Skip to search.
TheoryOfEverything

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
The Planck-Scale Transformation via the Schwarzschild Metric   Message List  
Reply Message #25959 of 33013 |

Dear Forums!

Here is a breakthrough:   µ=(2fmax.LP)^2/G~mP/G~(mps/lps) for hfmax=hfps=mpsc^2, and

which describes a Hamiltonian for the so called Cosmic Strings and how this relates (and transforms) the superstring

 scale into a experimentally testable 'wormhole' scale of the Kerr-Tubes.

 

Reproduced below is a brief treatise on the Josephson supercurrents leading to the ZPE

currents of the Big Bang initialising superstring parameters.

First so is a reference from Turkey, which shows just QR's formulation for the vacuum

currents in the form of a variable mass in current formula J=emc^2/h.

m is said to be related to the Cosmic Ray energies of the order of EeV (10^18 eV).

Quantum Relativity has for years proclaimed, that this characteristic mass MUST be

specific as the Weyl-Limit of the Big Bang singularity aka the Einstein-Rosen-Bridge or wormhole.

Ergo all cosmic rays and gamma bursters etc. are transformed superstrings.

QR simply uses the maximum frequency or minimum wavelength as fmax=mc^2/h,

so eschewing the mass dependencies altogether  in specifing the limiting current

Jmax=2efmax discussed at length in the reference below.

I'll intersperse brief comments in that reference in {brackets}.

Hence the Kerr-Tube is simply the long sought Cosmic String with cross-section the

Planck-Length, but extended in space to any size up to the scale of the superclusters of

diameter 473 Million lightyears (at cosmological redshift 7.477).

This allows me to state categorically, that Quantum Relativity PREDICTS

the precise energy eigenstate for a Cosmic String to be identical to the

wormhole singularity of ANY Black Hole as spacetime quantum of the

cosmogenesis.

The characteristic mass m will be 2.22..x10^-20 kg or so 1.24x10^4 TeV.

The precise relationship to the Planck-Mass hence transforms the former into 

its magnified form, where the Planck-Length assumes the characteristic

eigenvalue of  lps=10^-22 metres.

Derivation:

(mPlanck/G) is the proportionality constant to (mps/lps) as the Hamiltonian.

So (mPlanck/G).(l.c^2/Ml)=(mps/lps) for some characteristic mass M.

Hence =(mPlanck.c^2/GM*)=(mPlanck/Rs*)=(mps/lps) where Rs*=GM*/c^2 and as

Planck-Length definition lPlanck=GmPlanck/c^2 (via Zero-Point-Oscillator

Emin=hfmax/2).

We so have the identity:  (mPlanck/mps)=(lps/Rs*), where Rs*=(mPlanck/mps)lps.

The Schwarzschild Radius for the Planck-Mass as the Planck-Length so is

magnified to lps in the corresponding mass ratio as the proportionality constant.

 

The Cosmic Strings so magnify the Planck-Length in a factor of  order 10^12 and

render the Planck-Massed Black Hole as so 6.4 tons in Msps=lps.c^2/4pG in

the same order of magnitude and becoming the Schwarzschild metric minimum mass

for Black Holes.

The characteristic mass M* then defines the Hamiltonian l/M in:

M*=Rs*.c^2/G=(mPlanck/mps).c^2.lps/G=(lps/mps)Sqrt(hc^5/2pG^3) and of

order c^2 as suggested in the original approximation mPlanck/G~µ=(2fmax.LP)^2/G.

(In superstring parameter for maximum G=Go=1.11..x10^-10 (Nm^2/kg^2)* the

characteristic mass M*=6.1693824..x10^16 kg* for a Schwarzschild Radius

of Rs*=GM*/c^2=7.6165214..x10^-11 metres*).

The Hamiltonian Constant (lps/mps)=222.22...(m/kg)* precisely.

Multiplying this constant by the factor by (2/p) gives our earlier expression

 µ=(2fmax.LP)^2/G in µ.p/2=(lps/mps)=222.22....

 

As the ZPE is defined in ZPE-Quantum=4p.hfps/lps^3=2.51327..x10^64 (J/m^3)*,

the parameters for the Cosmic Strings discussed become established.

