Well, I've seen nothing so far that contradicts your superluminal
gravity ideas. I've just recently started reading this thread but
all I could see is that Merlin thinks you don't have the credentials
to be credible. I say, that that your titles have nothing to do
with whether your ideas are true or not. I say, stick to the ideas.
Comment on those. The closest he's come to addressing the real issues
in the few posts I've read is to say that you don't have a good
enough mathematical formulation for him to take the ideas seriously.
He references a website which shows the type of math he expects to
see. This would be great if, like the theories on the site, a
number of mathematicians from a number of disciplines had worked on
the problem over a number of years. Unfortunately, you are
pretty much working alone and have only so far just scratched the
surface of what potential there is in this theory. Merlin might
have a valid point though, that you need better math attached to your
theory but you never claimed otherwise.