Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RSS2-Support
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Formal specification of RSS 2.0   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #288 of 807 |
As you may know, I've been interested for some time in standardizing
RSS, as well as registering a media type for it (application/rss+xml).

For a while, I pursued the RSS1.0 path, mostly because I was
interested in the Semantic Web for other projects as well.

Over time, however, I've become convinced that RDF isn't right for
RSS, at least not in the forseeable future. Given that RSS 2.0 is the
latest-and-greatest of the *other* branch of RSS, it seems appropriate
to try something in that direction.

So, I've generated an Internet-Draft that documents the RSS 2.0 format
as described by Dave, in a more formal fashion (so it's suitable for
submission to the IETF).

The intent here is to document the format so that it can be referenced
by the media type registration (this was the problem when we tried
before; they wouldn't recognize a URL as a reference) as well as other
specs.

It is NOT the intent to change or "improve" the format in ANY way;
documents that are conformant with Dave's documentation should be
conformant with this document, and vice versa. It's ONLY to provide a
reference that's stable in the standards world's eyes. The intent
isn't to make this developer-friendly; Dave has already done an
excellent job there.

So, I'd like to enlist this community's help in assuring that it is
indeed functionally equivalent to Dave's spec. Once that happens, it
can be submitted to be published as an Informational RFC, and we get a
media type registration (which means that browsers and servers are
more likely to accommodate the format over time).

See:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-rss2-00.txt

Cheers,




Fri Apr 18, 2003 7:08 pm

mnotting
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #288 of 807 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

As you may know, I've been interested for some time in standardizing RSS, as well as registering a media type for it (application/rss+xml). For a while, I...
Mark Nottingham
mnotting
Offline Send Email
Apr 18, 2003
7:08 pm

... I think this is just great. This is the perfect next step for RSS 2.0. Thanks! Sjoerd...
Sjoerd Visscher
sjoerd_visscher
Offline Send Email
Apr 18, 2003
9:07 pm

I'm thrilled to see a formal RFC for RSS2. I've only recently started getting into RSS, and while the existing documentation has been great, I felt like there...
Allen Firstenberg
rss@...
Send Email
Apr 19, 2003
1:46 am

... I applaud the effort to get RSS formally specified and a MIME type registered. ... Moving back from an RDF based, namespace aware scheme to essentially RSS...
Klaus Johannes Rusch
krusch
Offline Send Email
Apr 25, 2003
5:59 pm

Your work toward formalization of RSS 2.0 is appreciated. I also recommend a W3C XML Schema for RSS 2.0. A human language specification will always be somewhat...
dbmmd
Online Now
Apr 28, 2003
2:42 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help