 

 

 
 
 
 
Superconducting Cosmic String That Connected A Charged Black Hole
and Considered as Hair of Black Hole
Ali Riza AKÇAY
Barbaros Mah. Veysipasa Sok. 100.
Yil Sitesi H-Blok No: 17/5, 34662
Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey
Tel: + 90 542 321 66 89
E-mail: akcayar@e-kolay.net
Abstract:
This paper describes that the superconducting cosmic strings can be connected to a charged black
hole and can be considered as the hair of black hole. What the no-hair theorems show is that a large amount of
information is lost when a body collapses to form a black hole. In addition, the no-hair theorem has not been
proved for the Yang-Mills field. This paper proves and claims that the superconducting cosmic strings can be
connected to a charged black hole when the current inside these strings and black holes approaches the critical
value (J->Jc=2p.
emc^2/h).
 
Because, this state is the final state of the gravitational collapse, and the event
horizon would be destroyed in this state. Therefore, these strings should be considered as hair of the charged
black holes and may be titled as BHCS (black hole connected strings). This means that at least the charged black
holes have the hair. Thus, the no-hair theorem is not applicable for the charged black holes in the state of the
critical current (J~Jc).
 
 
1. BACKGROUND
John Wheeler, who invented most of the terminology concerning black holes, remarked in the
1960s that ”black holes have no hair‘ [1]. The no-hair theorem proved by the combined work
of Hawking, Israel, Carter and Robinson shows that the only stationary black holes in the
absence of matter fields are the Kerr solutions. The no-hair theorem was extended by
Robinson to the case where there was an electromagnetic field. This added a third parameter
Q, the electric charge. The no-hair theorem has not been proved for the Yang-Mills field [2].
H. Reissner in 1916, and independently G. Nordström in 1918, discovered an exact solution to
Einstein‘s equations for the gravitational field caused by an electrically charged mass. This
solution is a generalized version of Schwarzschild‘s solution, with one other parameter: the
electric charge. It describes space-time outside the event horizon of an electrically charged
black hole. There is a limit to the amount of electric charge a black hole may have. Above a
critical limit (J>Jc=2p.emc^2/h)
 the event horizon would be destroyed by the colossal force
of electrostatic repulsion. The maximum electric force is proportional to the mass of black
hole. Nevertheless, a black hole is just as likely to be positively charged as negatively charged
[1].
The idea that strings could become superconducting was first suggested in a pioneering paper
by Witten (1985a). Later it was realized that the role of the superconducting condensate could
be played not only by a scalar field, but also by a vector field whose flux is trapped inside a
non-abelian string (Preskill, 1985; Everett, 1988). If the vector field is charged, the gauge
invariance is again spontaneously broken inside the string. Witten also proposed another
mechanism for string superconductivity, which operates in models where some fermions
acquire their masses from a Yukawa coupling to the Higgs field of the string [3]. Witten has
shown that strings predicted in some grand unified models behave as superconducting wires.
Such strings moving through magnetized cosmic plasmas can develop large currents and can
give rise to a variety of astrophysical effects [4].
The particles move along the string at the speed of light. The resulting current is (J=enc), and
dJ/dt is given by dJ/dt=(2pce^2/h)E.
 
The current continues to grow until it reaches a critical value Jc=2p.emc^2/h, when pF=mc.
 
 
At this point particles at the Fermi level have sufficient energy to leave the string. Consequently, in this simplified picture, the growth of the
current terminates at Jc  and the string starts producing particles at the rate n=2p.eE/h.
 
{Tony B.: The momentum pF=mc describes of course the transition from de Broglie group speed (v) to the Compton lightspeed.
 
All superluminal phenomena engage the de Broglie Phase speed VdB=lf=(h/mv).(mc^2/h)=c^2/v>c for all v<c.
 
 Note here that J=enc reproduces the Josephson coefficient in QR's cosmic wavefunction
in 2e/hA=e*=1/hfmax.
eE/h has units ChargexEnergy/Action=ChargexFrequency=Current, which rewrites 2e/h=A/E=Current/Energy
Ergo the described 'particle production' is where the enigmatic cosmic rays come from}.
 
 
The fermion mass m is model-dependent, but it does not exceed the symmetry breaking scale   l-dependent, but it does not exceed the symmetry breaking scale of the string
the string, h.
 
