....

But when you say:

Tony B.: The electron's attraction to the nucleus is a charge attraction.

Here's where the problem starts.

The way I see it, it is all one force.

If your science sees it as four different fundamental forces then your science must be wrong.

Dear Fitz!

You are not reading the information.

The four fundamental forces are a result of symmetry breaking and are indeed unified at the Planck Scale.

There is a 'super force' or 'unified interaction' and this interaction is an energy remnant of the Planck-Energy, which gives you the measurable universe.

The all-unifying resonance state is 3x10^30 Hz as the manifestation of the 'higher superstring' frequencies 'tuning down' from the original inverse Planck-Time of order 10^44 Hz.

Can it be simpler than that?

Your charges are 'quasimasses' and relate to the Laws of Ampere and the concepts of superconductive electricity as 'mass currents'. This is related VERY SIGNIFICANTLY, to the manifestation of the macrocosmos from the microcosm.

Charge and mass are unified via their dimensionless finestructures: Alpha=2Pi.ke^2/hc and G-Alpha=2Pi.Gm^2/hc.

Think of a 'spaghetti' tube with Planck-Cross-sectional area and length from Planck-Length magnified to 10^-22 metres to the size of a supercluster.

There are your 'standing waves' as cosmic strings, yet 2D confined in the superstrings.

My recent post on the Cosmic String-Black Hole connection is truly groundbreaking new physics.

It is sad, that noone on the forums could even glimpse or understand this 'new physics'.

This is something you should put on your other sites for some professionals to ponder, as it is CLEAR and irrefutable evidence and links to the other things we are discussing.

Tony B.

---

From: "Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr" <zeusrdx@...>
Reply-To: TheoryOfEverything@yahoogroups.com
To: TheoryOfEverything@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [TheoryOfEverything] Re: The Speed of Gravity and Origins/z
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:29:15 -0000

Tony B.,

I totally agree with you on the following simple rules:

Tony B.: In a manner of intuition you are quite correct Fitz, but your drawn conclusions lack the depth to actually crystallise the 'simple rules'.

Those 'simple rules' are:

1. Conservation of Symmetry: Geometric-Numerical-Quantum-Micro/Macro.

2. Conservation of Energy: Statistic-kT/Gravitational-hf/Inertial-mc^2.

3. Conservation of Momentum: Quantum/Angular/Linear.

But when you say:

Tony B.: The electron's attraction to the nucleus is a charge attraction.

Here's where the problem starts.

The way I see it, it is all one force.

If your science sees it as four different fundamental forces then your science must be wrong.

I've had the top radio licence for many years.

Some who are retired kept theirs by lying and saying they are still working in radio and hand over  the license fee for 5 more years but I decided not to lie and let mine lapse.

I always wanted to know what charge really was.

I always wanted to know what gravity really was too.

Then in 1966 I saw they were both the same thing and wrote a book about it.

Fitzpatrick's First Book (FREE)

I must have been on the right track because I still have the Letter of approval sent to me by Lincoln Barnett who wrote many general relativity articles for the Encyclopaedia Britannica. He also wrote the best seller "The universe and Dr. Einstein".

Tony, I'm certain that Stephen Wolfram is absolutely right when he says this universe is a simple universe using simple rules.

I'm also certain that Dr. Milo Wolff is right in that the electron is a scalar wave resonance.

I'm certain that Viv Pope is right in that we should not coll these things waves because they are resonances and are not really transverse waves such as water waves.

I'm certain that Van Flandern  is right and Yale and the other major universities teaching astronomy are right about the spped of light being almost instantaneous as Newton said and not at the slower spped of light that Einstein claimed.

Even the Tony Bermanseder's Site is right about the many dimensions of string theory.

But since none of these people previously mentioned will even take it upon them selves to even talk to each other I have delegated the responsibility to myself of trying to fit all the respective parts of each into a true Theory of Everything that folks might understand.

I'm certain of the following:

If your science doesn't unify the forces then it is simply religion that will EVENTUALLY pass into oblivion just as the ancient Egyptian  religion of Amun.

All that will be left is the name only.

Amen