Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

SocietyforClassicalPhysics · Society for Classical Physics

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 162
  • Category: Physics
  • Founded: Aug 29, 2005
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 1031 - 1060 of 1465   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#1031 From: "Luke" <luthersetzer@...>
Date: Fri Jan 6, 2012 1:06 pm
Subject: Re: Techo Question - please don't post
luthersetzer
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, "Ronald L. Musselman"
<ronald.musselman@...> wrote:

> leave hazardous chemistry to those with the proper
> training and equipment.

I second that remark.

Luke Setzer, PE

#1032 From: "Luke" <luthersetzer@...>
Date: Mon Jan 9, 2012 8:56 pm
Subject: Re: September Paper in European Physics Journal D
luthersetzer
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

What has been the response to this paper publication to date?

Luke Setzer, PE

#1033 From: amack43
Date: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:41 am
Subject: Finishing off pi
amack43
 
While BLP continues to work on the CIHT cell, I thought it might be interesting
to consider whether GUT-CP should get on board with changing the circle constant
pi to tau, not because pi is incorrect but because tau (or 2pi) is better and
more intuitive. The link below gives a reasonable and readable explanation for
ditching pi and since GUT-CP corrects physics, removing the errors of previous
generations, it provides a perfect opportunity for replacing pi once and for all
in the first correct and working GUT.

http://tauday.com/

Of course BLP may consider that adopting such a change on top of everything else
might be having a finger in too many pies...

#1034 From: "novel_compound" <novel_compound@...>
Date: Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:06 am
Subject: Nothing wrong with pi
novel_compound
Send Email Send Email
 
I can't think of a more trivial cause to take up.

Yes, some expressions can be marginally simplified by substituting tau for 2pi; 
but there are also plenty of expressions in which pi appears by itself, which
would be made marginally more complex by the need to substitute tau/2 for pi.

Neither symbol is inherently more elegant, and any effort to re-educate people
and rewrite textbooks would never, ever pay for itself.



--- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, amack43 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> While BLP continues to work on the CIHT cell, I thought it might be
interesting to consider whether GUT-CP should get on board with changing the
circle constant pi to tau, not because pi is incorrect but because tau (or 2pi)
is better and more intuitive. The link below gives a reasonable and readable
explanation for ditching pi and since GUT-CP corrects physics, removing the
errors of previous generations, it provides a perfect opportunity for replacing
pi once and for all in the first correct and working GUT.
>
> http://tauday.com/
>
> Of course BLP may consider that adopting such a change on top of everything
else might be having a finger in too many pies...

#1035 From: amack43
Date: Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:24 am
Subject: Any role of hydrino transitions inside the Earth?
amack43
 
In reading some of BLPs papers I came across the comment that hydrinos have been
detected in commonly ingested salts. Doesn't this imply that hydrino reactions
can and do occur inside the earth itself?

If so, doesn't this raise the possibility that the interior heat of the earth
could be driven, at least in part, by hydrino transitions? The mechanism doesn't
have to be complicated- water and gases (CO2, O2 etc)  are carried down into the
earth via subduction at tectonic plate boundaries where reactions occur between
hydrogen and any number of potential catalysts.

The difference of large amounts of liquid water could also explain why Mars is
cold and geologically dead and Earth is still active.

#1036 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:57 am
Subject: Re: Re: September Paper in European Physics Journal D
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
So far no one has a conventional explanation for the continuum soft X-
ray radiation from hydrogen.  Of course, there is the insistence that
it is not possible according to the Schrödinger equation which this
data actually disproves.  The other argument is that most of the
hydrogen in the universe would have decayed to the hydrino state for
which the correct response is that it has.


On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Luke wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What has been the response to this paper publication to date?
>
> Luke Setzer, PE
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

#1037 From: amack43
Date: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:01 am
Subject: Re: Nothing wrong with pi
amack43
 
My post, as also with the original proponents, was tongue in cheek.  And there
are many examples of where a "worse" product dominates the marketplace with no
overall harm to society. But the points made by the author appear valid to me,
including for educational reasons and the fact that in some formula where pi
appears by itself, it should in fact include a factor of 1/2. Given their
importance a mathematical constant should be chosen because it is the best.
Because of GUT-CP, all physics has to be corrected anyway so it is the best time
to sneak in a correction. But like you I don't think it will happen.

