Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
WS-RM-Workshops · WS-RM-Workshops Discussions
  • Members Only
  • Post
  • Files
  • Photos
  • Links
  • Database
  • Polls
  • Members
  • Calendar
  • Promote
  • Groups Labs (Beta)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

   Messages Help
Message #
Search:
Advanced
Messages 50 - 83 of 119   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#83 From: "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@...>
Date: Thu Apr 7, 2005 1:03 am
Subject: RE: [WS-Security-Workshops] Proposed updates to SC+RM scenarios document 		kirillg_public
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Folks, haven’t heard much feedback from participants – is everyone ok with making these changes?

 

thanks

 

From: Kirill Gavrylyuk [mailto:kirillg@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:52 PM
To: WS-Security-Workshops@yahoogroups.com; WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WS-Security-Workshops] Proposed updates to SC+RM scenarios document

 

Based on the comments received so far on the document, we propose the following updates to the SC+RM scenarios. What do folks think?

 

  1. Ordering elements inside Security header. An issue was raised around scenarios text prescribing specific elements order inside Security header, for example requiring Timestamp to be the first element. We believe the best way to proceed is to remove any ordering requirements text from the scenarios doc – follow what WS-Security and BSP prescribes.

 

  1. SignatureConfirmation. We introduced SignatureConfirmation on the secure session initiation (RST/RSTR handshake). Given that this is a protection mechanism applicable to the entire message exchange, it would make sense to use it on all messages.

 

  1. Encrypted Signature. Scenarios document currently prescribes encrypting signatures on RST/RSTR and app messages, but not WS-RM infrastructure messages. Similar to #2, given that encrypting signature is a protection mechanism that is applicable to the entire exchange, it would make sense to either do it for all messages or not do it for any.

 

Attached is the scenarios document with the proposed changes applied, marked with change bars. thanks

 

 

 


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#82 From: "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 11:44 pm
Subject: RE: SAP's RM Workshop participation in April without SC/T 		kirillg_public
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Steve,

 

We agree with Doug - testing on secure RM is the core objective of the workshop, but we are ok with testing unsecure RM scenarios provided it does not detract from that core testing.

 

In our experience, testing the baseline (non-secure) RM scenarios is a useful initial step in debugging and testing secure RM scenarios anyway, and as Doug mentions we will almost certainly have spare time.

 

Microsoft already has both secure and non-secure RM endpoints available for online testing, and we will be bringing the same code to the workshop meeting too.

 

thanks

 

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@...]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 11:31 AM
To: WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [WS-RM-Workshops] SAP's RM Workshop participation in April without SC/T

 


Steve,
  Its ok with us if we use the gathering to do additional RM interop testing but we should do that only after the objectives of the workshop have been met - which means focusing on the composibility of SC/T and RM first.  If previous events are any indication we should have plenty of time for additional fun afterwards.  In the meantime, several participants are already hosting endpoints that are available for test now - people could leverage those before, during and after the event too.
thanks,
-Doug


"Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@...>

04/05/2005 11:42 AM

Please respond to
WS-RM-Workshops

To

<WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com>

cc

 

Subject

[WS-RM-Workshops] SAP's RM Workshop participation in April without SC/T

 

 

 



Hi All,

SAP is working very hard to prepare for the interoperability workshop in April.  However, due to several internal dependencies on timelines, it looks like we will not be able to have implementations of SecureConversation/Trust by the time of the workshop.   Since the focus of this workshop is on the composability of these specifications, we would like to check with the greater group as to whether others would be interested in testing non-secure RM scenarios at the workshop as well.  This could be used as an opportunity for those who were not able to attend the previous workshops to play catchup.  Additionally, If we were to do this before the secure scenarios, it may help in debugging interop failures (if it works without security but doesn’t work with security, it could narrow the scope of the problem).

How do people feel about this?

