Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Scipolicy-L · Science and health policy discussion group. For professional practitioners, reseachers, faculty, policy-makers, administrators
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 253 - 282 of 1214   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
253
See Chap. 6, "Nature" of my book "Prometheus Bedeviled: Science and the Contradictions of Contemporary Culture," for a dissection of the cultural, ideological,...
Norman Levitt
njlevitt@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
1:12 pm
254
Newtonian Physics-TRUE, FALSE, OR DOES IT MATTER? If my interpretation is correct, atomic particles in vacuum at opposite ends of a quantum field react...
Stephen Miles Sacks, ...
Editor@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
2:29 pm
255
RE: Allan's subjective qua physical (Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:24 PM) (Stephen -- is this what you had in mind concerning the subject title?) << Response to...
Zaman Frederick L Civ...
Frederick.Zaman@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
2:38 pm
256
... The problems posed by quantum entanglement--famously exemplified by he Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen phenomena, as made even more strinking by Bell--are deep....
Norman Levitt
njlevitt@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
3:57 pm
257
... From: "Loretta Ratkus" <oxfordtrade@...> ... the ... capital. ... includes ... Trade ... Law ... former ... an ... global ... on-site ... at ... in...
Stephen Miles Sacks, ...
Editor@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
4:39 pm
258
Thanks for your very interesting contribution! Angele ... From: "Norman Levitt" <njlevitt@...> To: <Scipolicy-L@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, June 01,...
angele.marietti
angele.marietti@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
4:58 pm
259
... What counts in the end is how the mathematics speaks, not the philosophical, ideological, or social motivations of its inventors. (A similar point could be...
Zaman Frederick L Civ...
Frederick.Zaman@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
5:10 pm
260
Just to interject a very basic point from the peanut gallery; I am given to understand that relatively few of the processes involved in biological systems are...
Jim Eighmey
jeighmey@...
Send Email
Jun 1, 2001
5:22 pm
261
Fred, You write that you do not want "get sidetracked into conventional philosophical discourse". I am really not sure there is such a thing as "conventional"...
Derek Allan
derek_allan@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
3:30 am
262
Fred, Please, let me analyse your reply step by step. My postulate is that before to be able to describe your perception of a perfect non-mechanistic world,...
angele.marietti
angele.marietti@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
6:15 am
263
I welcome Sacks' open-mindedness in seeing the potential policy relevance of alternative interpretations of scientific theories. I could not agree more. My own...
Prof S Fuller
s.w.fuller@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
10:04 am
264
... On the other hand, according to Stuart Clark, author of "Thinking with Demons: the idea of witchcraft in early modern Europe," the Royal Society was big...
Gabriel Stolzenberg
gstolzen@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
3:55 pm
265
In a message dated 6/2/01 6:05:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... So are we all, Steve. So have we been, at least since about 1650. Greetings, PRG [Non-text...
prghome@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
8:53 pm
266
... We've been listening to Fred since 1650? It may seem that way... More seriously, but only slightly, I, for one, have no idea what Steve's sentence means....
Gabriel Stolzenberg
gstolzen@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
9:34 pm
267
I am absolutely thrilled with the debates. I enjoy reading the postings and they surely give me food for thought. So why should we have all the fun? What do...
Stephen Miles Sacks, ...
Editor@...
Send Email
Jun 2, 2001
10:22 pm
268
... Dorothy...
Dorothy Tennov
tennov@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2001
4:58 am
269
Of course, Gabriel is right that many (perhaps most) members of the early Royal Society - certainly Boyle and Newton - pursued the spiritualist implications of...
Prof S Fuller
s.w.fuller@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2001
1:18 pm
270
... [snip] ... Can the question be asked too often: Just how massively consequential was Galileo's combination of vain folly (casting his friend the pope as a...
Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
bradmcc@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2001
5:09 pm
271
It appears that the French, or at least the Parisians, are still a few years ahead of everybody else in sociology of science, or at least ahead stylewize. The...
prghome@...
Send Email
Jun 3, 2001
8:34 pm
272
It seems that some participants in this debate on Newtonian mechanics may be unaware of what it really is about. As it turns out, none of Fuller's criticisms...
Zaman Frederick L Civ...
Frederick.Zaman@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2001
1:16 pm
273
This method of disseminating the debates is a very good idea. I support it 100 percent. ... From: Stephen Miles Sacks, Ph.D. [mailto:Editor@...] ...
Zaman Frederick L Civ...
Frederick.Zaman@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2001
1:17 pm
274
In a message dated 6/4/01 9:18:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... If Zaman wants his comments on "immanent" accelerative forces to be discussed seriously, by the...
prghome@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2001
9:10 pm
275
The constant badgering clearly is coming from Gross (and Levitt). The issues actually are quite simple, but they make every effort to make it appear to be the...
Zaman Frederick L Civ...
Frederick.Zaman@...
Send Email
Jun 4, 2001
10:09 pm
276
Response to Fred Zaman's: "It should be obvious that when biological and social forces always originate within, and interact with the environment through the...
Allan, Derek
Derek.Allan@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
12:09 am
277
Prof S Fuller’s knowledge claim - TRUE, FALSE, OR DOES IT MATTER? On the Subject: Re: [Scipolicy-L] Newtonian Physics-TRUE, FALSE, OR DOES IT MATTER? on...
theotheocharis@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
1:20 am
278
One of the goals of the Scipolicy discussion group is to encourage diverse views and professional criticisms and dialogues. Therein, open communications are...
Stephen Miles Sacks, ...
Editor@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
2:14 am
279
Yes, I am glad this is being mentioned again. Also, it seems that if one is not identifying themselves (or are we suppose to know what PRG stands for?) there...
jemiller
jemisis@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
2:45 am
280
... claims are disguised ideologies. It is also about showing how knowledge claims only have force in certain social settings.>> ... I think Steve could do it...
Gabriel Stolzenberg
gstolzen@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
2:52 am
281
... Dear Paul, Hear, hear! I don't know how "nice" I am, but I am totally befuddled by Zaman's posts whereas yours and most others on this list are always...
Dorothy Tennov
tennov@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
12:15 pm
282
A discussion of the biological and social aspects of immanent forces will come soon enough, in the previously referenced summary on the "Newtonian Physics of...
Zaman Frederick L Civ...
Frederick.Zaman@...
Send Email
Jun 5, 2001
1:10 pm
Messages 253 - 282 of 1214   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help