If GUT-CP is widely adopted, the technological breakthroughs will be so rapid
and amazing that I suspect people aren't going to bother with  pi. If the
hyperbolic electron pans out, imagine the race to develop aircraft and
spaceships by every aerospace corporation and military around the world. It
would not be surprising if China, which would prefer to supplant the hegemony of
the US sooner rather than later, would be investigating BLP technology,
especially as the state supports and perhaps sponsors the theft of foreign
confidential corporate intellectual property. With all respect to NASA, chemical
rockets don't cut it in space. Only some form of gravity control is going to be
able to deliver the goods and whoever nails that first is going to plant (by
hand) their flag on Mars. As an Aussie, I'd prefer it was the US.


--- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, "novel_compound"
<novel_compound@...> wrote:
>
> I can't think of a more trivial cause to take up.
>
> Yes, some expressions can be marginally simplified by substituting tau for
2pi;  but there are also plenty of expressions in which pi appears by itself,
which would be made marginally more complex by the need to substitute tau/2 for
pi.
>
> Neither symbol is inherently more elegant, and any effort to re-educate people
and rewrite textbooks would never, ever pay for itself.
>
>
>
> --- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, amack43 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > While BLP continues to work on the CIHT cell, I thought it might be
interesting to consider whether GUT-CP should get on board with changing the
circle constant pi to tau, not because pi is incorrect but because tau (or 2pi)
is better and more intuitive. The link below gives a reasonable and readable
explanation for ditching pi and since GUT-CP corrects physics, removing the
errors of previous generations, it provides a perfect opportunity for replacing
pi once and for all in the first correct and working GUT.
> >
> > http://tauday.com/
> >
> > Of course BLP may consider that adopting such a change on top of everything
else might be having a finger in too many pies...
>

#1038 From: amack43
Date: Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:52 am
Subject: Re: September Paper in European Physics Journal D
amack43
 
In that paper there is reported an anomalous afterglow from pure helium
attributed to contamination by H which is then catalysed by He+.

It is my understanding that He+ being a one electron atom can itself be
catalysed by hydrino catalysts to form, for want of a better word, a helino- it
is just less likely as the positive charge rules out most ion catalysts
(including itself).

In reading up on GUT-CP on helium, the binding energy of the second electron is
actually 13.61eV - however spin pairing between the two electrons lowers the
total energy by another 10.98eV, making the total ionisation energy of He to He+
equal to 24.58750eV and results in a change to the radius where both electrons
become indistinguishable at the same radius.

My question is can Helium exist for any length of time where it has captured two
electrons but they remain unpaired long enough such that 2 neutral unpaired
Helium atoms could act as a energy hole (by providing 2 x 13.61eV) for a He+ ion
so as to collapse the helium ion?



--- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, Randell Mills <RMills@...>
wrote:
>
> So far no one has a conventional explanation for the continuum soft X-
> ray radiation from hydrogen.  Of course, there is the insistence that
> it is not possible according to the Schrödinger equation which this
> data actually disproves.  The other argument is that most of the
> hydrogen in the universe would have decayed to the hydrino state for
> which the correct response is that it has.

#1039 From: "phoo" <phooqu2000@...>
Date: Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:29 pm
Subject: off topic- LIGO results??
phooqu2000
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,
it seems null result is the final result of LIGO (the gravity wave experiment).
this could mean something else, like some string theory membrane transmits
gravity... .  viewed from the viewpoint of the Classical Physics society how
does this grab you?
Does it confirm something else that they weren't looking for? Please help me get
a handle on this...ty.
Phoo.

#1040 From: mixent@...
Date: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:08 am
Subject: Re: off topic- LIGO results??
rvanspaa
Send Email Send Email
 
In reply to  phoo's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:29:55 -0000:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi,
>it seems null result is the final result of LIGO (the gravity wave experiment).
this could mean something else, like some string theory membrane transmits
gravity... .  viewed from the viewpoint of the Classical Physics society how
does this grab you?
>Does it confirm something else that they weren't looking for? Please help me
get a handle on this...ty.
>Phoo.

Actually a null result is what I always expected. It seems to me that even if
gravity waves exist they would warp spacetime as they pass, and consequently the
light used in the detector would be warped too, resulting in no detectable
effect.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

#1041 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:46 am
Subject: Re: off topic- LIGO results??
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
Been busy lately.   Chps. 32 and 34 have the basis of your answer. 

http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/bookdownload.shtml

Matter-energy and spacetime are conserved.  Only matter to energy conversion is capable of causing a change to the curvature of spacetime and the corresponding gravitational field.  Charges can emit photons that superpose to form an electromagnetic wave; whereas, gravitating bodies cannot emit a particle that similarly forms a transverse light-speed wave.  Any oscillation or change in motion of a gravitating body must conserve the relationship between matter-energy and spacetime with a change in time dependent curvature propagating inwards and outwards during the corresponding phase of the period of periodic motion to maintain the conservation.  The time dependent gravitational field fluctuations would only be experienced radially in the near field with no transverse time-dependent gravity wave effect in the far field. 


