Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
TYR · The YOURDON Report Discussion Group
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 38361 - 38390 of 39551   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#38390 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:51 am
Subject: Near death, aided by ghostly companion
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Very interesting. On this topic, I'm reading a relevant book I recommend:
http://www.amazon.com/Life-After-Death-Dinesh-DSouza/dp/1596980990

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38389 From: "Ken Garen" <kengaren@...>
Date: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:51 am
Subject: You Just Can't Fix Stupid!!
kengaren
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Gotta go all the way through this sequence to appreciate it...


 

 

You Just Can’t Fix Stupid!! 



I could have sworn I hit the brake pedal!
 
Car upside down in the bay - see guy standing on
 it? 
Call out the wrecker!? 


Coming back up...coming...coming...
 




?Coming...almost there! 
? 


Ooops! 
?


I could have sworn I set the brakes on that truck! 
Time to get a Bigger Wrecker! 



?

Ok, we got the car..let's get the other wrecker now!? 



Ooohhh Crap !!!!
 
Who's gonna explain this one to the insurance guys? 

SEE...your day has not been so bad after all...

 


#38388 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:39 am
Subject: Emails Discovered from Major Muslim Nidal Hassan to Al Qaeda UPDATE: OBAMA W...
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Atlas Shrugs by Pamela Geller on 11/9/09

A key Republican lawmaker on Monday asked that the Obama administration keep documents relevant to the Fort Hood shooting available so Congress can continue its investigation into what he called an incident of "homegrown jihadism."

Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich), the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, sent a preservation order to the heads of the FBI, CIA, NSA and Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair directing them to keep the documents as part of his committee's review of the attacks that killed 13 and wounded 30.

In a release, Hoekstra accused the administration of dragging its feet in releasing items pertaining to the attacks that could prove the perpetrator, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, had ties to terrorists.

Is Obama still doing jumpshots but not jumping to conclusions?

Hasan Tried to Contact Al Qaeda

U.S. intelligence agencies learned months ago that Army Major Nidal Hasan was trying to make contacts with Al Qaeda, two sources tell ABC News. It is unknown if these agencies informed the Army. Hasan also attended a mosque run by a radical imam named Anwar al Awlaki in Falls Church, Virginia at the same time as two of the 9/11 hijackers, though it is unknown if there was ever any contact between them. Now living in Yemen, Awlaki blogged on Monday, “Nidal Hassan Did the Right Thing.”



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38387 From: "EKG" <juliangoh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 11:19 pm
Subject: News and magazine portal to access Re: Space Economy and Science
juliangoh@...
Send Email Send Email
 
This is a news and magazine portal (www.thepaperboy.com) that contains several thousands 'left right online medias' from 200 more countries. I found it useful to manage a vast information flow by using Google Reader, its an effective time management tool.
 
吳人, EKG
 
關於ekg の故事 about ekg: www.aboutekg.wordpress.com
 
用文字表達思想, 用行動表達文字  Written expression of thought, written driven by actions

From: Al
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 10:17 PM
Subject: RE: Space Economy and Science

Your statements are pure speculation.  America’s true goals are not well articulated to the people because of threats that are not well articulated in a climate of secrecy regarding military intelligence data when the nation is at war on several fronts.

 

There is the warfare with the people who drew attention to themselves in 9-11, during the Bush administration.  They had actually declared war on USA years earlier, but US had not given them the attention they are now getting.

 

Similarly, during the Bush administration, there was something now called an “Electronic Pearl Harbor”, which I believe is still going on, where national security stuff is an open book to all sorts of adversaries, and apparently this is a two way street.

 

The news media inside USA is US-centric view point, not doing good job of portraying advances in other nations whose activities do not yet impinge on US policies.  I don’t know if other media in other nations have similar THEM-centric views.  Anyhow, of approx 200 nations in the world, most all of them are engaged in work with WMD and missile and other delivery systems.  Participating in space programs is excellent cover for missile delivery systems.

 

-

Al Mac

"It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit." Harry S. Truman

 

Happy I remain this functional: Wake up each morning; roll out of bed; feet touch floor; I can stand up (sometimes need to push with arms); walk; get to toilet; all familiar systems do their thing. 


From: EKG [mailto:juliangoh@...]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 6:58 AM
To: TYR@yahoogroups.com
Cc: macwheel99@...; Prof Chou
Subject: Space Economy and Science

 

The fact of China is expecting to overtake Japan as a direct challenger to the leadership status of the United States is become nearer. I predict some time in the year 2020-2030 the world will expect an unprecedented outbreak of a large scale dispute since World War II, such dispute drive to the birth of the Space Command. The American's strategic intent is to drive forward of a restructuring of the a new world order by forcing reorder of world' political blocs and induce super-high-technology competitions. By judging the current level of know-how in scientific and technological and space economy , only those countries which possesses such capacity are real 'potential adversaries' to United States's supreme powers. This belief will never change. Based on such projections, I predict that by 2020 the country has such capabilities will not be more than 20, the initiative of Washington to force 'Space Economy and Science' will restructure geopolitical powers into 'technological blocs', which is, those incompatible in 'Space economy and science' is 'very natural' regroup into on or two of those 'Space members'

 

