Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
TheAoISCT · The Association of ISC Theorists
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Numerical Origins, Part Two   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #128 of 181 |
Re: Numerical Origins, Part Two

To: Captain Jim,

Thank you for your comments. Your participation is greatly
appreciated. I would thus like to continue along these lines, and
respond a little to your post.

You Wrote:
That's an interesting premise... that astrology is linked to
tachyonics. Astrology is based on a sort of "action at a distance"
principle... the idea that stars and planets billions of miles away
can have an almost instantaneous effect on people and things on earth
in general. Maybe it isn't exactly instantaneous but just really,
really fast (ftl... like a tachyon). Its interesting to note that
action at a distance is the phrase that is also used to describe
Newtonian gravity. And gravity is also postulated to be the result
of tachyonic action.

My Response:
Actually, the concept of instantaneous action-at-a-distance for
gravity was not Newton's idea, and he disapproved of it.
It was the contention of another scientist named Cotes, whose
suggestion happened to become popular, and is still with us.
Newton himself believed in what you hinted; that gravity acts at a
distance, but not instantaneously (i.e., not with infinite speed).
He believed that there was indeed an agent of some kind, and that it
acts faster-than-light (though not infinitely so), yet he left the
question as to the true nature of this agent quite open to debate.
My thesis on gravity, which involves a special type of tachyon as the
gravitational-exchange particle, answers that question.
[ See "Tachyonic Gravity" at www.TachyonicsSociety.com ]

You Also Wrote:
As far as the idea of the seat of our emotions being tachyonic. I'm
not so sure. I think most of it is just simple biochemistry,
however, I'm not willing to rule out that some component of our
nervous system might be influenced by quantum effects. And quantum
effects are, again thought to be the result of tachyonic activity.
So while I don't see emotions as purely the result of tachyons, they
could very well be a factor in the workings of them but I think
acting on an even more basic level than emotions. They might be the
origin of our "soul". Which brings us back to the idea that the soul
works or exists in some "astral" plane. The connection of course is
the astral- part of astrology.

My Response:
Allow me to clarify. By suggesting that the "seat" of our emotions
is tachyonic, I do not rule out the biochemical factors, and agree
largely with what you said. Obviously, detectable external stimuli
will cause our emotions to change, but so will undetectable stimuli,
such as our thoughts.
When we hear an old song that brings up either happy or sad memories,
it can stir our emotions quite effectively. But what exactly is doing
the stirring?
I believe that our emotions, our mind, and our life-force are all
interrelated at the quantum level, just as you noted, but view them
as significantly different from each other.
The life-force, it seems to me, must be a tachyonic field that
permeates the entire universe, and our physical bodies are animated
by merely interacting with it.
Our minds also work because our physical brains interact with another
kind of tachyonic field, and our emotions have their field too.
In that sense, therefore, because tachyonic fields of any sort must
be represented as actual-imaginary fields, mathematically, then they
can logically be labeled as spiritual (astral) in nature. Hence the
connection to astrological influences from the planets and stars;
assuming, of course, that celestial objects emit tachyonic radiation
of different kinds, in addition to detectable forms of radiation,
such as photons constituting electric and magnetic fields; the quanta
of gravity alreacy assumed to be a special type of tachyon [although
there is evidence that photons themselves have tachyonic substructure
(are made of very small tachyons)].
Put more broadly, Tachyonics allows us to postulate a superluminal
foundation for the observable universe. That is, the ultimate
building-blocks for everything we know (whether you view such
constituents as string-like, as point-particles, or as something
else) are probably super-small tachyons. And, therefore, many of the
interaction energies assocaited with life, the universe, and
everything, in addition to detectable energies, will necessarily be
tachyonic in nature.






Sun Apr 22, 2007 2:45 pm

hkurtrichter
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #128 of 181 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

(continued) TWELVE When we combine the numbers of a major pair of opposites in the basic unit (1-4) --- the flow of Time (female 3) and the structure of Space...
Paul Albertsen
zreunion
Offline Send Email
Apr 15, 2007
8:24 pm

To: Paul, Thank you for posting to The AoISCT message board. I am pleased to allow you to present your ideas, which I find intersting, because I too...
hkurtrichter
Offline Send Email
Apr 21, 2007
2:33 pm

... which ... electric, ... human ... are ... That's an interesting premise... that astrology is linked to tachyonics. Astrology is based on a sort of "action...
captjim
brightestnew...
Offline Send Email
Apr 22, 2007
7:07 am

To: Captain Jim, Thank you for your comments. Your participation is greatly appreciated. I would thus like to continue along these lines, and respond a...
hkurtrichter
Offline Send Email
Apr 22, 2007
2:46 pm

In a message dated 4/22/2007 7:46:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, hkurtrichter@... writes: I believe that our emotions, our mind, and our life-force are...
Jonesalonzo1@...
brightestnew...
Offline Send Email
Apr 23, 2007
12:56 am

... these (3?) fields? ... Exactly. And more! Consider this. Physicists know of at least four fundamental forces of nature; gravity, electromagnetism, and...
hkurtrichter
Offline Send Email
Apr 27, 2007
1:36 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help