On Jan 14, 2012, at 6:29 PM, phoo wrote:

Hi,
it seems null result is the final result of LIGO (the gravity wave experiment). this could mean something else, like some string theory membrane transmits gravity... .  viewed from the viewpoint of the Classical Physics society how does this grab you?
Does it confirm something else that they weren't looking for? Please help me get a handle on this...ty.
Phoo.



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:



#1042 From: "opticalphysicist06" <markviverson@...>
Date: Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:03 pm
Subject: Single Atom Transistor
opticalphysi...
Send Email Send Email
 
http://news.yahoo.com/single-atom-transistor-busts-records-181110702.html

Can classical physics predict a single atom transistor?

Kind Regards,

Mark

#1043 From: mixent@...
Date: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:40 am
Subject: Re: Single Atom Transistor
rvanspaa
Send Email Send Email
 
In reply to  opticalphysicist06's message of Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:03:27 -0000:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://news.yahoo.com/single-atom-transistor-busts-records-181110702.html
>
>Can classical physics predict a single atom transistor?
>
>Kind Regards,
>
>Mark

As far as I'm concerned it's not a single atom transistor. It has "metal
contacts" and separate "gates", so saying that the sole phosphorous atom is a
complete transistor is misleading. Furthermore no transistor characteristics
(i.e. graphs) were published that I could see.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

#1044 From: John Barchak <john_e_barchak@...>
Date: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:16 pm
Subject: Re: Single Atom Transistor
john_e_barchak
Send Email Send Email
 
Single Atom Transistor

From: opticalphysicist06 <markviverson@...>
To: SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 6:03 PM
Subject: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] Single Atom Transistor

http://news.yahoo.com/single-atom-transistor-busts-records-181110702.html

Can classical physics predict a single atom transistor?

Kind Regards,

Mark



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SocietyforClassicalPhysics/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    SocietyforClassicalPhysics-digest@yahoogroups.com
    SocietyforClassicalPhysics-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SocietyforClassicalPhysics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




#1045 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Tue Feb 21, 2012 12:39 am
Subject: Re: Single Atom Transistor
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
Yes, via changing the charge state.

On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, opticalphysicist06 wrote:

> http://news.yahoo.com/single-atom-transistor-busts-
> records-181110702.html
>
> Can classical physics predict a single atom transistor?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

#1046 From: Ben Jones <comet_a9@...>
Date: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:01 am
Subject: Orbitsphere Radius / Trapped Photon
comet_a9
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Randy.  I have attached a page which shows that under a first-level analysis the Orbitsphere Radius should actually be proportional to n2 rather than, as GUT_CP eqn. 2.5 says, proportional to n.
But this first-level analysis does not include Relativistic Effects, the Radiation Reaction force, or the Trapped Photon - three concepts you bring in in the section on "DETERMINATION OF ORBITSPHERE RADII".
 
What exactly does the "trapped photon" field look like?  I was thinking it might look like a sinusoidal plane wave which is whirling about in a circle rather than moving along a straight axis of propagation, but I can't find anything in GUT_CP which refers to the "trapped photon" having any oscillatory character at all.
 
-Ben
 

1 of 1 File(s)


#1047 From: MARK IVERSON <markviverson@...>
Date: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:14 pm
Subject: Re: Single Atom Transistor
opticalphysi...
Send Email Send Email
 
Phosphorus ions charge states of -5, -4,-3,-2,-1...1,2,3 exist. Perhaps I missed it, did you calculate the electron configurations for various the charge states of phosphorus?  Does classical physics explain how and when a current density changes the charge state of an ion?   Ideally, a device model should be able to predict base and emitter currents. Changing charge states seems more like a switch than a transistor.





From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
To: "SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com" <SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, February 20, 2012 6:39:01 PM
Subject: Re: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] Single Atom Transistor

 

Yes, via changing the charge state.

On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, opticalphysicist06 wrote:

> http://news.yahoo.com/single-atom-transistor-busts-
> records-181110702.html
>
> Can classical physics predict a single atom transistor?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


#1048 From: John Farrell <jfarrell@...>
Date: Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:29 pm
Subject: Neutrinos faster than light?
john1farrell
Send Email Send Email
 
Do neutrinos have a velocity faster than light?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Time—and a more carefully done experiment—will tell.  



