Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RFT · Relational Frame Theory
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1605 - 1634 of 2402   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
1605
Hello all! Any info about the new book. My netbookstore removed my order for the book which should have been released now and they don't list the title ...
storjorden
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2007
10:08 pm
1606
DK The book is out ... I have copies. It is on Amazon US, both paper and hardback - S Steven C. Hayes Foundation Professor Department of Psychology /298 ...
Steven C. Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
2:14 am
1607
Like all approaches to theory that value science and are responsive to the ongoing flow of empirical data, ACT is a 'work in progress' when it comes to pinning...
J. T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 20, 2007
9:21 am
1608
¡Aleluya hermanos! Ha salido la actualización 2007 de nuestra página web http://www.conductitlan.net (es la neta). Estas invitado para surfear en ella. ...
psic. jorge everardo ...
jorgeever
Offline Send Email
Feb 21, 2007
5:27 pm
1609
Well, as has been said, this is in play and that is good. For now, what do I mean by fusion/defusion? Well, I think that *fusion is the dominance of particular...
Kelly Wilson
kwilson@...
Send Email
Feb 21, 2007
8:46 pm
1610
I will respond in bits and pieces because I just can't swallow this thread all at once. Joseph C. said: Yet.....to echo J.t.'s arguments... If fusion and...
Kelly Wilson
kwilson@...
Send Email
Feb 21, 2007
8:57 pm
1611
These seem right on Here is my problem with fusion. If fusion is JUST transformation of stimulus functions then there is almost always "fusion" I think of...
Steven C. Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Feb 21, 2007
9:48 pm
1612
Hi Kel- ... I think it's important to start with identifying some apparent inconsistencies with how defusion/fusion has been discussed in ACT publications, and...
JT Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
2:05 am
1613
Hi Steve- I think the reply I just now posted to Kelly's email speaks to much of what you say here (i.e., you might want to read that post first before reading...
JT Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
3:00 am
1614
Just on this point: So, on the one hand, I have the thought that "I am a piece of crap" and it is TRUE, nothing else exists but that, and that TRUTH organizes...
Kelly Wilson
kwilson@...
Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
3:00 am
1615
Hi Kelly-- I'm not sure how this example reflects the perspective I've offered (guess you could say "I'm having the thought that I'm confused"). I'd call the...
JT Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
4:19 am
1616
This thread is fascinating, and it just brought up this question for me: It's about the 'leaves on a stream' exercise. It's a 'classic' defusion technique -...
Russ Harris
harris_russ
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
5:29 am
1617
Ha ha-this is a good thought! I guess it depends on the contingencies behind the image of leaves on a stream-if verbal processes are tapped into to 'create...
JT Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
5:45 am
1618
If fusion only means, "take something seriously" then the "problem" turns on the workability of what is being taken seriously in the context in which it is...
robbhb@...
robbhb
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
5:53 am
1619
Incidentally--What if adding "I'm having the thought that..." in front of a problematic thought got some or all of its bump entirely through reframing, and not...
J. T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
7:28 am
1620
I would like to contribute three further points: (1) JT writes in his recent article “cognitive fusion refers to contexts where verbal transformations of...
raisonn@...
dimanche572003
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
9:22 am
1621
I think your question shows the problem in defining defusion/fusion simply in terms of verbal processes ... as does Russ's leaves on the stream. If you follow...
Steven C. Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
6:37 pm
1622
... I struggled with this issue heavily when writing the paper (e.g., the "milk" exercise, or saying things very slowly or very quickly, etc., all seem to...
J. T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
9:50 pm
1623
Yeah ... I do what to tell folks that J T's paper is really cool ... very helpful. We had a chapter to write on defusion recently and used his organizational...
Steven C. Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
10:32 pm
1624
... Amen, brother. Best, JT J. T. Blackledge, Ph. D. Lecturer University of Wollongong New South Wales, Australia...
J. T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
10:34 pm
1625
Steve-- I actually couldn't disagree with you more on this one. I think it gets at a fundamental (though I agree, a very difficult to parse out) issue at the...
J. T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 22, 2007
10:39 pm
1626
Hi JT -- I appreciate your struggle with this stuff. I'm not convinced that this debate will be resolved by talking in terms of verbal vs. non-verbal....
John P Forsyth
drjohnforsyth
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
4:39 am
1627
Hi John-- My apologies if I've misinterpreted the second sentence of your post, but I'm hoping by this point that it's clear I have not been advocating a...
J. T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
5:35 am
1628
Re: One of my key points in this thread is that there are plenty of contexts in which it is highly FUNCTIONAL to over-identify with thinking and to lose the...
patty bach
patb6488
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
8:59 am
1629
Hi JT, Steve JT wrote: In the second case, one would readily imagine there's reframing happening (e.g., establishing a frame of distinction between "I" and "my...
raisonn@...
dimanche572003
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
9:13 am
1630
Hi Patty, I totally agree with you. I never said what you seem to think I said. I think what's happened is you've got 2 different threads mixed up. In one ...
Russ Harris
harris_russ
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
9:23 am
1631
*Warning! Warning! Long! Probably not everyone's cup of tea.* * Response embedded in italics: * *Raisonn@... wrote:* ... /*Kelly wrote: *//I would cut it...
Kelly Wilson
kwilson@...
Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
9:24 am
1632
See, you really lost me here man. Watching thoughts as leaves on a stream is not defusion. Just fusion with other verbal stuff? You keeps saying that fusion...
Kelly Wilson
kwilson@...
Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
9:36 am
1633
Geeez - here I am replying to myself. Yipes! Please, please please do not understand me to be saying you are wrong or should stop talking. I think this...
Kelly Wilson
kwilson@...
Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
10:49 am
1634
I know it when I see it. This discussion is helping me to clarify my understanding of fusion, and perhaps even improve my ability to spot it during therapy ...
Patrick C Quinn
pquinnphd
Offline Send Email
Feb 23, 2007
12:13 pm
Messages 1605 - 1634 of 2402   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help