless FTDNA changes its current policy, which they agreed upon with us as Group Administrators, there will be no further...
What dou you think about the idea that 1) L46-, L47+ have 389=11, 389-2=28, 464d=18, 456>15, 576=17, 481=23 2) L46+ probably means 391=10, 389-2=29, 464d=17,...
I have been in touch in the recent past with the female relative who is handling the testing for the Venter you mention, kit 109845. She confirmed to me that...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