由於中國超越日本而直接挑戰美國的地位距離事實越來越近,我預測在2020-2030年的某一年將爆發一場空前的爭執,而驅動了太空司令部。美國的戰略意圖在於重組世界政治版塊而推動超高科技的競爭。以目前的科技能力情況分佈判斷,任何有能力在太空經濟和科技和美國競爭的國家才是真正的'潛在對手'。如此推算,到了2020擁有如此能力的國家步會超過20個,那麼那些無法競爭的國家很自然的必須加入這些集團的一員。

 

 

吳人, EKG

 

關於ekg の故事 about ekg: www.aboutekg.wordpress.com

 

用文字表達思想, 用行動表達文字  Written expression of thought, written driven by actions

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.698 / Virus Database: 270.14.55/2490 - Release Date: 11/08/09 13:39:00


#38386 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 11:19 pm
Subject: Political Wisdom: Is the House Health Bill Too Small?
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The corrupted minds of the elite

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 


After a few days out of town, I’ve discovered that the obsession with analyzing health care hasn’t abated—nor should it have, considering the House’s historic vote to pass a reform bill on Saturday.

But the final House vote count seems the only fixed item in online analysis of where things stand now. Many write about conservative Democrats sweating over whether the bill calls for too much government and too much money, but Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic argues pretty much the opposite. He thinks the bill would be better if it were actually bigger, and kicked in faster. “Ideological arguments about socialized medicine and government takeovers don’t have much appeal beyond the conservative base,” he argues. “The rest of the population just wants relief (from rising health care costs) and security (from medical or financial hardship). If reform accomplishes that, they will be happy, no matter how long or complex the actual bill was. But does Saturday’s vote make that more likely? In many crucial ways, yes.”

Still, he says, “the transformation would be slow. In order to keep the total federal outlays for coverage at around $1 trillion over 10 years, the House bill wouldn’t create the new insurance exchanges…or start offering subsidies for several years. While it would offer more financial assistance and stronger insurance protection than its Senate counterpart is likely to promise, it wouldn’t do as much to reduce the cost of medical care in the long run…To be clear, the House bill is a great start. It should just be faster, stronger, and–really–bigger.”

Time’s Jay Newton-Small, writing on the Swampland blog, gives an on-the-other-hand view. He wonders whether House leaders asked too much of their Democratic rank-and-file followers by demand ing a vote now: “After the August protests there had been much speculation that the House would wait for the Senate to act….So why push through a bill now, the week after twin gubernatorial losses in New Jersey and Virigina and a day after the country hit 10% unemployment? Most members said, the leadership felt the time for debate had come to an end — after all (House Speaker Nancy) Pelosi had originally wanted to pass the bill before August recess but deferred in deference to anxious freshmen. They worried if the process wasn’t jump started, the Senate might falter and fail. But, having forced her vulnerables to take a hard vote on climate change, was it rash of Pelosi to rush a vote on health care — espeically if the Senate ends up not including a public plan in their bill (though as it stands right now Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says it will be in)? Many vulnerable Dems headed home this weekend feeling a bit battered and fearing what it means to go it alone, as Dems clearly are these days. ”

Debra J. Saunders of Townhall.com argues—perhaps a bit cynically—that Democrats have found a way to get young people to support a health overhaul. “The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee health care bill includes a provision that would allow parents to keep their children as dependents on their health care policies until age 26. Not to be outdone, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced last month that, as Congressional Quarterly reported, the House bill ‘will allow young people to stay on their parents’ policies until age 27.’ Do I hear age 28? Why not 30? As long as Washington is giving away private health care coverage, why not eliminate the age cap entirely?…Eureka. Pelosi has found the way to get young adults behind health care reform — have mom and dad (or their employers) pay for it. Of course young adults are jumping on the bandwagon.”


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38385 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 9:26 pm
Subject: Enemies of the People -- By: Benjamin Zycher
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Critical Condition on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Benjamin Zycher) on 11/9/09

It's official. The Joint Tax Committee informs us that under the terms of the Pelosi health-care bill, "Americans who do not maintain acceptable health insurance coverage and who choose not to pay the bill's new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years."

And so we have, yet again, a perfect illustration of the truism that socialism would work perfectly if only there were no people. Since we do have people, with all their self-interested motives and unwillingness to bend their inherent nature to ideological demands, socialism in practice encounters problems, known as Enemies of the People.

No wonder Pelosi et al. want desperately to jam this legislation through the House before lawmakers go home for the Veterans Day break and encounter Tea Parties more numerous and louder than before. How has American self-government come to this?

-- Benjamin Zycher is a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute.



 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38384 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:53 pm
Subject: City Streets a Mortal Threat to Pedestrians
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
To me the travesty of our times is that when I was a child in the 50s in the far distant suburbs, we had sidewalks on all streets, on both sides of the street. You can now find entire suburbs without sidewalks. I find that so reckless and selfish and anti-good-neighborly and anti-good-health and anti-kids. Why has government gotton so big in areas it has no historical business delving into but leaving areas it longed was involved in? Same with lifeguards at swimming pools. Now it's swim at your own risk (no lifeguard) signs everywhere. I never saw that as a child.

