Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
RoHS · RoHS & REACH Environmental Issues
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 335 - 364 of 968   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
335
All. I am in a little bit of a tiff with my engineering staff and am trolling for opinions. The crux of the problem is that they don't believe it is our ...
Jeff Caldwell
felinfoelus
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
5:45 pm
336
Is anyone familiar with "R5" and "R6" distinctions with respect to RoHS compliance. An aquaintaince was telling me that he believed that compliant products ...
Jeff Caldwell
felinfoelus
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
6:35 pm
337
Boots pleads guilty to WEEE breaches January 24, 2006 16:43 Boots Retail (Ireland) has become the first company in Ireland and the EU to be prosecuted for...
Ken Kapur
kenkapur
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
6:35 pm
338
All I may not be referring to the same thing as the acquaintance, but IT manufacturers often distinguish between "RoHS 6", and the "RoHS 5", for which the lead...
Mark Myles
m3myles
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
6:47 pm
339
Jeff, I'm seeing the use of the terms RoHS 5 and RoHS 6 being used on an increased basis due to the challenge of removing lead from electronics. Due to certain...
Kapur, Ken
kenkapur
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
6:54 pm
340
Mark That could very well be the case because this acquaintance is heavily involved in the server storage market, so the nomenclature is likely a product of...
Jeff Caldwell
felinfoelus
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
6:56 pm
341
I'm at a small electronics manufacturer making audio/video signal switching products. We have to be RoHS and one of the questions we have is do we have to...
etrasmussen
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
7:26 pm
342
Jeff Your products may or may not be covered by one of the exemptions. The fact that a product is rack mounted is immaterial - what applies to his products is...
Mark Myles
m3myles
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
7:44 pm
343
Mark, very helpful....thank you. Jeff ________________________________ From: RoHS@yahoogroups.com [mailto:RoHS@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Myles Sent:...
Jeff Caldwell
felinfoelus
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
7:49 pm
344
Jeff, see the attached annex . Taking advantage of note 7 is what we call "RoHS 5 of 6" . Scott ________________________________ From: RoHS@yahoogroups.com...
SCOTT CARDEN
scott_adtran
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2006
8:58 pm
345
... Basically, we've heard that lead-free solder pastes may require or desire a different cut out due to different properties (spread etc) and so we're not...
etrasmussen
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
12:11 am
346
We don't use CEMs but do purchase unpopulated pcbs to our design. Our fab notes specify laminate options to use and plating finish. We have avoided LF HASL as...
James, Chris
rohs06
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
9:25 am
347
You'll probably have to change the stencil apertures for LF paste, so from that aspect yes. If you find your existing apertures work ok for you then so long as...
James, Chris
rohs06
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
9:30 am
348
... signal ... we ... etc) ... you are right , as with all things RoHS you "may" have to change your current processes - or not you'll just have to suck it and...
paulefreeman
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
10:26 am
349
Jeff, You are on the right track here. The OEM determines the performance specs for the finished products and provides the warranty for workmanship. As a...
swifty846
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
1:40 pm
350
Thanks for the links. I have started checking both of those to get back up to speed on this stuff. I figured there would not be a very clean answer since all...
etrasmussen
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
3:31 pm
351
Hello everyone I am working on a web site and I need your input to help me build a section of it. This is not a sales presentation I just need your input as...
Mike Dolbow
mdolbow
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2006
1:22 am
352
Hello everyone I am working on a web site and I need your input to help me build a section of it. This is not a sales presentation I just need your input as...
Mike
mdolbow
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2006
1:26 am
353
Hallo everyone here we working on the treatment of Refrigerator and encounted with the problem material R11(CCl3F), which is used in the insultation foam...
jimi luo
btuluo
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2006
11:19 am
354
I will be out of the office starting 02/06/2006 and will not return until 02/07/2006. If this is urgent you can get a hold of me via cell phone at...
eric_moschet@...
ekmo42
Offline Send Email
Feb 6, 2006
11:10 pm
355
Good morning everyone, I was very happy that IPC finally published a standard for RoHS declarations. Last week I downloaded the files and I am making some test...
Otto de Smit
ottodesmit
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2006
7:53 am
356
Does anyone know if the standard IPC-1752 calls out and standard marking for PCBA's lead free (i.e. in the silk screen). I have seen the Pb with a slash...
Jeff Caldwell
felinfoelus
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2006
8:49 pm
357
Well you can keep dreaming :o). Yes, it's a clear and decisive step in the right direction but it absolutely will not ease the difficulties associated with...
Michael Kirschner
designchain
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2006
9:29 pm
358
Jeff, The IPC standard that defines the standard PCBA marks is IPC-1066. 1752 has nothing to do with marking. See http://www.ipc.org/TOC/IPC-1066.pdf Mike...
Michael Kirschner
designchain
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2006
9:34 pm
359
IPC 1752 is a Materials Declaration standard only; it does not deal at all with labelling. The Pb with slash is part of the recommendations of JEDEC JESD97...
Mark Myles
m3myles
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2006
11:31 pm
360
Thanks guys! Clear now. I appreciate it. Jeff ________________________________ From: RoHS@yahoogroups.com [mailto:RoHS@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark...
Jeff Caldwell
felinfoelus
Offline Send Email
Feb 7, 2006
11:34 pm
361
Jeff, Another interesting point regarding IPC 1752 standard is a legal aspect. Even though there is legal language on the document, it is not valid unless the...
Alan Diamond
aland_ema
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2006
5:21 am
362
Hi Jeff, As far as I know, the EU does not recognize RoHS5 or RoHS6. The reference I know for RoHS 5 or R5 is to the Network Infrastructure Exemption (NIE)....
Alan Diamond
aland_ema
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2006
5:29 am
363
What about RoHS compliant then? Lead free is only part of it would it not be more universal (and accurate) to have a 'RoHS compliant' symbol rather than just...
Peter Smith
peter030371
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2006
7:52 am
364
Hi Michael, Thanks for the clarification. I realy think it is to bad that this declaration (or any type of standard declaration) is accepted so late. I do...
Otto de Smit
ottodesmit
Offline Send Email
Feb 8, 2006
8:31 am
Messages 335 - 364 of 968   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help