John Farrell


#1049 From: Joe Hyde <josephhyde@...>
Date: Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:13 pm
Subject: Just came across this news item relevant to Milisian
josephhyde
Send Email Send Email
 
Dr. Mills

Just came across this article that would allow a comparison between Milisian and their technique.


Joe

IBM scientists image the charge distribution within a single molecule

February 27, 2012
[+]ibmmolecule2
AFM imaging of naphthalocyanine on an ultrathin layer of natrium chloride on copper. The AFM image was recorded with a CO-terminated tip and reveals the "anatomy" of the molecule. (Credit: IBM Research - Zurich)
This achievement promises to enable fundamental scientific insights into single-molecule switching and bond formation between atoms and molecules for future applications such as solar photoconversion, energy storage, or molecular scale computing devices, says IBM.
They directly imaged the charge distribution within a single naphthalocyanine molecule using a special kind of atomic force microscopy called Kelvin probe force microscopy at low temperatures and in ultrahigh vacuum.
“This work demonstrates an important new capability of being able to directly measure how charge arranges itself within an individual molecule”, states Michael Crommie, Professor for Condensed Matter Physics at the University of Berkeley. “Understanding this kind of charge distribution is critical for understanding how molecules work in different environments. I expect this technique to have an especially important future impact on the many areas where physics, chemistry, and biology intersect.”
In fact, the new technique together with STM and AFM provides complementary information about the molecule, showing different properties of interest. This is reminiscent of medical imaging techniques such as X-ray, MRI, or ultrasonography, which yield complementary information about a person’s anatomy and health condition.
“The technique provides another channel of information that will further our understanding of nanoscale physics. It will now be possible to investigate at the single-molecule level how charge is redistributed when individual chemical bonds are formed between atoms and molecules on surfaces. This is essential as we seek to build atomic and molecular scale devices,” explains Fabian Mohn of the Physics of Nanoscale Systems group at IBM Research- Zurich.
The technique could for example be used to study charge separation and charge transport in “charge-transfer complexes,” which consist of two or more molecules and are subject of intense research activity because they hold great promise for applications such as energy storage or photovoltaics.
[+]ibmmolecule1
Schematic of the measurement principle. At each tip position, the frequency shift is recorded as a function of the sample bias voltage (inset, red circles). The maximum of the fitted parabola (inset, solid black line) yields the KPFM signal V* for that position. (Credit: IBM Research - Zurich)
Taking a closer look
To measure the charge distribution, IBM scientists used an offspring of AFM called Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM).
When a scanning probe tip is placed above a conductive sample, an electric field is generated due to the different electrical potentials of the tip and the sample. With KPFM this potential difference can be measured by applying a voltage such that the electric field is compensated.
KPFM does not measure the electric charge in the molecule directly, but rather the electric field generated by this charge. The field is stronger above areas of the molecule that are charged, leading to a greater KPFM signal. Furthermore, oppositely charged areas yield a different contrast because the direction of the electric field is reversed. This leads to the light and dark areas in the micrograph (or red and blue areas in colored ones).
Naphthalocyanine, a cross-shaped symmetric organic molecule which was also used in IBM’s single-molecule logic switch, was found to be an ideal candidate for this study. It features two hydrogen atoms opposing each other in the center of a molecule measuring only two nanometers in size. The hydrogen atoms can be switched controllably between two different configurations by applying a voltage pulse. This “tautomerization” affects the charge distribution in the molecule, which redistributes itself between opposing legs of the molecules as the hydrogen atoms switch their locations.
Using KPFM, the scientists managed to image the different charge distributions for the two states. To achieve submolecular resolution, a high degree of thermal and mechanical stability and atomic precision of the instrument was required over the course of the experiment, which lasted several days. Moreover, adding just a single carbon monoxide molecule to the apex of the tip enhanced the resolution greatly.
In 2009, the team showed that this modification of the tip allowed them to resolve the “anatomy” — the chemical structures — of molecules with AFM. The present experimental findings were corroborated by first-principle density functional theory calculations done by Fabian Mohn together with Nikolaj Moll of the Computational Sciences group at IBM Research – Zurich.
Pushing the frontiers of nanoscience with scanning probe techniques
“With the emergence of scanning probe microscopy and related techniques in the 1980s, the door to the nanoworld was pushed wide open,” stated the introductory article in the first edition of Nature Nanotechnology in 2006.
The STM and its offspring the AFM are the two workhorses of atomic and molecular scale research. The STM, which was invented by Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer at IBM Research – Zurich in 1981, allowed scientists for the first time to image individual atoms on a surface. The revolutionary microscope, for which the two scientists received the 1986 Nobel Prize in physics, has expanded the boundaries of our knowledge by revealing the properties of surfaces and molecules or atoms adsorbed thereon with atomic resolution.
The STM, however, is not a traditional microscope. Rather than showing a direct image, it uses a very sharp tip — having only a single or a few atoms at its apex — to scan the surface of a material. By bringing the tip very close to the sample surface and applying a bias voltage, a flow of current can be measured between the tip and the sample due to the quantum mechanical effect of electron tunneling. Keeping this tunneling current constant and recording the vertical movement of the tip across the surface makes it possible to study the structure of the surface, atom by atom.

