Don't be confused, Bud. This isn't brain surgery, this is fun.
Have a great life!
Take care,
Tony
Bud Starison wrote:
>
>
> Anthony Tripodi wrote:
> > I agree with Mr. Wodaski. And, no, you don't have to be the designer of
> > a 'scope to interpret a star test accurately. You do have to know what
> > you're doing.
> >
>
> You're confusing me Tony, on the one hand you say your Tak star tests
> perfect, but OTOH all these other people on the Tak group say theirs
> does not, and that this is normal. I do not see how both can be true.
>
> On the one hand you say that you agree with Mr. Wodaski, but Mr. Wodaski
> and others said that you had to know the exact particulars of a design
> and how it worked before you could know how to interpret the star test,
> but above you disagree with that after saying you agree with it!
>
> Regards,
>
> Bud
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
... You're confusing me Tony, on the one hand you say your Tak star tests perfect, but OTOH all these other people on the Tak group say theirs does not, and...
You didn't read the post very carefully, Bud. I said near perfect... "all but eliminated". Don't be confused, Bud. This isn't brain surgery, this is fun. Have...
... What I was referring to was the fact that your star test was no where near as skewed (or wasn't even considered off enough to be consider skewed at all!)...
A 5" at $9,000? Hell, I'd get the TOA 150 and pocket a couple hundred in change. But it makes the FS128 or the Pentax 125 look like an even better deal....
While I feel that Vic makes great scopes - based on the posts from his group, I don't consider his pricing or products - leading edge in either price or...
All I know... is that at the last 3 public gatherings I was at... there were an assortment of bigger and more expensive scopes including a 12 foot long D&G -...
Hey, Not to argue the point, but the ES website describes that 127's objective as containing a Hoya ED element and call the scope "...an air-spaced triplet ED...
Terminology is a source of mystery to me. My Vixen f/6.5 SS102 I am content to call an ED doublet. And it proclaims itself ED in big letters on the dew...
... Many refractors were sold as APO fifteen years ago that probably wouldn't be so labeled if sold today. My FS-128 is one, and my 178ED is another. Early...
As you probably know, ED stands for Extra-low Dispersion. Any modern apochromat almost certainly uses an ED element, either fluorite or a fluorcrown. Some...
... Does anyone know what kind of glass that Hoya element equates to in the Schott catalog? ... There are all kinds of "apos" out there, just throw 3 lenses in...
Most likley because they are not experienced enough to know what is going on? On one side of focus you are looking through turbulent air and the other side...
... That's what I thought Chris, but you sure could fool them! Many reported really skewed star tests and ain't the least bit phased by it all. I think Rod...
I agree there are all kinds of "apos" out there. As you know though they can and most likely will fail to meet the debated definition of an apo though. The...
Hey, Didn't the Tak Sky 90 II have problems holding collimation? Or were those folks just lyin'? Or was I jus hallooseinatin' from hittin' the coolaide? ...
Warp: While your comments are interesting, I have to say that comparing a SV or TV with "Explore Scientific" is not fair - I highly doubt that many of these...
If I think it through when I say an 8" apo is not cost effective it is a purely personal declaration of what size apertures I would like to have and what I'm...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
Offline 
Send Email