Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RFT · Relational Frame Theory
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 76 - 105 of 2402   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
76
I have red this RFT-book and I am sold. I am an welfare-nurse coming from that traditional behavior analysis branche in Norway and wish this pragmatic and...
Rune Tverberg
runetverberg@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2003
8:40 pm
77
Rune - I would not have said it was a good idea to invent too many (deictic) relations. The object here is to describe patterns of relational responding with...
Bryan T. Roche
bryanthomasr...
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2003
9:26 am
78
Hi Rune -- I think you raise an interesting question, but in my view it collapses into an empirical issue. In principle, the number of relational frames is...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2003
11:42 am
79
Perhaps the difference, therefore, is that values in Buddhism are proscribed a priori (thus enters some element of dogmatism), whereas ACT seeks to help the...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2003
3:49 pm
80
There are as many relations as we can imagine (by definition, if you think about it). From an RFT perspective I think it is good to keep the number of types or...
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 4, 2003
4:28 pm
81
Dear researchers! Thank you for those generous answers! I should know. Your book doesn't refer to Relational frames as if they where tecnical terms but uses...
Rune Tverberg
runetverberg@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2003
6:13 pm
82
Dear researchers! Thank you for those generous answers! I should know. Your book doesn't refer to Relational frames as if they where tecnical terms, but uses...
Rune Tverberg
runetverberg@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2003
11:08 pm
83 ACT
ACT@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
1:00 am
84
In the philosophy world in which I grew up the word "value" meant "a justified preference." That is why humans have values and other animals do not. However,...
robbhb@...
robbhb03
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
5:47 am
85
However, and this is extremely important, relational frames are analytic tools, not ontological categories. OK, I do get they are not ontological categories...
robbhb@...
robbhb03
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
5:56 am
86
Not sure about this at all. 1. I don't think values are based on justification -- when pushed on what you value "just 'cause" is the ultimate justification...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
11:58 am
87
Maybe, maybe not. Don't really care that much! Dermot ... Dermot Barnes-Holmes Professor of Psychology and Head of Department Department of Psychology ...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
11:58 am
88
Hank write: OK, I do get they are not ontological categories but when one relationally frames one is engaging in an action of an empirical sort - right? We may...
Kelly G. Wilson, Ph.D.
kwilson@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
12:54 pm
89
No. There is no event. YOU divided it into "an action." But the actual stream of actions is indivisible without a divider. Even "objects" or not things. Where...
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
4:03 pm
90
I now see a 4th way to get multiple messages. Hank cced this to both RFT and ACT lists, but posted it to the RFT list. That way of ccing means it goes to RFT...
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
4:11 pm
91
A list member just sent me a generic question folks should know about. I will cross list this to the ACT and RFT lists so (sigh) some of you will get this very...
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
4:20 pm
92
Hi All: I have been meaning to send this to the list for comment. One of my colleagues at Oregon Research Institute, Keith Smolkowski, sent me his concerns...
Shawn Boles
himself222000
Offline Send Email
Jun 5, 2003
11:11 pm
93
I've not yet met a DI person who likes RFT. To my mind, so much the worse for DI. I sat down with Ziggy 8-9 years ago and walked him through RFT, suggesting...
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
12:26 am
94
Since I wrote some of the stuff on the "advantages of RFT" page to which Keith is referring, am particularly interested in the application of RFT to education,...
Eric Fox
arizonaeric
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
12:51 am
95
I personally find the following quote from Keith rather brazen: "A good DI teacher can nearly always predict the way kids have learned misrules, and they can...
John T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
1:27 am
96
I was just about to reply to the DI post, when I read Steve's and JT's replies (given the time difference we're always 8 hours+ behind US exchanges on the...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
10:19 am
97
Yikes--looking back at my post I find my quotes rather brazen. Sorry folks (especially Keith, if you're out there)--chalk it up to indigestion and...
John T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
3:41 pm
98
Yikes--looking back on this, I find my quotes rather brazen. Sorry, folks (especially Keith, if you're out there)--chalk it up to indigestion and...
John T. Blackledge
blackled2000
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
3:49 pm
99
Just reread my answer. While the substance is fine, the tone is awfully grouchy. Sorry about that ... my kids can tell you I was grouchy all day long. Tired....
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 6, 2003
4:52 pm
100
Curiously, since I am interested in ACT/RFT I also had an interest in DI and the constructional approach of Israel Goldiamond (BTW his key paper is now ...
raisonn@...
dimanche572003
Offline Send Email
Jun 7, 2003
9:20 am
101
I certainly agree with the need for greater cooperation (see previous post on this). In fact, this is already underway. And this should not be surprising --...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 10, 2003
2:32 pm
102
... I don't recall much response to this one. It's still in my email list, so I'll go ahead and responsd. It could be counterpliance but it could be (and seems...
Steve Hayes
unrpsych
Offline Send Email
Jun 10, 2003
11:29 pm
103
I recall reading some posts a while back about the best way to get to the Swedish conference, but I really wasn't paying too much attention at the time. Can...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 13, 2003
3:13 pm
104
Dermot, ... But I don't know if Ryanair fly to Stockholm-Skavsta from Dublin... talk soon, simon. ... -- Dr Simon Dymond, BCBA Senior Lecturer in Behavioural...
Simon Dymond
zorroesque
Offline Send Email
Jun 13, 2003
3:24 pm
105
Just a note to say thanks to everyone who got back to me re. travel to Sweden. See ya all there! D. Dermot Barnes-Holmes Professor of Psychology and Head of...
Dermot Barnes-Holmes
dermot.barnes-holmes@...
Send Email
Jun 13, 2003
3:48 pm
Messages 76 - 105 of 2402   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help