Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
SWIEP · Small Wind Information Exchange Program
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Tod reports improved efficiency of the PowerSyncII inverter.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #347 of 395 |

Tod,
   You have inspired me to check my readings again, but it will be a be a couple of months before I get back to that inverter to check again. I will be installing an Ohio Semitronics on the inverter output. Given your data below, I will install another 3-phase Ohio Semitronics on the input. I can sample both at 1 Hz for a few weeks.

   Do you think that will be good enough? If not, what else do you suggest? I will post the results as soon as I have anything new to report.

--Mel

--- In small-wind-home@yahoogroups.com, "Tod Hanley" <thanley@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Mel-
>
> I am not sure where the errors in your efficiency measurements are.  We use
> a Fluke 41b for our measurements of power.
>
> We also have several Fluke 80i-110 current sensors, which are used to
> measure power with a 4 channel Tektronix scope with a power quality
> measurement chip.  Additionally we have 3 Ohio Semitronics power
> transducers.  All of these agree with each other pretty well.  In any case
> the efficiency numbers below are representative of the Powersync II
> inverter.  There is usually not more than a couple percent difference
> between inverter samples.  This one is a good one as usually the maximum
> efficiency is 93%.  The data are at steady state on the dyno.
>
>
> Palt [Wac]
>
> Pout [W]
>
> eff,inv
>
>
> 136
>
> 70
>
> 51%
>
>
> 420
>
> 330
>
> 79%
>
>
> 900
>
> 760
>
> 84%
>
>
> 1620
>
> 1410
>
> 87%
>
>
> 3500
>
> 3100
>
> 89%
>
>
> 4780
>
> 4300
>
> 90%
>
>
> 6600
>
> 6000
>
> 91%
>
>
> 8000
>
> 7300
>
> 91%
>
>
> 10200
>
> 9300
>
> 91%
>
>
> 12400
>
> 11200
>
> 90%
>
>
> 13000
>
> 12000
>
> 92%
>
>
> 13000
>
> 12000
>
> 92%
>
>
> 13000
>
> 12100
>
> 93%
>
>
> 13000
>
> 12100
>
> 93%
>
>
> 13000
>
> 12200
>
> 94%
>
>
> 12900
>
> 12200
>
> 95%
>
>
> 12600
>
> 12000
>
> 95%
>
>

>
> Best
>
>              
>
> Tod Hanley
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Mel Tyree, BA PhD (Cantab.) LLD (h.c.) FRSC
Professor
Department of Renewable Resources
444 Earth Sciences Building
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB, Canada
T6G 2E3
780-492-5597 (Office)
780-902-6771 (Home)
518-594-3815 (Mobile)





Tue Jun 2, 2009 7:42 pm

meltyree1
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #347 of 395 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Tod, You have inspired me to check my readings again, but it will be a be a couple of months before I get back to that inverter to check again. I will be...
Tyree, Mel
meltyree1
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2009
7:42 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help