The STM can even be used to manipulate individual atoms and molecules. In 1989, IBM scientist Don Eigler in a famous experiment used his newly developed low-temperature STM to position 35 xenon atoms to spell “IBM”.
In 1985, the AFM was invented by Gerd Binnig. Rather than measuring a tunneling current, the AFM uses a sharp tip attached to a cantilever to measure the tiny forces between the tip and the sample to create an image. 

As the STM and AFM evolved, their capabilities and those of related scanning probe techniques have greatly enhanced the abilities of scientists to explore a wide variety of atomic-scale structures and properties. They offer amazing potential for prototyping complex functional structures and for tailoring and studying their electronic and chemical properties on the atomic scale, which will be essential to create new nanoscale devices and systems that will outperform those that exist today in information technology, medicine, environmental technologies, the energy industry and beyond.
Ref.: F. Mohn, L. Gross, N. Moll, and G. Meyer, Imaging the charge distribution within a single molecule, Nature Nanotechnology, 2012 [DOI 10.1038/NNANO.2012.20]

#1050 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:41 am
Subject: Re: Orbitsphere Radius / Trapped Photon [1 Attachment]
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
The equations of the photons of excited states of H are given in Chp 2.  This section always discusses the flaw with the Bohr quantization condition which is equivalent to that given in your attachment:




On Feb 23, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Ben Jones wrote:

Hi Randy.  I have attached a page which shows that under a first-level analysis the Orbitsphere Radius should actually be proportional to n2 rather than, as GUT_CP eqn. 2.5 says, proportional to n.
But this first-level analysis does not include Relativistic Effects, the Radiation Reaction force, or the Trapped Photon - three concepts you bring in in the section on "DETERMINATION OF ORBITSPHERE RADII".
 
What exactly does the "trapped photon" field look like?  I was thinking it might look like a sinusoidal plane wave which is whirling about in a circle rather than moving along a straight axis of propagation, but I can't find anything in GUT_CP which refers to the "trapped photon" having any oscillatory character at all.
 
-Ben
 


#1051 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:41 am
Subject: Re: Just came across this news item relevant to Milisian
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
Looks similar to the case of the AFM image of pentacene shown with classical overlay at Figure 15.38 on p. 901 of Chp. 15:

http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/bookdownload.shtml



On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Joe Hyde wrote:

Dr. Mills

Just came across this article that would allow a comparison between Milisian and their technique.