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Wired Top Stories by Jason Kambitsis on 11/9/09

More than 43,000 pedestrians have died in traffic accidents this decade, which makes up 11.8 percent of all traffic deaths, according to a new report. But less than 1.5 percent of transportation funds are spent on pedestrian safety measures.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38383 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:13 pm
Subject: NY Times Portrays Catholic Medal of Honor Winner as Muslim -- By: NRO Staff
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (NRO Staff) on 11/9/09

In this New York Times story on Muslims serving in the U.S. military, the Times presents Navy SEAL Michael Monsoor, who earned the Congressional Medal of Honor for throwing himself on a grenade to save his team members in 2006, as a Muslim. It quotes a Muslim Army reservist who cites Monsoor as an example of a Muslim service member who gave his life for his country, and the Times lets the assertion stand. But Monsoor was a devout Catholic, as his Department of Defense official biography clearly states.
 — Andrew Cline is editorial-page editor of the New Hampshire Union Leader.




 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38382 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:09 pm
Subject: Shocking numbers: Real unemployment tops 22%
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 


Obama figures deliberately understate economic downturn

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38381 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:09 pm
Subject: iPhone-Windows 7 sync bug with Intel chipset fixed for some
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via AppleInsider on 11/9/09

A bug with Intel's P55 chipset prevents Windows 7 from syncing their iPhone, and motherboard manufacturer Gigabyte has issued a BIOS update to resolve the issue for some.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38380 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 6:24 pm
Subject: Nidal Hasan’s calling card explained
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
amazing, just amazing -- drill thru to ultimate link. Nice to see Michelle Malkin giving tribute to Pamela at Atlas Shrugs.

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38379 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 6:13 pm
Subject: Two Profiles in Class -- By: NRO Staff
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (NRO Staff) on 11/9/09

This past weekend, Americans were treated to two completely different profiles in class. First there was former president George W. Bush. On Friday night, George and Laura Bush traveled by car to Fort Hood to meet with the devastated families of last week’s tragedy. They specifically asked the base commander not to alert the press, and spent hours simply doing what they could to comfort the grief-stricken families.

The story was eventually uncovered, as these moments tend to be, but clearly President Bush did not see this as a personal opportunity, nor did he want to upstage the current president. The former president saw his interactions with wounded soldiers and their families as private moments.

Twenty-four hours later, President Obama was not at Fort Hood, but rather on Capitol Hill lobbying a private meeting of Democrats, who must not have known his position on health care. Obama told the lawmakers, according to Democratic congressman Earl Blumenauer in the New York Times: “Does anybody think that the teabag, anti-government people are going to support them if they bring down health care? All it will do is confuse and dispirit [Democratic voters] and it will encourage the extremists.”

Let’s dissect that statement. First, President Obama incorrectly states that conservatives are “anti-government,” which simply is untrue. Conservatives are in favor of the government’s performing its duties efficiently and effectively. Conservatives are not in favor of the government’s running a new national health-care entitlement that will surely fail. (The House passed a bill that costs $2.4 trillion, raises taxes by $700 billion, and massively expands a bankrupt Medicaid program -- all while the nation’s unemployment rate stands above 10 percent.)

More disturbing is President Obama’s labeling his opposition as “extremists” and falling just short of using the profane “teabag” epithet that is popular among dismissive liberals. This is simply beneath the office he holds. When tens of thousands of multigenerational families descended onto Capitol Hill last week, they were protesting runaway federal spending and government control. They understood that while reform of our health-care system is necessary, the answer is not to compound the problem while ignoring uninsured Americans. These are not extreme views.

President Obama won a short-lived victory this weekend on health care, but he clearly misread the tea leaves if he believes that conservative Democrats will get more support in their home districts for supporting this disastrous plan. These electoral matters are not helped by the president’s demonization of a respectful and vigilant opposition to this government intrusion into their lives.

While President Bush was at Fort Hood consoling the victims of real radical extremism, President Obama was in Washington calling American families who don’t support his health-care plan “extremists.” A more enlightening profile of the two men could not be found.

-- Rory Cooper is director of strategic communications at the Heritage Foundation.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38378 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 6:08 pm
Subject: After the House Vote -- By: James C. Capretta
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Critical Condition on National Review Online by webmaster@... (James C. Capretta) on 11/9/09

Conservatives need to hammer home four points to shift indepedent voters and moderate Democrats even more decisively against enactment of Obamacare.

One, Obamacare will impose substantial new costs on the already insured middle-class. The bill approved by the House establishes one-size-fits-all insurance rules which will drive up premiums and raises taxes on the health-care sector which will be passed onto middle-class health-care consumers.

Two, Obamacare will destroy jobs. The House bill would impose an 8 percent payroll tax on all but the smallest employers who do not offer health insurance and a 5.4 percent income tax surcharge on higher income individuals who also own small businesses. These taxes will discourage hiring and force layoffs when the number one concern of most American voters is job creation.

Three, Obamacare will ration care. The House bill relies almost exclusively on arbitrary, across-the-board payment rate reductions for health-care providers to achieve savings. If passed, that would just be the beginning of it. Despite all of the talk of painless efficiency measures, the Democratic sponsors really have no plan to control costs except with price-setting. Always and everywhere, price controls drive out willing suppliers of services, leading to queues and waiting lists.

