The book (The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics posted at http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/bookdownload.shtml) has undergone...
4
John Farrell
john1farrell
Oct 12, 2005 7:01 pm
Fellow members of the Society of Classical Quantum Mechanics, I first heard the term ³quantum mechanics² as a college senior (chemistry major; 1959). I took...
5
stbrewer1
Oct 14, 2005 8:11 pm
I am new member --- shelby brewer. email address is stbrewer@......
6
John Farrell
john1farrell
Oct 27, 2005 3:08 am
October 20, 2005 All parties interested in CQM: The ŒResponse¹ below was sent to NJP on June 22, 2005. On August 11 (almost two months later) the journal...
7
John Farrell
john1farrell
Oct 27, 2005 9:32 pm
Does anyone (including Jonathon) have a suggestion on how we can urge the editor of NJP to do the right thing? John Farrell...
8
John Farrell
john1farrell
Oct 29, 2005 6:43 pm
OK. How about this for a suggestion. Each of us (those who want to) write a letter (or email) to the editor of NJP expressing (1) our dismay (outrage?) of the...
9
P.J van Noorden
vannoorden1
Oct 31, 2005 3:48 pm
Hello, My name is Peter van Noorden ( private mail pjvannrd@...) On September 28th and Oktober 3rd I send 2 emails to Tim Smith to make clear that Rathke...
10
dr_frank_camp
Nov 2, 2005 6:49 pm
Below is the text from the BBC Focus article. I suggest that we all purchase a copy. Frank Author] Robert Matthews Strap] Physics Head] Hydrino theory : hype...
11
Dr. Randell L. Mills
drrandellmills
Nov 2, 2005 7:48 pm
This is the Response I received from NJP for my careful and scientific rebuttal of the article by Rathke: ...
12
Tstolper@...
tstolper1
Nov 3, 2005 1:47 am
In message 8, John Farrell suggested that we all write or email the editor of NEW J. PHYS. to express dismay over the handling of the Phillips/Rathke/Mills ...
13
John Farrell
john1farrell
Nov 7, 2005 2:41 am
SCQM Members, You might want to check out the article on Mills at: <http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,1627657,00.html> John Farrell...
14
Peter Gluck
peter193710
Nov 9, 2005 2:13 pm
Dear Friends, I am happy to join this group focused on Randy's ideas and technology. My favorite activity is scale-up and industrial apllications and all I...
15
riffcon95
Nov 9, 2005 2:14 pm
My name is Edward R. Riffle and I am interested in new energy sources. I have worked for major energy companies in new technology development and have been...
16
John A. Kassebaum
john_kassebaum
Nov 9, 2005 10:18 pm
I see that others are properly introducing themselves, so I thought I would follow suit. I was invited to join by Dr. John Farrell, and I have been a longtime ...
17
Tstolper@...
tstolper1
Nov 10, 2005 9:29 pm
John Farrell encouraged me last week to speak candidly (thank you, John), so here goes: First of all, members of the SCQM should be aware that I intend to ...
18
Craig Watson
ccwatson73
Nov 11, 2005 2:54 am
Hello, I am encouraged to see the take up of the open atmosphere that John is trying to engender in this group and in that spirit I'd like to lay my cards on...
19
allisterfurey
Nov 11, 2005 1:45 pm
Greetings to the group I have joined as I may well be forced to refer to the undoubtedly superior understanding of CQM within the group in my quest to fully ...
20
riffcon95
Nov 11, 2005 7:21 pm
to the scqm group there is no doubt that cqm is more elegant and more predictive than qm. that is what all the work published on blp's web site shows. the ...
21
John Farrell
john1farrell
Nov 11, 2005 8:31 pm
I agree with almost everything stated by Tom Stolper--particularly the suggestion that Mills' response must be less than six pages. [As an aside, I generally...
22
nxnbid
Nov 12, 2005 12:14 am
I came across CQM about a week ago and I'm astounded by the elegance, breadth and depth of the theory after reading everything I could find including all 37...
23
Dr. Randell L. Mills
drrandellmills
Nov 12, 2005 12:35 am
The November '05 Edition of The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Quantum Mechanics is posted: http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/bookdownload.shtml We can...
24
Tstolper@...
tstolper1
Nov 12, 2005 2:43 am
Re message 21 by John Farrell: John, I suggested in message 17 that Jonathan Phillips withdraw his response to Rathke in favor of a new response by Mills for...
25
John Farrell
john1farrell
Nov 12, 2005 3:22 am
Re message 24 by Tom Stolper I agree that NJP will, in all likelihood, publish one response. My point is that it would be advantageous if they **received**...
26
john_e_barchak
Nov 12, 2005 3:01 pm
Hello SCQM I am an EE mainly involved in signal processing, communications, and security. My motivation for being here is my desire for a rational physics....
27
Tstolper@...
tstolper1
Nov 12, 2005 7:47 pm
Re John Farrell's message 25: You could be right, John. I guess my point in message 24 was that since NEW J. PHYS. is under some obligation to print at least...
28
ccwatson73
Nov 13, 2005 7:30 pm
Hi, In reviewing the raison d'être for his group: "Society for Classical Quantum Mechanics was established by a group of scientists to discuss and advance the...
29
John Farrell
john1farrell
Nov 14, 2005 7:23 pm
... There is no reason why we cannot do both. Mills has made two contributions--both about the new edition of the GUTCQM. He has agreed to (occasionally)...
30
John Farrell
john1farrell
Nov 14, 2005 7:34 pm
... From: "Dr. Randell L. Mills" <rmills@...> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:03:31 -0500 To: <SCQM-owner@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [SCQM] Hello ...
31
Shelby Brewer
stbrewer1
Nov 15, 2005 1:55 am
I think Randy has already provided several smoking guns: 1. tons of gamma spectroscopy 2. NMR on hyd gas 3. NMR on process residuals 4. the multielectron...
32
Mike Carrell
phighsigh
Nov 15, 2005 1:57 am
I see some familiar names here and am happy to have a link to John Farrell, with whom I've had a number of fruitful conversations. For others, I will introduce...
