Recent measurements at Harvard are reported in Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 this year. Gabrielse and colleagues obtain g/2 = 1.00115965218085(76) which is about 6...
332
Jonathan Phillips
jphillips@...
Sep 26, 2006 3:35 am
John; I'd like to share the following message with the group members: The members of SCQM may find the manuscript entitled, Increasing Exclusion: The Pauli...
Dr. Phillips, I read your paper and was wondering why you compute the ionization energy for the two electron atom differently than Dr. Mills. For example, you...
334
Jonathan Phillips
jphillips@...
Sep 29, 2006 7:35 pm
... I don't include his magnetic energy correction, although it's under consideration. However, it could be argued that the calculations I employ are more...
I always was bothered by the fact that in QM one solves an exact equation, Shrodinger's equation, and then gets an exact function, the wave function, but then...
Can classical quantum mechanics go beyond n=20 to explain the entire periodic table? Perhaps Molegos is considering -d and f shell electron configurations for...
... What you're having trouble with is the way a particle can also 'manifest' as a wave. Everybody goes through this. The resolution lies in grasping that your...
Hi Rob, The principal reason behind Heisenberg's observation, that, along with a number of other effects has come to be known as the HUP, is startling simple...
Phillip, Thanks but I don't follow your argument at all. I do not understand your terminology such as linearity of the frame of reference- how can space and...
Hugh, Thanks for the response but no, I do not think I am confused by the wave nature of matter. The HUP is not simply the wave nature of matter. As I...
Philip,I like the way you think. Since all QM is based on linear approximations (and much of it appears to be based on photon interactions - which are...
This is true. The "higher order" quantization you speak of is called Weyl quantization and has been around since the late 1920s. -Will ... approximations (and...
My entire post is detailing standard, non-relativistic quantum mechanics. I apologize for the length, but a rather detailed question was asked, and I'm trying...
Drew, I'm glad you understand how such a basic problem arises in SQM. You're exactly right I believe that the non-linearities come about due to relativistic...
Drew and Phillip, The statements below makes absolutly no sense to me. How do they relate to the failure of SQM in the light of CQM? How do they relate to my...
... No, the actual physics is simple and exact but the mathematical solutions may involve the non linear terms and complexity. For example, in Boundary Value...
The following print-on-demand book is now available from Amazon.com Genius Inventor: The controversy about the work of Randell Mills, America's Newton, in...
Lee Smolin's The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next (Hardcover) is available both new and used...
349
Jonathan Phillips
jphillips@...
Nov 6, 2006 8:54 pm
The trouble with physics is that it went off the rails with quantum theory. Backing up from String Theory is just the beginning. The community has to back up...
In John Barchak's SCQM message 348, he quoted from the beginning of Lee Smolin's recent book, THE TROUBLE WITH PHYSICS. Very interesting, John, thanks. Where...
... Lee Smolin's recent book, THE TROUBLE WITH PHYSICS. ... quote ... far ... because most physicists and science writers would like to think that there isn't...
Dr. Phillips, I read your paper and the following sentence struck me: "the following is postulated about the orbitsphere. Its a physical object shaped like a...
Largely because of the problems like the one I raised, I find myself incapable of following or working with any CQM calculations. I have asked for help on...
David Gross is director of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at University of California, Santa Barbara. On the November 7, 2006 edition of "All...
Hi Will Why do you deviate from Dr. Mills' description of the OS and then ask why it does not make sense? Best - John B. ... myself ... have ... either:a. ... ...
Where did I deviate from the proper description? I lifted a sentence from Dr. Phillips paper verbatim, as it was the most concise explanation I could find. I...
I'm sorry, I said solid when I perhaps should have said uniform and continuous? The same holds, and I believe that a soap bubble is certainly uniform and...