Fourth, Obamacare is entirely unnecessary. We can fix the problems in U.S. health-care without a government takeover by pursuing sensible, targeted reforms. With properly structured high-risk pools and insurance regulation, pre-existing conditions could be insured at reasonable costs. With tax credits and small-business reforms (such as those implemented in Utah), most of the uninsured would have access to coverage. And the competitive model used to deliver Medicare drug coverage should serve as the basis for controlling costs.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38377 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 6:03 pm
Subject: Could Encasing Cities in Giant Domes Be an Energy Solution for Our Future?
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via INHABITAT by Bridgette Meinhold on 11/9/09

Winooski Dome, Winooski, Vermon, Geoengineering, Concept, Reduce Energy, reduce emissions,

Back in 1979, Winooski, Vermont, a town that often experiences -20 degree weather in January, proposed building a giant dome over their city to help reduce energy costs and keep warm throughout the winter. Thirty years ago, we were experiencing an energy crisis with rising oil prices, and people were looking for solutions to reduce their costs. Nowadays, while we’re also looking to reduce our carbon footprint in addition to costs, the concept is still applicable. By doming off the small city of 7,000, Winooski could stay warm all year round, reduce energy costs and emissions, grow food all year, and ban cars inside the dome. Environmentally, it seems like it has potential.

What do you think?

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.Winooski Dome, Winooski, Vermon, Geoengineering, Concept, Reduce Energy, reduce emissions, Winooski Dome, Winooski, Vermon, Geoengineering, Concept, Reduce Energy, reduce emissions, Winooski Dome, Winooski, Vermon, Geoengineering, Concept, Reduce Energy, reduce emissions, Winooski Dome, Winooski, Vermon, Geoengineering, Concept, Reduce Energy, reduce emissions,


Read the rest of Could Encasing Cities in Giant Domes Be an Energy Solution for Our Future?


Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | digg
Post tags: , , , , , , ,


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38376 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 5:26 pm
Subject: Senior Dem 'confident' Stupak amendment will be stripped
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Senior Dem 'confident' Stupak amendment will be stripped

By Michael O'Brien - 11/09/09 11:50 AM ET

A top House Democrat said Monday she's "confident" that a conference committee will strip language in the House health bill on taxpayer funding for abortion.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), the Democrats' chief deputy whip in the House, said that she and other pro-choice lawmakers would work to strip the amendment included in the House health bill that bars federal funding from going to subsidize abortions.

"I am confident that when it comes back from the conference committee that that language won't be there," Wasserman Schultz said during an appearance on MSNBC. "And I think we're all going to be working very hard, particularly the pro-choice members, to make sure that's the case."

The amendment, offered by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), won the support of Republicans and some centrist Democrats in the House. The amendment was allowed a vote in a concession to Stupak and other pro-life Democrats who had threatened to fell the House bill unless language on federal support for pregnancy termination was clarified.

The conference between the House and Senate bills after the upper chamber passes its bill will present an opportunity to strip the Stupak amendment, and liberal Democrats have vowed to work hard to get rid of that language during that stage of the legislation.

"It was extremely painful for me to feel compelled to vote for a bill that contained that kind of restriction on a woman's ability to make her own reproductive choices," Wasserman Schultz said.

It's not clear how or whether such a manuever would affect House votes for the legislation -- including the only Republican vote for the legislation; Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao (R-La.) said the Stupak amendment cleared the way for him to support the legislation.

Update: The Republican National Committee's rapid response team captured the video:


#38375 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 5:17 pm
Subject: 18-year-old ‘mentored’ by Nidal Malik Hasan says Fort Hood Victims Got What ...
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Atlas Shrugs by Pamela Geller on 11/9/09

The government has one job, ONE, to defend this nation - everything else they do and take from us  is the booty that they have stolen from the American people,. Recklessly we let them because, first and foremost, they have kept us  safe. Until now.

No more.

Why are these Muslim  invaders allowed to carry on freely in this country - protected by outreach, Obama, and PC mental illness. Sharia law must be outlawed. JIHAD must be outlawed and criminalized severely. If adherents to Islam won't reform their deadly, violent ideology, then they can't stay here. ZERO TOLERANCE FOR JIHAD.  Let them destroy themselves in their own countries.

With four out of five mosques in the US preaching hate, mosques must be monitored. This is the defining issue of out time. There will be a rout in 2010.2012, the right best get behind a leader that gets it. And will fight it unafraid. It's two minutes after midnight.

Questions were being asked in Texas this weekend about the friendship between the US Army psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 people in a shooting spree at the Fort Hood military base last Thursday, and a young man called Duane Reasoner Jnr. Interviewed by the BBC on Friday, Reasoner said he felt no pity for Hasan's victims because "they were troops who were going to Afghanistan and Iraq to kill Muslims".

A tape of the interview, conducted by Gavin Lee of the BBC, has ended up on YouTube and other sites and is getting an angry response from Americans still shocked by Hasan's deadly rampage.

Reasoner is 20 years younger than Hasan. The pair became friends through the local mosque in Killeen - the nearest town to the vast army camp - where Hasan regularly prayed and where Reasoner, who was brought up as a Catholic, was completing his conversion to Islam.

According to reports in the New York Times and elsewhere, Reasoner is a substitute teacher whose parents work on the Fort Hood base. He was being mentored by Hasan in the ways of Islam. But the older man, who is single, would also treat him to dinner at the Golden Corral steakhouse in Killeen and on two occasions invited Reasoner to his apartment - the second time being last Wednesday night, just hours before Hasan went on his killing spree.

Hasan once gave a lecture about Islam to fellow doctors in which he said non-believers should be beheaded
Fort Hood shooting; Nidal Malik Hasan

Reasoner was quoted in the New York Times as saying that Hasan had recently been told he would be sent to Afghanistan on November 28, and he did not like it.

"He said he should quit the Army," Reasoner said. "In the Koran, you're not supposed to have alliances with Jews or Christian or others, and if you are killed in the military fighting against Muslims, you will go to hell."

