Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
TheoryOfEverything
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Avogadro's Constant in QR   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #17834 of 29588 |
--- In 4DWorldx@yahoogroups.com, "Hans Dieter Franke"
<netstory@t...> wrote:
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: TONY BERMANSEDER
>   To: tapten@yahoogroups.com ; time-space2@yahoogroups.com
>   Cc: theoretical_physics@yahoogroups.com ;
TheoryOfEverything@yahoogroups.com ; 4DWorldx@yahoogroups.com ;
kiarashniknejad@yahoogroups.com ; npa_dissidents@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:09 AM
>   Subject: [4DWorldx] RE:Proper Time defined!
>
>
>   Dear Tony
>   in the view of the discussion about proper time my oldest
>   question comes up again, is there any constant in physics
>   which is a cardinal number?
>   What about Avogadro's constant?
>
>   Hans Dieter

Good point Hans-Dieter.

There is a cardinality of sorts in the QR derivation of this
constant.
This cardinality is the number 12 as the LIMIT set in the
selfgenerating algorithm of the Fibonacci 'awareness-triplet'
eigenstates.

There is a superstring coefficient series for iterative counter
k. which uses the eigenstate of magnetocharge as inverse vibratory
eigenstate of the t-duality.

How did I know?
Well it sort of is like this 'naming' in your personality theory -
pure invention and yet kind of derived from some abstract void (or
whatever).

Anyway the formulation is:
[7k-(7-n)].Eps^{k-1}.(10/33)=[7(k-1)+n].e*^{1-k}.(10/33)

For k=1 (The Series of Identity is n=1), we have numerators
10,20,30,.. and denominator 33.
For k=2 (The Series of Expansion is n=2), we have numerators
8,9,10,..and denominator 1650.
For k=3 (The Series of Order is n=3), we have numerators 15,16,17,..
and denominator 825000.

And on it goes for a n=10 principality, with n=1 leading to the
identification for the atomic elements for the k-isotope
distribution as percentage generators for natural abundance etc.

Now the n=2 series is what QR terms the triplicity for mass
evolution.

RESTMASS=hRmax/(Lps.c^2)=0.01183463299 then becomes like an atomic
massunit in 12D-F-space and derives fromsuperbrane boundary
conditions attained from the same algorithm.

Using 1 protonucleonic mass units (Mc) for the LIMIT=12 current-
loops in the Unified Field for the first coefficient in the n=2
series then produces Avogadro's Constant as the Amount of SUBSTANCE
or molarity for this RESTMASS algorithmic definition.

(0.01183463299)(20/{33x12Mc}=N/A=6.02242143x10^23 1/mol* as
superbrane definition and indeed very close to the textbook value of
the SI-mensuration system.

The second coefficient relates to the Black Body spectrum for the
Universe as a Temperature Planck-Evolution and the third coefficient
relates to RadiationMass, the coupling between matter and light in
the metaphysics of the 'immortalisation/transcension'scenarios.

The 33 factor is easy if you add up the archetypes from 1-9 for the
non-time dimensions 1,4,7 you get 33 complemented by the 12 again
for the full cardinal set.

                                              Tony B.




 




Love from the DragonHeart!

As a mathematical physicist, I also study ancient scrolls and the signature can be evaluated on a number of levels; from childishly naive to profoundly esoteric---Tony Whynot, Unicorn of SophiaGnosis !

ARMAGEDDON=DRAGONMADE=ANDROMEDAG=MARRY7=GODNAMEDRA=82 =666+1=1+2+3+...34+35+36+1=1+2.2+3.3+5.5+7.7+11.11+13.13+17.17

http://au.msnusers.com/quantumrelativity



Are you right for each other? Find out with our Love Calculator

Mon Apr 4, 2005 7:13 am

sirebard
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #17834 of 29588 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... number? > What about Avogadro's constant? > > Hans Dieter Good point Hans-Dieter. There is a cardinality of sorts in the QR derivation of this constant....
TONY BERMANSEDER
sirebard
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2005
7:14 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help