Hence, Jc <=Jmax   ~   e(2p µc^3/h)^1/2 ,  where we have used the relation µ=2p.h^2c/h [3].
 
{Tony B.: Now µ has units (the Hamiltonian) mass/wavelength to give the current
and this mass per unitlength of course defines the energy scale of the cosmic string.
 So substitute 2p µc^3/h=(2efmax)^2/e^2=4fmax^2 and solve for µ=4hfmax^/2p.c^3.
 
Now the Planck-Length LP^2=hG/2p.c^3  and so  µ=(2fmax.LP)^2/G with the required
units of mass/velocity in v^2/G.
 
NOW THIS IS THE FUNDAMENTAL NEW PHYSICS!
 
The physical Weyl-Maximum as frequency creates a PHASECHANGE in the COSMIC STRING
in using a de Broglie phase to transform the ordinary lightspeed c=lf into a DIRECT SCALING
TRANSMUTATION of the Planck-Length of the Superstrings DOWN to the physical Weyl-geodesic
 aka the Kerr-Torus.
 
µ=(2fmax.LP)^2/G~Planck-Mass/G~141.471 kg/metre.
 
Hence the NEW PHYSICS of the heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8) will show that the Cosmic String,
as well as the wormhole bridge (which connects oppositely charged Black Holes as Black Hole- White Hole
dyads btw) carries a superconductive current density of mP/G and of so 1415 grams per centimetre.
 
Of course we now also know, that Jmax=9.64x10^11 Amperes and that the string scale h must
be h^2=µh/2p.c~5x10^-41 for a  h~7x10^-21 kg and of course the QR prediction is that
the characteristic mass on theoretical grounds must be 2.22x10^-20 kg for
selfconsistency of parameters in Quantum Relativity.
The difference is of course simply p.}
 
The superconducting current in the strings is carried by charged particles which acquire a
mass M at the string-forming phase transition but remain massless inside the strings. These
massless charge carriers move along the strings at the speed of light. The string current is
bounded by a critical value, Jc~ eM, at which the characteristic energy of the charge
carriers become comparable to M , so that they have enough energy to jump out of the string.
The mass M is model-dependent but is limited by the string symmetry breaking scale h,M<=h [4].
 
2. Superconducting Cosmic Strings that Connected an Electrically Charged Black Hole
Considering the above background information the following highlights may be pointed out:
- It is quite clear that the no-hair theorem has not been completely proved yet since, it
has not been proved for the Yang-Mills field and for the electrically charged black
hole that have reached to critical current value (Jc).
 
- The growth of the current inside the superconducting cosmic string terminates at Jc
(critical current value) and the string starts producing particles.
 
- There is a limit to the amount of electric charge a black hole may have. Above a
critical limit (J>Jc=2p.emc^2/h) the event horizon would be destroyed by the colossal
force of electrostatic repulsion.
 
- An electrically charged black hole is just as likely to be positively charged as
negatively charged.
 
- The state (J>=Jc ) of the electrically charged black hole may be considered as the
final state of a gravitational collapse within an horizon. This means that the
gravitational collapse would be destroyed in this state.
 
Considering the above highlights I cannot see any problem and difficulty on the connection
between the superconducting cosmic strings and an electrically charged black hole in the state
of (J>=Jc ).
 
 In addition I claim that a superconducting cosmic strings can provides the
connection between two electrically charged black holes (one positively charged other
negatively charged) in the same state.
Now, we can say that the superconducting cosmic strings can be connected to an electrically
charged black hole, and these strings should be considered as hair of black holes. Thus, the
no-hair theorem is not applicable for the electrically charged black holes.
 
3. CONCLUSION
As a conclusion, this paper described that the superconducting cosmic strings can be
connected to an electrically charged black hole in the state of (J>=J
c), and these strings
should be considered as hair of the black holes. Thus, the no-hair theorem is not applicable for
the electrically charged black holes.
 
4. REFERENCES
[1]. J-P Luminet, Black Holes (Cambridge University Press 1995)
[2]. S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The Nature of Space and Time (Princeton University
Press 1996).
[3]. A. Vilenkin and E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects
(Cambridge University Press 1994).
[4]. J.R.S. Nascimento, Inyong Cho and Alexander Vilenkin, Charged Vacuum
Condensate Near A Superconducting Cosmic String (August 29, 2002).
 