But when he was interviewed by Gavin Lee of the BBC, he went further.

Reasoner: "I'm not going to condemn him for what he did. I don't know why he did it. I will not, absolutely not, condemn him for what he had done though. If he had done it for selfish reasons I still will not condemn him. He's my brother in the end. I will never condemn him."

Lee: "There might be a lot of people shocked to hear you say that."

Reasoner: "Well, that's the way it is. I don't speak for the community here but me personally I will not condemn him."

Lee: "What are your thoughts towards those that were victims in this?"

Reasoner: "They were, in the end, they were troops who were going to Afghanistan and Iraq to kill Muslims. I honestly have no pity for them. It's just like the majority of the people that will hear this, after five or six minutes they'll be shocked, after that they'll forget about them and go on their day."

Evidence has also emerged to suggest that Hasan himself was not just a "devout" Muslim, but was more extreme in his beliefs than reported on Friday. Several former colleagues have come forward to say he would tell them: "I am a Muslim first and an American second".

The Daily Telegraph claims that when he was still at the Walter Reed medical centre in Washington DC, where he worked for six years before being transferred to Fort Hood this summer, Hasan once gave a lecture about Islam to fellow doctors in which he said non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38374 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 5:18 pm
Subject: Your Attendance is Required!
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
If you live close, attend.

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Atlas Shrugs by Pamela Geller on 11/9/09

We are being lied to - and it's our very existence that  is at stake. Do your duty as an American, no one is going to do it for you.

The media, law enforcement and authorities at the highest level are deceiving us about the invaders, the enemies in our midst. they are lying to us about Major Musilin Nidal Hasan, they are lying to us about Rifqa Bary. They are lying to us about the jihad in America.

If you believe in Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, human rights, and rule of law. Join me and our fighters for freedom and the American way.  Fight the islamisation of America.

On November 16th, Americans of all stripes are converging on Columbus Ohio to rally for truth, justice and our unalienable rights.

It's time, its not too late.

 STAND UP! GET UP! STAND UP FOR YOUR LIFE!

PLEASE JOIN ATLAS SHRUGS, JIHAD WATCH, DR. BOSTOM 

HUMAN RIGHTS RALLY!

A RALLY FOR RIFQA'S CIVIL RIGHTS
ON THE DAY OF HER NEXT HEARING NOVEMBER 16TH
"DORRIAN COMMONS PARK"
ACROSS THE STREET FROM
FRANKLIN COUNTY JUVENILE COURT
11AM - 2PM

Hearing is a 3pm
Franklin County Courthouse
Franklin County juvenile court
4th floor
373 S. High street
Columbus, Ohio  43215 

 
Phone:  614.462.4411, Franklin County Juvenile Court clerk

Simon Deng - ex-slave from Sudan

Nonie Darwish - Executive Director, Former Muslims United

James Lafferty - chairman of the Virginia Anti-Sharia Task Force

Amal Imani, Iranian dissident and pro-democracy reformer

Jamal Jivanjee - apostate, Pastor and Rifqa's friend

Patricia Said, mother of Amina and Sarah Said

Honor killing victims' family members

Geller!

Spencer!

Bostom!


THERE WILL BE SPEAKERS, FELLOW APOSTATES FROM ISLAM, INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS FIGHTING BLASPHEMY LAWS AND DEFENDING FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE AGE OF JIHAD. I IMPLORE YOU TO STAND WITH THIS GIRL. SHE REPRESENTS AMERICA IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ENCROACHING SHARIA LAW.

Directions to the Franklin County Courthouse & Rally:  Franklin County Juvenile Court, 373 South High Street, Columbus (Ohio).

Dorrian

All details here.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38373 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 5:15 pm
Subject: Second-Guessing Stupak -- By: Ramesh Ponnuru
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The counterpoint argument.

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Ramesh Ponnuru) on 11/9/09

As John McCormack reports, a few conservatives have complained that Republicans shouldn't have voted for the Stupak amendment. Instead, goes the theory, they should have voted "present" in sufficient numbers to keep it from passing, thus forcing pro-life Democrats to vote against the underlying bill and potentially bringing it down. (Something like this view has been expressed on NRO too.) McCormack argues that this tactic would not have worked.

It would have had significant downsides. It would have created a serious problem among Republicans with many rank-and-file pro-lifers, who would have wondered why Republicans weren't voting for an important pro-life measure. Pro-life Democratic congressmen would have felt betrayed: All year Republicans had been egging them on to fight the abortion subsidies in the bill, only to desert them in the middle of the fight? Democrats would have gotten a new talking point: They would have said that the vote proved that Republican objections to the bill were phony, since Republicans weren't willing to support amendments to address those objections. Their charge that Republicans were merely playing political games to deny the Democrats a victory would look more credible. Press coverage about the Republicans' insincerity would have been brutal.

And all of these reactions--from pro-life voters, pro-life Democratic congressmen, partisan Democrats, and the press--would have been justified. Oh, and one more thing: The likelihood that we would end up with a bill with abortion subsidies in it would be much higher.

I wonder what the advocates of this tactic think pro-life groups should have done? Should they have refrained from urging congressmen to cast a pro-life vote on the most important abortion-policy question before the House this year in the interest of affecting the outcome of a bill that is outside their bailiwick? Pro-life groups sometimes get slammed as arms of the Republican party, but people who want to craft strategy for Republicans ought to keep in mind that there are actually a lot of people in the party who care about abortion.