Joe

IBM scientists image the charge distribution within a single molecule

February 27, 2012
[+]ibmmolecule2
AFM imaging of naphthalocyanine on an ultrathin layer of natrium chloride on copper. The AFM image was recorded with a CO-terminated tip and reveals the "anatomy" of the molecule. (Credit: IBM Research - Zurich)
This achievement promises to enable fundamental scientific insights into single-molecule switching and bond formation between atoms and molecules for future applications such as solar photoconversion, energy storage, or molecular scale computing devices, says IBM.
They directly imaged the charge distribution within a single naphthalocyanine molecule using a special kind of atomic force microscopy called Kelvin probe force microscopy at low temperatures and in ultrahigh vacuum.
“This work demonstrates an important new capability of being able to directly measure how charge arranges itself within an individual molecule”, states Michael Crommie, Professor for Condensed Matter Physics at the University of Berkeley. “Understanding this kind of charge distribution is critical for understanding how molecules work in different environments. I expect this technique to have an especially important future impact on the many areas where physics, chemistry, and biology intersect.”
In fact, the new technique together with STM and AFM provides complementary information about the molecule, showing different properties of interest. This is reminiscent of medical imaging techniques such as X-ray, MRI, or ultrasonography, which yield complementary information about a person’s anatomy and health condition.
“The technique provides another channel of information that will further our understanding of nanoscale physics. It will now be possible to investigate at the single-molecule level how charge is redistributed when individual chemical bonds are formed between atoms and molecules on surfaces. This is essential as we seek to build atomic and molecular scale devices,” explains Fabian Mohn of the Physics of Nanoscale Systems group at IBM Research- Zurich.
The technique could for example be used to study charge separation and charge transport in “charge-transfer complexes,” which consist of two or more molecules and are subject of intense research activity because they hold great promise for applications such as energy storage or photovoltaics.
[+]ibmmolecule1
Schematic of the measurement principle. At each tip position, the frequency shift is recorded as a function of the sample bias voltage (inset, red circles). The maximum of the fitted parabola (inset, solid black line) yields the KPFM signal V* for that position. (Credit: IBM Research - Zurich)
Taking a closer look
To measure the charge distribution, IBM scientists used an offspring of AFM called Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM).
When a scanning probe tip is placed above a conductive sample, an electric field is generated due to the different electrical potentials of the tip and the sample. With KPFM this potential difference can be measured by applying a voltage such that the electric field is compensated.
KPFM does not measure the electric charge in the molecule directly, but rather the electric field generated by this charge. The field is stronger above areas of the molecule that are charged, leading to a greater KPFM signal. Furthermore, oppositely charged areas yield a different contrast because the direction of the electric field is reversed. This leads to the light and dark areas in the micrograph (or red and blue areas in colored ones).
Naphthalocyanine, a cross-shaped symmetric organic molecule which was also used in IBM’s single-molecule logic switch, was found to be an ideal candidate for this study. It features two hydrogen atoms opposing each other in the center of a molecule measuring only two nanometers in size. The hydrogen atoms can be switched controllably between two different configurations by applying a voltage pulse. This “tautomerization” affects the charge distribution in the molecule, which redistributes itself between opposing legs of the molecules as the hydrogen atoms switch their locations.
Using KPFM, the scientists managed to image the different charge distributions for the two states. To achieve submolecular resolution, a high degree of thermal and mechanical stability and atomic precision of the instrument was required over the course of the experiment, which lasted several days. Moreover, adding just a single carbon monoxide molecule to the apex of the tip enhanced the resolution greatly.
In 2009, the team showed that this modification of the tip allowed them to resolve the “anatomy” — the chemical structures — of molecules with AFM. The present experimental findings were corroborated by first-principle density functional theory calculations done by Fabian Mohn together with Nikolaj Moll of the Computational Sciences group at IBM Research – Zurich.
Pushing the frontiers of nanoscience with scanning probe techniques
“With the emergence of scanning probe microscopy and related techniques in the 1980s, the door to the nanoworld was pushed wide open,” stated the introductory article in the first edition of Nature Nanotechnology in 2006.
The STM and its offspring the AFM are the two workhorses of atomic and molecular scale research. The STM, which was invented by Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer at IBM Research – Zurich in 1981, allowed scientists for the first time to image individual atoms on a surface. The revolutionary microscope, for which the two scientists received the 1986 Nobel Prize in physics, has expanded the boundaries of our knowledge by revealing the properties of surfaces and molecules or atoms adsorbed thereon with atomic resolution.
The STM, however, is not a traditional microscope. Rather than showing a direct image, it uses a very sharp tip — having only a single or a few atoms at its apex — to scan the surface of a material. By bringing the tip very close to the sample surface and applying a bias voltage, a flow of current can be measured between the tip and the sample due to the quantum mechanical effect of electron tunneling. Keeping this tunneling current constant and recording the vertical movement of the tip across the surface makes it possible to study the structure of the surface, atom by atom.

The STM can even be used to manipulate individual atoms and molecules. In 1989, IBM scientist Don Eigler in a famous experiment used his newly developed low-temperature STM to position 35 xenon atoms to spell “IBM”.
In 1985, the AFM was invented by Gerd Binnig. Rather than measuring a tunneling current, the AFM uses a sharp tip attached to a cantilever to measure the tiny forces between the tip and the sample to create an image. 

