On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 08:28 AM, Zeus wrote:
>The future super-computers that Stephen Wolfram predicts will tell us
>about our universe will be programed with Milo Wolff's frequency math.
>This "New Kind of Science" will be a WSM (Wave Structure of Matter)
>science
>
>Milo WoLFF wrote
> >>It is very nice of you to compliment me and the WSM. However > your > readers will learn more about it if you concentrate on the > principle > feature i.e. an inward spherical wave and an outward > spherical wave. > The apparent particle is the wave center. That is largely the whole > simple picture. In actuality there are no spinning tops. because the > wave structure has spherical symmetry. Your "spinning top rule" does > indeed work in the large human scale lab but it is misleading > concerning the basic wave structure at the quantum-sized scale. <<
>
> An inward and outward spherical wave building not only the electron > but every particle is essential.
>
> Zeuss I agree with you that the electron wave structure has spherical > symmetry. >Milo Wolff
I am glad that you agree. But just aside, it is not me you must agree with but with Nature who has made the rules: Principle I - the wave equation of the space medium.
Principle II - Rule of the Density of the medium.
These two Principles determine everything and there is no speculation allowed on my part ( or your's or anybody's)
>
> Zeuss You were the first to prove exactly how it was built.
Milo Wolff
My curiosity made me stumble on it. Since the wave equation has only two solutions (the electron-positron) in free space, I could hardly miss. The rest was obvious because the wave properties agreed with all the measured natural laws and disagreed with nothing that had an experimental basis.
> >Zeuss
> But you also know how important the surroundings are to maintain this > spherical symmetry.
Milo Wolff
Right. The surroundings are 'space'. We don't see it, we don't feel it. But it is there as the raw material of the matter of the universe. But space is not completely uniform - near massive objects like stars space has a tiny increase of density. As a result, the spherical waves are slightly elliptical - so light rays bend slightly and gravity occurs. All these effects are very, very tiny which is the reason that gravity forces are 10(-40) of the electron force. So you can see how tiny variations in space are..
To really appreciate and understand 'space' you must study (take about 3 minutes) Nature's Principle II. Then you will know yourself, quickly, simply.
>
However, calculation shows that at the center of the electron waves, such as in a proton or anti-proton, space is very much more dense than elsewhere. This is due to the presence of the central waves. So a spherical wave like the electron is no longer the rule.
Central waves are the basis of the heavy particles (hadrons). Nuclear waves can be all sorts of (closed) shapes - ellitical, spheroidal, etc.
> Zeuss We have a universe of multi-frequency resonances.
Wolff
The big picture is that 99.99% of space is filled with the positron/electron waves; All are of the same frequency, and it is the electron/positron waves which form our conception of the universe, the natural laws, and what we observe. Only the nuclei have high frequencies and those waves are closed structures - not going out into space in general. But nuclear properties determine the shapes of the waves of the electrons formed around them that form our picture of matter. Zeus
> But are the surroundings going to stay exactly homogeneous and > isotropic so as to maintain this perfect spherical symmetry as "seen" > by these other entities at their other scalar frequencies?
Wolff
Nothing is exact or perfect except pure numbers. In the real universe: Space density varies a tiny amount around every star; typically 1 part in 10^40 which is also the ratio of electric force/gravity force.
> >Zeuss
> I think the slight varying of the surroundings - as things orbit or > change orbits - adds a bit more to your
> Milo Wolff (You''ve got it right. Nature's space is not exact.)
> picture of exact spherical symmetry as seen by these other frequency > entities.
Yes your guess is close. Space density varies a tiny bit everywhere. But the small variation is usually smaller than we can easily measure. This accounts for the popular perception that the speed of light is constant which in fact depends on the density of space in which it travels.
>
> But I'll agree with you that this spherical symmetry and
> >Zeuss
> WSM is extremely important because we'd have no universe without it.
Wolff
That's a full statement! Couldn't we get along without it? (joke)
> >Zeuss
> When I see 99.9999% empty space both in the microcosm as well as in > the macrocosm, then I have to look for some similar rules in both for > this behavior.
Wolff
You missed on this,Zeus, Why don't you study Principle I and Principle II carefully. Then you will know the whole enchilada and not have to guess anymore - even though your guessing is rather good.
>
> Space is the central important concept of the universe and is its > entire substance even though we hardly notice its presence all around > us: Space is not 'empty' It is 100% there. Just the opposite: > 'Emptiness' is the non-concept.
> Zeuss That's what I'm trying to find.
Milo Wolff
You've got it all around you. Principle I and II will tell you everything. Then you will gain the awesome sense of understanding the universe in a grain of sand.
Once again, I attach a new paper describing a search for understanding by WHEELER AND FEYNMAN and how close they came to the real structure of the electron which is so simple that a few paragraphs describes it and the immense consequences for the universe. Work on this and then go to Principle I and II to polish it all off.
Tell me your conclusions.
You also would gain an enormous understanding to watch the real structure of the waves of the electron in a program called ATOM IN A BOX made by Prof Dean Dauger (still a kid!) of UCLA. To see it, go to GOOGLE.COM and search for ATOM IN A BOX. If you get the right program, you will be able to click/choose the energy and momentum levels of the H atom and see what they look like. The lowest ordinary energy level is very simple, just spherical waves like most in the universe. The highest levels are very complex but fascinating. You will immediately see how similar they are to the waves in various musical instruments.
My best to you, Milo
Attachment |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Attachment |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 
Offline 
Send Email