Thankfully, almost all congressional Republicans did the right thing.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38372 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 3:38 pm
Subject: ABC: FBI knew Hasan tried to contact Al-Qaeda
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38371 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 3:36 pm
Subject: Nuts -- By: Mark Steyn
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Mark Steyn) on 11/9/09

For the purposes of argument, let's accept the media's insistence that Major Hasan is a lone crazy.

So who's nuttier?

The guy who gives a lecture to other military doctors in which he says non-Muslims should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats?

Or the guys who say "Hey, let's have this fellow counsel our traumatized veterans and then promote him to major and put him on a Homeland Security panel?

Or the Army Chief of Staff who thinks the priority should be to celebrate diversity, even unto death?

Or the Secretary of Homeland Security who warns that the principal threat we face now is an outbreak of Islamophobia?

Or the President who says we cannot "fully know" why Major Hasan did what he did, so why trouble ourselves any further?

Or the columnist who, when a man hands out copies of the Koran before gunning down his victims while yelling "Allahu akbar", says you're racist if you bring up his religion?

Or his media colleagues who put Americans in the same position as East Germans twenty years ago of having to get hold of a foreign newspaper to find out what's going on?

General Casey has a point: An army that lets you check either the "home team" or "enemy" box according to taste is certainly diverse. But the logic in the remarks of Secretary Napolitano and others is that the real problem is that most Americans are knuckledragging bigots just waiting to go bananas. As Melanie Phillips wrote in her book Londonistan:

Minority-rights doctrine has produced a moral inversion, in which those doing wrong are excused if they belong to a 'victim' group, while those at the receiving end of their behaviour are blamed simply because they belong to the 'oppressive' majority.

To the injury of November 5th, we add the insults of American officialdom and their poodle media. In a nutshell:

The real enemy — in the sense of the most important enemy — isn’t a bunch of flea-bitten jihadis sitting in a cave somewhere. It’s Western civilization’s craziness. We are setting our hair on fire and putting it out with a hammer.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38370 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 3:32 pm
Subject: Paging the AMA: Wake Up -- By: Jason Fodeman
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via Critical Condition on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Jason Fodeman) on 11/9/09

Last week the American Medical Association became the latest special-interest group to line up behind President Obama in support of Obamacare. The AMA is the largest physicians’ organization in the country, and many laymen think of it as the impartial voice of the profession. But moves to the left such as this are precisely why the group has seen its membership plummet to the point where today only 18 percent of practicing physicians are members. Despite the AMA’s support, a recent IBD/TIPP poll found that 65 percent of doctors oppose Obamacare. Most doctors agree that reform is needed -- just not Obama’s prescription.

The AMA has evidently decided that it’s better to be sitting at the table than to be on the menu. While this self-serving approach may be in the best interests of the organization itself and its board members’ appointment prospects, it is difficult to envision how the AMA’s position serves the constituency it purports to represent.

AdvaMed, the trade lobby representing medical-device manufacturers, made the same erroneous calculation. It supported a bill that most likely is not in the industry’s best interests . . . or anyone else’s, for that matter. AdvaMed thought it was limiting its losses by signing on with the Democrats’ plan, but before it could even receive a thank-you note, Senator Baucus threw the industry under the bus with a $40 billion tax on medical devices. Unfortunately, it is only a matter of time before doctors meet a similar fate.

Obamacare is brutal for doctors and patients. Any bill with a public-plan option based on Medicare’s sub-market reimbursement rates will significantly deplete physician income, but the detriment to physicians transcends dollars and cents. The bills being debated will strip away doctors’ autonomy and drown them in bureaucracy and paperwork. This will allow them to spend even less time with patients and will drain whatever satisfaction remains from the field.

The current Democratic regime has engaged in unprecedented arm-twisting with those reluctant to toe the party line. It has brought to K Street a style of politics usually reserved for the back streets around Wrigley Field -- from waging a full-scale assault on average Americans exercising their First Amendment rights at town-hall meetings to requiring insurance-company executives who refuse to play ball to testify before Congress. It would be naïve to think that when push comes to shove, the administration would refrain from using such hardball tactics against those in white coats.

A time will come when costs soar as more patients join the system, and liberal pipe dreams of huge savings from preventive medicine and electronic health records fail to materialize. Ultimately the savings will have to come from somewhere, and most likely it won’t be from trial lawyers.

Perhaps then the AMA will regret its opportunistic cynicism, but it will be too late to prevent physician services from being discounted to blue-plate-special rates.

-- Jason D. Fodeman, M.D., is a former health-policy fellow at the Heritage Foundation and author of How to Destroy a Village: What the Clintons Taught a Seventeen-Year-Old.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38369 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 2:55 pm
Subject: 'Diversity,' 'Tragedy,' and the Army -- By: Roger Clegg
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Roger Clegg) on 11/9/09

From a New York Times story: General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, said Sunday in an interview on CNN’s State of the Union, with regard to a possible anti-Muslim backlash in the Army in the wake of the Fort Hood shootings:  “It would be a shame -- as great a tragedy as this was -- it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.”  And on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos, he said: “A diverse Army gives us strength.”  The Times said (not directly quoting General Casey) that this was “an indication of the Army’s effort to ward off bias against the more than 3,000 Muslims in its ranks.”