As the STM and AFM evolved, their capabilities and those of related scanning probe techniques have greatly enhanced the abilities of scientists to explore a wide variety of atomic-scale structures and properties. They offer amazing potential for prototyping complex functional structures and for tailoring and studying their electronic and chemical properties on the atomic scale, which will be essential to create new nanoscale devices and systems that will outperform those that exist today in information technology, medicine, environmental technologies, the energy industry and beyond.
Ref.: F. Mohn, L. Gross, N. Moll, and G. Meyer, Imaging the charge distribution within a single molecule, Nature Nanotechnology, 2012 [DOI 10.1038/NNANO.2012.20]


#1052 From: amack43
Date: Sat Mar 3, 2012 2:07 am
Subject: Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation
amack43
 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120302101413.htm

"ScienceDaily (Mar. 2, 2012) — Astronomers using data from NASA's Hubble
Telescope have observed what appears to be a clump of dark matter left behind
from a wreck between massive clusters of galaxies. The result could challenge
current theories about dark matter that predict galaxies should be anchored to
the invisible substance even during the shock of a collision."

#1053 From: amack43
Date: Sat Mar 3, 2012 2:38 am
Subject: New Model Provides Different Take On Planetary Accretion
amack43
 
This is interesting because it articulates the flaws in the previous accepted
theory about planet formation that once you think about it, couldn't possibly be
right

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120229091955.htm

"Using classical physics, the laws of thermodynamics and mechanics, Hofmeister,
with assistance from Criss, presents an accretion model that assumes a
three-dimensional (3-D) gas cloud. This pre-solar nebula collapses and forms the
Sun and planets at essentially the same time, with the planets contracting
toward the Sun."

#1054 From: "pius.zaleski" <pius.zaleski@...>
Date: Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:09 am
Subject: Fifth Force - Hyperbolic Electron
pius.zaleski
Send Email Send Email
 
Is it a correct statement to say that a hyperbolic electron can only be produced
from a free electron or conversely that no bound electron can be hyperbolic?

#1055 From: amack43
Date: Mon Mar 5, 2012 11:02 pm
Subject: Re: Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation
amack43
 
Thought I'd add a bit more as to why this may be important.

Usually when some blogger hears of GUT-CP their first response is simply to
defame BLP and mouth off about how QM is the best theory ever and never been
proved wrong in a million million experiments. It's quite clear that most never
bother to actually read GUT-CP or even understand what they're talking about.
Because they know the majority backs them, they don't need reason or fairness or
even experimental evidence to understand what GUT-CP says before they attack it.
And its hard to argue with a theory whose followers demand that all results must
be interpreted as supporting QM or they must be either ignored or attacked.

Occasionally they do perform a service by giving a reason as to why they think
CP is wrong. This is valuable to me because it enables me to understand if their
position is reasonable and to test BLP's claims that the theory correctly models
the universe.

Some years ago when it was mentioned that hydrinos may be the missing dark
matter, one physicist trashed the idea asserting that dark matter passes
unhindered through itself and normal matter and thus hydrinos being lower energy
hydrogen could not be dark matter. I was never sure where that claim can from
because no-one else has claimed to know what dark matter is, has seen it, made
it or detected it other than by its gravitational effects- other than Dr. Mills
of course who predicts that hydrinos are the most likely candidate for dark
matter particles.

Clearly the source for the detractor's claim must have been astrophysical data
from galaxy cluster collisions which had been interpreted as showing that dark
matter simply passed through the collision and kept pace with the galaxies,
leaving behind only hot gas slowed down by collisions as the galaxies collided
and moved on.

The new finding puts the nix on that idea. Along with the slower hot gas forming
the debris of the cluster collision, was a large amount of dark matter detected
by gravitational lensing. It does therefore not pass through unhindered during a
collision and forms part of the debris showing it does react like normal matter.
It could perhaps also be argued that the slower colliding gas has been
transformed over time into hydrinos but that also supports CP and resonant
hydrogen transitions as the origin of dark matter in any case.

antony

--- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, amack43 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120302101413.htm
>
> "ScienceDaily (Mar. 2, 2012) — Astronomers using data from NASA's Hubble
Telescope have observed what appears to be a clump of dark matter left behind
from a wreck between massive clusters of galaxies. The result could challenge
current theories about dark matter that predict galaxies should be anchored to
the invisible substance even during the shock of a collision."
>

#1056 From: "pius.zaleski" <pius.zaleski@...>
Date: Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:03 am
Subject: GUT-CP Standard Model
pius.zaleski
Send Email Send Email
 
What would a new Standard Model (of fundamental particles) for the GUT-CP look
like? I'd really love to see this as a poster.

#1057 From: "Hum" <mhuemoeller@...>
Date: Tue Mar 6, 2012 6:58 pm
Subject: Quarterly Update
mhuemoeller
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Dr. Mills, I was wondering if you could give us a quick status report.  It
has been about 3 months since you last told us you would be announcing as soon
as you had some other write-ups/patents take place.  Where are you on that and
do you expect to put out news this quarter.

