Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Refractors
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 27085 - 27114 of 27805   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
27085
I just got new eye glasses this week and got anti-reflection coatings to help reduce glare and eye strain since I spend so much time in an office at a...
chrisg3425
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
1:43 pm
27086
I'm interested to hear from people using the *standard losmandy tripod* on the G11 what kind of damping time they have with their refractors when they give...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
4:16 pm
27087
... Probably the best test is not damping time but deflection. Tie a string to the end of the focuser, attach a weight and set it swinging. Notice what the...
uncarollo2
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
8:12 pm
27088
Greg; With my TE$C 140 damping time is in the very short category, well under 1/4 second by my estimate even at high power. It makes the combo excellent to...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
8:21 pm
27089
I intend to do that since I have three setups (two EQ heads, three tripods) that would be interesting to measure. However, I'm just trying to get a rough idea...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
9:17 pm
27090
Basically you seem to be saying the damping time is too fast to measure. (& I thought you were a Stellarvue user or did I get that wrong or ya got both?)...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
9:19 pm
27091
My results are using a G11 on a permanent LeSeur pier with TEC140. I know it's not exactly what you're asking for. I used to focus with the camera attached,...
Paul K
paulkccd
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
9:33 pm
27092
... I ... measured ... 3 to 4 seconds is about right for most mounts. This is the time it takes for the image to stop moving and become diffraction limited. ...
uncarollo2
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
10:45 pm
27093
My curiosity on this topic is piqued by the extraordinary solidity of the G11/Berlbach/FS128. My "normal reference" is the C14. As Roland suggests, damping...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
2:24 am
27094
Greg, since this is such an important test, just go ahead and drive the spikes into the wood floor in the house ;-) That's what I did with my 200lbs...
Paul K
paulkccd
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
12:06 pm
27095
Wood is an excellent damping agent and should reduce the time that it takes to settle down. Metal always has more of a ringing quality to it and may vibrate a...
uncarollo2
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
2:42 pm
27096
Well I guess this will be interesting for all of us. I had hoped to do it with a PWT as well but no reason not to get started on the three tripods that I...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
9:11 pm
27097
I am going to sell on the 'mart a four inch Tak FS128 focuser with the microfocus 10:1 adapter and the Camera Angle Adjuster. I plan to sell as a unit because...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
9:17 pm
27098
... I had my Intes 6" Mak-Cass a G11. There was no damping time - really. I have back trouble and used to support myself by having one hand on the tripod. I...
Jim Johnson
jameswilliam...
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2008
1:27 am
27099
Greg; I have TEC, SV and Synta refractors. The TEC is the heaviest and longest tube assembly. Roland could well be correct about damping time but with the 140...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2008
6:51 am
27100
I often have a very heavy homemade 130 f/9.25 on a G-11 and have always considered it to be rock solid. Certainly never any noticeable issue with visual...
mrgrytt
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2008
3:56 pm
27101
I think so: computer-based star measurements are accurate to approximately 1/10 a pixel. For my setup, this represents theoretical precision of about 0.14...
Paul K
paulkccd
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2008
4:13 pm
27102
All the posts seem relatively sensible. I used a large number of configurations where a thwack to the tube shows a 1.5 to 3 second dampening time as shown by...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 3, 2008
6:29 pm
27103
here http://www.astromart.com/auctions/details.asp?auction_id=4305 thanks folks, Greg N...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2008
2:09 am
27104
Didn't any company show show off cheap 6" ED refractors yet? We have a world full of 80mm and 102mm stuff. Don...
glasspusher2001
Offline Send Email
May 7, 2008
2:15 pm
27105
Yes W.O. had a 6" out on display. But I don't see it on the web site? Am I wrongly remembering their 130mm? Greg N...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 7, 2008
4:11 pm
27106
... Is the W.O. a doublet? There's talk of a 140mm f/8.5 planetary hunter scope from Burgess. Don...
glasspusher2001
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
4:31 am
27107
Dunno, I'm afraid I'm not as informed as I should be about makes and models, without backup from the web sites I'm pretty useless. I find the idea of a 5.5...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
1:44 pm
27108
Greg, To widen the market and sell more telescopes, vendors are starting to break telescopes into significant "specialties." Do you now own a telescope...
Alan French
alandfrench
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
1:55 pm
27109
OHHHHHH those planets. For some reason I was thinking of planetary NEBULAE. Because you REALLY have to HUNT for those. It didn't even occur to me that one...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
2:06 pm
27110
... And that's a good thing. <g> Clear skies, Alan...
Alan French
alandfrench
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
2:41 pm
27111
... Greg: Whatever he calls it, it's a very nicely priced and well made refractor line?. My 80mm P.H. had well collimated, sharp optics and at high powers...
George
saarmason
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
7:16 pm
27112
... If it qualifies as Planet Hunter with only 80mm aperture, then at 140mm aperture Planet Killer might be a more appropriate name. Vahe...
vahe352
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
7:25 pm
27113
Well Don called it a planetary hunter. To me that means chasing after exploded stars. Since the bright ones like m86 are pretty easy it made me think of all...
gnowellsct
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
8:46 pm
27114
... Okey-dokey, then. I would think that means we would drop the term "Super-Planetary" from certain higher end refractors and eyepieces, Yes? Clear Skies, ...
Mark Vincent Costello...
markvcostello3
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2008
9:32 pm
Messages 27085 - 27114 of 27805   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help