As I’ve said many times in the affirmative-action context, there’s nothing wrong with diversity, but its advantages are greatly exaggerated, and they certainly do not justify the discrimination that routinely takes place in its name. Likewise, even if there are some nice things about having a diverse Army, it is hardly “a shame” if the Army becomes somewhat less diverse in order to keep our soldiers from being killed. “A diverse Army gives us strength” only if it is non-diverse when it comes to things like loyalty and reliability. This does not mean that Muslim soldiers are inherently disloyal or unreliable -- of course that is not true -- but it does mean that the scrutiny of soldiers’ loyalty and reliability ought not be discouraged because it has, horrors!, a politically incorrect “disparate impact” on some demographic groups. And nobody should be intimidated from doing the right thing because someone may say it’s discrimination.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38368 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 2:55 pm
Subject: 'Diversity,' 'Tragedy,' and the Army -- By: Roger Clegg
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Roger Clegg) on 11/9/09

From a New York Times story: General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, said Sunday in an interview on CNN’s State of the Union, with regard to a possible anti-Muslim backlash in the Army in the wake of the Fort Hood shootings:  “It would be a shame -- as great a tragedy as this was -- it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.”  And on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos, he said: “A diverse Army gives us strength.”  The Times said (not directly quoting General Casey) that this was “an indication of the Army’s effort to ward off bias against the more than 3,000 Muslims in its ranks.”

As I’ve said many times in the affirmative-action context, there’s nothing wrong with diversity, but its advantages are greatly exaggerated, and they certainly do not justify the discrimination that routinely takes place in its name. Likewise, even if there are some nice things about having a diverse Army, it is hardly “a shame” if the Army becomes somewhat less diverse in order to keep our soldiers from being killed. “A diverse Army gives us strength” only if it is non-diverse when it comes to things like loyalty and reliability. This does not mean that Muslim soldiers are inherently disloyal or unreliable -- of course that is not true -- but it does mean that the scrutiny of soldiers’ loyalty and reliability ought not be discouraged because it has, horrors!, a politically incorrect “disparate impact” on some demographic groups. And nobody should be intimidated from doing the right thing because someone may say it’s discrimination.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38367 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 2:54 pm
Subject: It’s Business Time for Business-Method Patents
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via WSJ.com: Law Blog by Ashby Jones on 11/9/09

patentAt long last, business-method patents will have their moment in the spotlight. The Supreme Court on Monday will take up the issue, holding arguments in the In Re Bilski case, which has been on our radar screen for nearly two years. Click here, here, here and here for LB background.

The WSJ’s Supreme Court correspondent Jess Bravin has a curtain-raiser today on the case, which raises this rather straightforward question: When can a business method be patented? Click here, as well, for a writeup from last week over at Scotusblog.

Business-method patents, of which Amazon’s one-click checkout and Priceline’s reverse auction represent two examples, have been kicking around for over a decade, ever since the Federal Circuit’s State Street decision, which expanded the scope of processes that could be patented.

The Supreme Court must now determine whether such swaths of modern business activity deserve patent protections, thereby opening the door to infringement lawsuits, or belong in the public domain, depriving their inventors of monopoly profits.

One large group of companies, among them those that develop software and pharmaceuticals, like IBM and Novartis, are urging the Supreme Court to maintain “patent protection for broad categories of cutting-edge innovation” rather than link the protection to “primitive physical technology,” as one of the briefs puts it.

But other companies, including Google, Symantec and Transamerica, are telling the justices that expanding the scope of business-method patents could expose them to infringement lawsuits over, as one brief says, “the very mental processes and ideas that are the building blocks of innovation.” (The NYT editorial page over the weekend largely sided with this perspective.)

Still, business method patents were relatively rare until the 1998 State Street decision, after which “a flood of business method patents came through the door,” says Jon Dudas, a former director of the Patent Office who is now a partner with Foley Lardner.

One such application came from Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw, two friends who worked together in the 1990s at the natural gas utility in Pittsburgh. The two wondered whether there was a way to hedge transactions against weather patterns so that a middleman could offer uniform prices to consumers and providers alike. The duo devised mathematical formulas for managing the risks on both sides, and filed a patent application describing a business method built around those formulas.

The Patent Office denied the application, saying the invention “merely manipulates [an] abstract idea and solves a purely mathematical problem.” The federal circuit upheld that decision. Writing in October 2008, Chief Judge Paul Michel reined in his court’s sweeping 1998 language, holding that to be patented, a process must be “tied to a particular machine or apparatus” or transform “a particular article into a different state or thing.”

Now it’s up to the Supreme Court to decide.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38366 From: "EKG" <juliangoh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 1:27 pm
Subject: 242.10 The transfer of hegemony ( Charles P. Kindleberger) in the 21st Century
juliangoh@...
Send Email Send Email
 
242.10

The transfer of hegemony ( Charles P. Kindleberger) in the 21st Century 

On November 4th 2009, Denny Roy of the East-West Center warned "US-China relations have been dynamic adjustment, based on historical experience, the Chinese will take over as the dominant view of the world, could prompt the United States by means of war to prevent the transfer of global power to China".
 