Thanks
Mark

#1058 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Wed Mar 7, 2012 12:45 am
Subject: Re: Quarterly Update
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
We are on schedule for development and validation.  We have been
selectively releasing results under CDAs, but a public release
timeline hasn't been finalized yet.


On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Hum wrote:

> Hi Dr. Mills, I was wondering if you could give us a quick status
> report.  It has been about 3 months since you last told us you
> would be announcing as soon as you had some other write-ups/patents
> take place.  Where are you on that and do you expect to put out
> news this quarter.
>
> Thanks
> Mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

#1059 From: Randell Mills <RMills@...>
Date: Wed Mar 7, 2012 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation
drrandellmills
Send Email Send Email
 
The good news for mankind is that H2O can be converted into hydrino
(dark matter), oxygen, and electricity.  Oil is on the road to
obsolescence.

On Mar 5, 2012, at 6:02 PM, amack43 wrote:

> Thought I'd add a bit more as to why this may be important.
>
> Usually when some blogger hears of GUT-CP their first response is
> simply to defame BLP and mouth off about how QM is the best theory
> ever and never been proved wrong in a million million experiments.
> It's quite clear that most never bother to actually read GUT-CP or
> even understand what they're talking about. Because they know the
> majority backs them, they don't need reason or fairness or even
> experimental evidence to understand what GUT-CP says before they
> attack it. And its hard to argue with a theory whose followers
> demand that all results must be interpreted as supporting QM or
> they must be either ignored or attacked.
>
> Occasionally they do perform a service by giving a reason as to why
> they think CP is wrong. This is valuable to me because it enables
> me to understand if their position is reasonable and to test BLP's
> claims that the theory correctly models the universe.
>
> Some years ago when it was mentioned that hydrinos may be the
> missing dark matter, one physicist trashed the idea asserting that
> dark matter passes unhindered through itself and normal matter and
> thus hydrinos being lower energy hydrogen could not be dark matter.
> I was never sure where that claim can from because no-one else has
> claimed to know what dark matter is, has seen it, made it or
> detected it other than by its gravitational effects- other than Dr.
> Mills of course who predicts that hydrinos are the most likely
> candidate for dark matter particles.
>
> Clearly the source for the detractor's claim must have been
> astrophysical data from galaxy cluster collisions which had been
> interpreted as showing that dark matter simply passed through the
> collision and kept pace with the galaxies, leaving behind only hot
> gas slowed down by collisions as the galaxies collided and moved on.
>
> The new finding puts the nix on that idea. Along with the slower
> hot gas forming the debris of the cluster collision, was a large
> amount of dark matter detected by gravitational lensing. It does
> therefore not pass through unhindered during a collision and forms
> part of the debris showing it does react like normal matter. It
> could perhaps also be argued that the slower colliding gas has been
> transformed over time into hydrinos but that also supports CP and
> resonant hydrogen transitions as the origin of dark matter in any
> case.
>
> antony
>
> --- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, amack43
> <no_reply@...> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120302101413.htm
>>
>> "ScienceDaily (Mar. 2, 2012) — Astronomers using data from NASA's
>> Hubble Telescope have observed what appears to be a clump of dark
>> matter left behind from a wreck between massive clusters of
>> galaxies. The result could challenge current theories about dark
>> matter that predict galaxies should be anchored to the invisible
>> substance even during the shock of a collision."
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

#1060 From: amack43
Date: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:24 am
Subject: Re: Dark Matter Core Defies Explanation
amack43
 
Can't wait to see the specs for the CIHT but can appreciate that BLP must secure
its IP first. I am still amazed that a CIHT fuel cell could use hydrino
transitions so effectively to drive charge separation without high temperatures.
I just hope it can be finalised and demonstrated before Sep 2013 at which point
I stand to collect a crate of fine Australian wine off a skeptical friend.

I was wondering also about conversion of hydrinos to energy. Given that creation
and storage of antimatter is almost impossible to achieve in usable amounts, I
note from GUT-CP that extremely collapsed hydrinos can capture an electron
anti-neutrinocan and convert to gamma rays. Why wouldn't this process be the
ideal fuel for long distance space travel- total conversion of mass to energy
without the cost and confinement of antimatter?


--- In SocietyforClassicalPhysics@yahoogroups.com, Randell Mills <RMills@...>
wrote:
>
> The good news for mankind is that H2O can be converted into hydrino
> (dark matter), oxygen, and electricity.  Oil is on the road to
> obsolescence.

Messages 1031 - 1060 of 1465   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help