Tony B.: Spacetime is manufactured in the quantization of the Kerr-Torus or wormhole propagating in a higher dimensional sense.

The Hubble-Diameter defines a 'Steady State' Universe as asymptotic boundary for the mass parameters in Standing Waves of Oscillation.

Their phase differences indeed lead to the displacement currents  and the formulations of spacetime coordinates in modern physics.

The elementary form is the Josephson Waveform 2e/h=Supercurrent/Energy, with quantisation of Voltage and Resistance via the Action Law of the Planck Constant.

As Voltage V=(h/4Pi.e).d(Phase)/dt (partial derivative) and the Phase=2Pi.ft=wt for angular velocity w; the time-derivative of the Phase is of course 2Pi.f for V=hf/2e.

Hence, as Voltage=Energy/Charge=Action/SuperCurrent=hf/2e, and as the mimimised Voltage of the Planck-Oscillator of the Zero-Point-Energy.

So Vmin=Emin/Ne, which is then quantised in integer N for charge Q=2Ne and the SuperCurrent 2ef=Amin =2eEmin/h=2efmax=2ec/10^-22 of the Kerr-Torus.

The SuperCurrent quantum Amin=9.638..x10^11 Amperes so describes the ZPE in superconductive terms of the sourcesink  Vortex-Potential-Energy-Quantum=EZPE=hfmax/10^-66=2.513..x10^64 Joules/m^3 and as the inherent ZPE of the vacuum.

It should be noted that the cosmic wavefunction defines a squared current constant A^2=14x15^24 for A=4.8546...x10^14 dimensionless and as a constant almost on a par with h and c^2.

The VPE quantum Emax=1/500 Joules or so 1.24x10^7 GeV with the ratio Amin/Emax=2e/h for the generalisation 2e/hA=1/E and as the coefficient of the universal gaussian wave function B(n)=(2e/hA).exp{-Alpha.n(n+1)}.

The fundamental constant A then approximates as A~Amin.e*, with e* the magnetocharge being defined as inverse energy quantum e*=1/hfmax and also maps the electron radius in a finestructure of h=10^-22/e*c=10^-22/2Re.c^3 in superstring parameters.



Tony B.



Love from the DragonHeart!

As a mathematical physicist, I also study ancient scrolls and the signature can be evaluated on a number of levels; from childishly naive to profoundly esoteric---Tony Whynot, Unicorn of SophiaGnosis !

ARMAGEDDON=DRAGONMADE=ANDROMEDAG=MARRY7=GODNAMEDRA=82 =666+1=1+2+3+...34+35+36+1=1+2.2+3.3+5.5+7.7+11.11+13.13+17.17

http://au.msnusers.com/quantumrelativity



Advertisement: Fresh jobs daily. Stop waiting for the newspaper. Search now! www.seek.com.au

Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:51 pm

sirebard
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Message #25959 of 33013 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Dear Forums! Here is a breakthrough: µ=(2f max .L P )^ 2 /G~m P /G~( m ps / l ps ) for hf max =hf ps =m ps c^2, and which describes a Hamiltonian for the so...
Tony Bermanseder
sirebard Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2007
4:53 pm

Tony B. I sent your post on this to Dr. Milo Wolff in the following e-mail: Milo, Mathematical physicist Anthony Bermanseder found this: ...
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick...
zeusrdx Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2007
7:43 pm

... <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheoryOfEverything/message/25959> ... and ... Dear Zeus! Yes, thank you and well done. I knew you would like the...
Tony Bermanseder
sirebard Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2007
11:01 pm

Tony Bermanseder, OK. Now let me ask you this question: Let's suppose the quark is at a much higher scalar resonance ( standing wave) frequency from the...
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick...
zeusrdx Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2007
12:10 am

Tony Bermanseder, OK. Now let me ask you this question: Let's suppose the quark is at a much higher scalar resonance ( standing wave) frequency from the...
Tony Bermanseder
sirebard Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2007
2:39 am

Tony, I posted the first installment of the Hypergeometrical Hyperon Family in my Blog. http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com I will be blogging the...
MP
ny2292000 Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2007
4:01 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help