Source in Chinese: http://war.news.163.com/09/1109/10/...NP00011MTO.html 

My respond:

The fact of China is expecting to overtake Japan as a direct challenger to the leadership status of the United States is become nearer. I predict some time in the year 2020-2030 the world will expect an unprecedented outbreak of a large scale dispute since World War II, such dispute drive to the birth of the Space Command. The American's strategic intent is to drive forward of a restructuring of the a new world order by forcing reorder of world' political blocs and induce super-high-technology competitions. By judging the current level of know-how in scientific and technological and space economy , only those countries which possesses such capacity are real 'potential adversaries' to United States's supreme powers. This belief will never change. Based on such projections, I predict that by 2020 the country has such capabilities will not be more than 20, the initiative of Washington to force 'Space Economy and Science' will restructure geopolitical powers into 'technological blocs', which is, those incompatible in 'Space economy and science' is 'very natural' regroup into on or two of those 'Space members' 

由於中國超越日本而直接挑戰美國的地位距離事實越來越近,我預測在2020-2030年的某一年將爆發一場空前的爭執,而驅動了太空司令部。美國的戰略意圖在於重組世界政治版塊而推動超高科技的競爭。以目前的科技能力情況分佈判斷,任何有能力在太空經濟和科技和美國競爭的國家才是真正的'潛在對手'。如此推算,到了2020擁有如此能力的國家步會超過20個,那麼那些無法競爭的國家很自然的必須加入這些集團的一員。
 
 
吳人, EKG
 
關於ekg の故事 about ekg: www.aboutekg.wordpress.com
 
用文字表達思想, 用行動表達文字  Written expression of thought, written driven by actions

#38365 From: "jmason7" <jmason03@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 1:21 pm
Subject: Who's here
jmason7
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I still read the posts.  With my job and school I do not have much time to
browse the internet and find the posts a worthwhile news source.

Thanks.

#38364 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 1:21 pm
Subject: Catching the Mass Murder Disease -- By: Michael Ledeen
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via The Corner on National Review Online by webmaster@... (Michael Ledeen) on 11/8/09

Amazing, even in our endlessly surprising times, that so many people are embracing the theory that Major Hasan "contracted PTSD" from the returning troops he "treated."

As a very smart friend of mine said last night, that's like saying that an oncologist can get cancer by treating cancer victims.





 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38363 From: Roleigh Martin <roleigh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 1:19 pm
Subject: The Obama Family vs. the Family of a Natural Born Citizen
marti124
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
A picture is worth 10,000 words they say. This has nothing to do with where Obama was born.

 
 

Sent to you by Roleigh Martin via Google Reader:

 
 

via (title unknown) by John Charlton on 11/8/09

“GRAPHICALLY” EXPLAINED, IN BOTH SENSES OF THE WORD by John Charlton (Nov. 8, 2009) — They’re out there, circulating on the web, but The Post & Email will republish them anyway, because they are so eloquent.  For those of you who want visual aides to explain the Natural Born citizenship requirement for holding the U.S. Presidency, [...]

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

#38362 From: "EKG" <juliangoh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:58 pm
Subject: Space Economy and Science
juliangoh@...
Send Email Send Email
 
The fact of China is expecting to overtake Japan as a direct challenger to the leadership status of the United States is become nearer. I predict some time in the year 2020-2030 the world will expect an unprecedented outbreak of a large scale dispute since World War II, such dispute drive to the birth of the Space Command. The American's strategic intent is to drive forward of a restructuring of the a new world order by forcing reorder of world' political blocs and induce super-high-technology competitions. By judging the current level of know-how in scientific and technological and space economy , only those countries which possesses such capacity are real 'potential adversaries' to United States's supreme powers. This belief will never change. Based on such projections, I predict that by 2020 the country has such capabilities will not be more than 20, the initiative of Washington to force 'Space Economy and Science' will restructure geopolitical powers into 'technological blocs', which is, those incompatible in 'Space economy and science' is 'very natural' regroup into on or two of those 'Space members'
 
由於中國超越日本而直接挑戰美國的地位距離事實越來越近,我預測在2020-2030年的某一年將爆發一場空前的爭執,而驅動了太空司令部。美國的戰略意圖在於重組世界政治版塊而推動超高科技的競爭。以目前的科技能力情況分佈判斷,任何有能力在太空經濟和科技和美國競爭的國家才是真正的'潛在對手'。如此推算,到了2020擁有如此能力的國家步會超過20個,那麼那些無法競爭的國家很自然的必須加入這些集團的一員。
 
 
吳人, EKG
 
關於ekg の故事 about ekg: www.aboutekg.wordpress.com
 
用文字表達思想, 用行動表達文字  Written expression of thought, written driven by actions

#38361 From: "EKG" <juliangoh@...>
Date: Mon Nov 9, 2009 6:08 am
Subject: Re: Who all participates or reads at TYR@YahooGroups.Com anymore
juliangoh@...
Send Email Send Email
 
hehehe ... I remember not more than 10 active names and members. once a while.  
 
吳人, EKG
 
關於ekg の故事 about ekg: www.aboutekg.wordpress.com
 
用文字表達思想, 用行動表達文字  Written expression of thought, written driven by actions

From: Bob Speth
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:53 PM
Subject: RE: [TYR] Who all participates or reads at TYR@YahooGroups.Com anymore

 

Yes, I'm still here. But I'm generally a lurker.

Bob




To: TYR@YahooGroups.com
From: roleigh@pobox.com
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 14:49:55 -0600
Subject: [TYR] Who all participates or reads at TYR@YahooGroups.Com anymore

 
Is this YahooGroup nothing more than Ken and me posting?  I'm curious if this group still has any audience.  Bob is still around, right?  Any others?




Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.


Messages 38361 - 38390 of 39551   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help