Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Stellarvue · For owners of fine Stellarvue telescopes
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 47258 - 47287 of 103672   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
47258
... Yes, there does seem to be a disturbing pattern of over-statement of eye relief in many eyepieces. The British Magazine "Sky at Night"( November 2005) has...
gblt
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
9:13 am
47259
Somehow I am not surprised at this eye relief discrepancy. After all we have refractors being sold with focusers that vignette the aperture to less than...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
10:10 am
47260
Glad to help Preston. Good luck on the article! David E...
p david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
10:44 am
47261
You are correct Darren. Sue's comment was that she could see more filamentary detail in the 115. IMHO I think it relates to the finer optics and better...
caguynn@...
chrisg3425
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
12:10 pm
47262
Hi Darren, Feeling really bad about you not getting any clears skies up there. Well, it's the holiday season and all, so I thought I would give you one of my ...
p david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
12:47 pm
47263
Harry, that must be a missprint. The chrome barrel on my Meade SWA 28mm eyepiece is just a hair under 50mm o.d. For a 49mm field stop, the chrome barrel would...
p david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
12:55 pm
47264
Hmm, then it seems like a 40-42mm widefield eyepiece is false advertising in a way. From the formulas I can't see any reasonable focal length where the field ...
Harry Pulley
hpulley4
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
1:25 pm
47265
... Jeff, thanks for the post. I have stated that resolution on dim dso's is "not as important" and I need to clarify my position on that further. When most...
p david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
1:51 pm
47266
... Harry, this is why, in 1-1/4" format, I tell people to get the 32mm plossl, but not the 40mm plossl. They both have the exact same field stop diameter...
david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
2:09 pm
47267
Good point Darren! Today's CCD and CMOS chips are enhanced to daylight spectrum (viewing), whereby the predominant color bayer matrix (pixel) is green or...
Stuart
unleaded55
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
2:15 pm
47268
Gee David, Gosh nice of you to help our SVer's who are sky challenged! (I am in the same boat now, as the Midwest is cloudy.) Your reports are impressive. ...
Stuart
unleaded55
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
2:17 pm
47269
Well, the field stop cutoff is not total so you can get some field illumination beyond it so a 40mm eyepiece does give you a bit more than a 35mm but not much...
Harry Pulley
hpulley4
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
2:58 pm
47270
... Was that you out there? I was trying for Mars also with the Radian (5mm) with little luck... GLB...
gblt
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
3:36 pm
47271
An editor of Popular Photography and Imaging found this problem with digital cameras about a year ago. When you get camera chips with ever increasing file...
p david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
3:56 pm
47272
Well, the "problem" must have been with Mars that night then. Last night (Nov 30th) I was able to get such good detail at 200x I decided not to use a filter!...
p david elosser
asterhunter
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
4:06 pm
47273
Bob: What you posted is a pretty good assessment but I always jump in here to address the quality concerns I have based on comparitive testing. The fact that...
stellarvue1
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
4:49 pm
47274
Yes I think you guys make a good point. But GLB (by the way what is your name as I feel funny addressing you by initials) I still would like to know what is...
stellarvue1
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
4:57 pm
47275
David - Thanks for the clarification and I agree 100%. Jeff ... Jeff, thanks for the post. I have stated that resolution on dim dso's is "not as important" and...
Jeff Moshier
jeffreyduvall
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
5:33 pm
47276
David E & Harry; Claimed field stop size can be larger than the barrel interior but there has to be edge vignetting, noticed visually or not. Both the Orion...
Rich Wood
astronut1001
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
6:12 pm
47277
OK, it looks like I've learned about handling the green filter now: http://www.flickr.com/photos/79653922@N00/69040022/ Plus, the longer exposure overall shows...
Taylor J. Barton
chipdatajeffb
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
7:07 pm
47278
Vic, Nice clarification of the achro/apo issues. In following the thread on Apo vs Achro I got the impression that people maybe really were saying that apos...
paleosonic
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
7:26 pm
47279
Jeff, This looks very nice! An excellent improvement! Great work! The cloud and filaments make a great contrast! I suspect there might be a bit more in the...
Matt Thomas
matt_e_thomas
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
7:41 pm
47280
Jeff, Beautiful image! The color on the filaments looks real nice. Great contrast with the cloud. Thanks for sharing. That SV 152 looks like a great AP...
davew05@...
dweixelman
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
8:05 pm
47281
... Thanks, Matt! The frost came much later, after I'd moved way over to M51 to try it. About midway through the first of that sequence I noticed noise in the...
Taylor J. Barton
chipdatajeffb
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
8:57 pm
47282
What is an XC filter. If it eliminates the problem, I'd like one. On a different topic, I saw an image taken with a digital rebel through a WO 80mm Semi APO,...
Steven Orlando
steveastrophoto
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
9:30 pm
47283
Thanks for the pics! Chris ... cover. ... for...
Chris Cook
ccook0101
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
9:39 pm
47284
JB, Excellent image! The iterations of L to RGB ratios seem to have worked out well. I have seen other ratios as L=1.5 R=2.0 B=1.8 G=1.8 and then compensating...
Stuart
unleaded55
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
9:39 pm
47285
... Ah, that would be the, ahem, most excellent triplet doing that ... ;^) Thanks, Stuart! I will try those ratios, too, next time out. jb...
Taylor J. Barton
chipdatajeffb
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
10:05 pm
47286
In a message dated 12/1/2005 08:59:47 Pacific Standard Time, vic@... writes: Two specifications should probably be made, measured eye relief and ...
k75jim@...
k75jim
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
11:31 pm
47287
Okay. All this discussion about the difference between 3 and 4 inch views. (see above) I'm drawn to the 102BV scope. I like the idea of a 4" doublet because my...
jakethe47
Offline Send Email
Dec 1, 2005
11:34 pm
Messages 47258 - 47287 of 103672   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help