Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
UncensoredTakGroup · Discussion group for Takahashi owners and fans
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
FSQ & MonsterMOAG OAG   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #44706 of 52138 |
I use a FSQ-106N and a SBIG STL-11K/FW-8 combo. Before I added
the FW-8, my images had nice round stars out to the corners of the
image. When I added the FW-8, I started getting elongation in my stars
on one side of the chip. This said to me that I probably now had a tilt
in the camera. However, when I rotated the camera (I also have a
Astrodon Takometer), the elongation got worse in certain PAs and better
in others. After much testing, I came to the conclusion that the
additional weight of the FW-8, plus the fact that the weight is offset
to the main optical path, was causing flex/sag in my optical train. I
started investigating where the flex/sag/elongation could be happening
and determined that there are 3 basic places this is most likely to
happen, 1. the focuser, 2. the CAA, 3. the guidescope. I addressed each
one and found "play, slop, looseness", in the focuser and CAA, and
eliminated the guidescope by installing an Astrodon MonsterMOAG. I now
have the imaging chip back square to the optical plane in all PAs and
the flex/sag is gone. I now guide with the MonsterMOAG (MMOAG) and
don't have to worry about flexure or focusing of the guidescope. The
addition of the MMOAG makes a very tight. compact, rigid imaging train
from the CAA to the main chip.

I put together a Word document that describes the adjustments I
made, and how I installed the MonsterMOAG on my FSQ. It is available
for download on my website here:

http://www.skyimager.com/FSQ-MMOAG/. The document is called
"Using an Astrodon MonsterMOAG with a Tak FSQ-106N".

Also, here is a link to the first image I took after these
modifications. It is a Ha image with the individual exposures (16 of
them, 30 min each), guided with the MMOAG.

http://www.skyimager.com/imagedata/IC405-IC410_12-18-07.html

If you are seeing any issues in your images similar to what I
did, this might be of some help. The MMOAG is an excellent alternative
to a separate guidescope.





Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:33 pm

startestor
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #44706 of 52138 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I use a FSQ-106N and a SBIG STL-11K/FW-8 combo. Before I added the FW-8, my images had nice round stars out to the corners of the image. When I added the FW-8,...
Frank S Barnes III
startestor
Offline Send Email
Dec 23, 2007
7:33 pm

Frank, nice write up. In some of the photos on your website, I notice that you positioned your FSQ on the rings so that the Robofocus is on top. Does that...
sc02492
Offline Send Email
Dec 23, 2007
8:06 pm

That's a very helpful writeup. I had, as many of you know, a terrible time with the FSQ-ED(X) (New Q) and that same camera/FW combination. The STL 8-place...
ancient.sull
Offline Send Email
Dec 24, 2007
2:48 am

Hi Steve, I have a set of custom made rings from Andy Homeyer to hold my FSQ. They attach to a set of Losmandy Dovetail plate adapter (DA). They are pretty low...
Frank S Barnes III
startestor
Offline Send Email
Dec 24, 2007
5:06 pm

Thanks, Frank. I have already been down this road with my FSQ- tightened the CAA as well as the focuser tube (those 4 screws on top). The CAA is great, but I...
sc02492
Offline Send Email
Dec 24, 2007
5:26 pm

Frank: nice document describing the use of the MMOAG with the FSQ. Quick question; I also use the FSQ with the CAA attached (EDX version). I do use the...
r1300rs
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2008
4:54 pm

Nice document. I'm also a new "Q" EDX user with the CAA attached. I also use Robo and noticed that your stepsize must be different than mine. Would you mind...
r1300rs
Offline Send Email
Dec 25, 2007
2:26 pm

Hi Rick, I use a Micropause = 4, and a Stepsize = 1. When I calibrate my Robo, I get a Max. Travel of 10254. I have found that the value of 4 for Micropause...
Frank S Barnes III
startestor
Offline Send Email
Dec 26, 2007
2:05 pm

Frank: The info is much appreciated; I hadn't considered the Micropause inspite of asking the company directly. It certainly makes sense and I will give it a...
r1300rs
Offline Send Email
Dec 27, 2007
2:58 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help