Cheers,
Steve

---------------------
Steve Winkler
SAP

 

Yahoo! Groups Links

 


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#81 From: Doug Davis <dug@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 9:16 pm
Subject: Re: Certificates to use 		dugibm
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 

Sounds ok to me.  I've updated our site to use those.
-Dug



"Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@...>

04/05/2005 04:06 PM

Please respond to
WS-RM-Workshops
To
<WS-Security-Workshops@yahoogroups.com>, <WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com>
cc
Subject
[WS-RM-Workshops] Certificates to use





What do people think about using the certificates pair from the OASIS X509 interop demo (Alice and Bob) that Jan has this morning for all clients and services?
 
It would simplify client testing if we can agree on a single cert pair…
 
Thanks!


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#80 From: "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 8:06 pm
Subject: Certificates to use 		kirillg_public
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

What do people think about using the certificates pair from the OASIS X509 interop demo (Alice and Bob) that Jan has this morning for all clients and services?

 

It would simplify client testing if we can agree on a single cert pair…

 

Thanks!


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#79 From: "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 7:51 pm
Subject: Proposed updates to SC+RM scenarios document 		kirillg_public
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Based on the comments received so far on the document, we propose the following updates to the SC+RM scenarios. What do folks think?

 

  1. Ordering elements inside Security header. An issue was raised around scenarios text prescribing specific elements order inside Security header, for example requiring Timestamp to be the first element. We believe the best way to proceed is to remove any ordering requirements text from the scenarios doc – follow what WS-Security and BSP prescribes.

 

  1. SignatureConfirmation. We introduced SignatureConfirmation on the secure session initiation (RST/RSTR handshake). Given that this is a protection mechanism applicable to the entire message exchange, it would make sense to use it on all messages.

 

  1. Encrypted Signature. Scenarios document currently prescribes encrypting signatures on RST/RSTR and app messages, but not WS-RM infrastructure messages. Similar to #2, given that encrypting signature is a protection mechanism that is applicable to the entire exchange, it would make sense to either do it for all messages or not do it for any.

 

Attached is the scenarios document with the proposed changes applied, marked with change bars. thanks

 

 


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#78 From: Doug Davis <dug@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 6:30 pm
Subject: Re: SAP's RM Workshop participation in April without SC/T 		dugibm
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 

Steve,
  Its ok with us if we use the gathering to do additional RM interop testing but we should do that only after the objectives of the workshop have been met - which means focusing on the composibility of SC/T and RM first.  If previous events are any indication we should have plenty of time for additional fun afterwards.  In the meantime, several participants are already hosting endpoints that are available for test now - people could leverage those before, during and after the event too.
thanks,
-Doug



"Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@...>

04/05/2005 11:42 AM

Please respond to
WS-RM-Workshops
To
<WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com>
cc
Subject
[WS-RM-Workshops] SAP's RM Workshop participation in April without SC/T





Hi All,

SAP is working very hard to prepare for the interoperability workshop in April.  However, due to several internal dependencies on timelines, it looks like we will not be able to have implementations of SecureConversation/Trust by the time of the workshop.   Since the focus of this workshop is on the composability of these specifications, we would like to check with the greater group as to whether others would be interested in testing non-secure RM scenarios at the workshop as well.  This could be used as an opportunity for those who were not able to attend the previous workshops to play catchup.  Additionally, If we were to do this before the secure scenarios, it may help in debugging interop failures (if it works without security but doesn’t work with security, it could narrow the scope of the problem).

How do people feel about this?

Cheers,
Steve

---------------------
Steve Winkler
SAP


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#77 From: "Winkler, Steve" <steve.winkler@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 3:42 pm
Subject: SAP's RM Workshop participation in April without SC/T 		stv_wnklr
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi All,

SAP is working very hard to prepare for the interoperability workshop in April.  However, due to several internal dependencies on timelines, it looks like we will not be able to have implementations of SecureConversation/Trust by the time of the workshop.   Since the focus of this workshop is on the composability of these specifications, we would like to check with the greater group as to whether others would be interested in testing non-secure RM scenarios at the workshop as well.  This could be used as an opportunity for those who were not able to attend the previous workshops to play catchup.  Additionally, If we were to do this before the secure scenarios, it may help in debugging interop failures (if it works without security but doesn’t work with security, it could narrow the scope of the problem).

How do people feel about this?

Cheers,
Steve

---------------------
Steve Winkler
SAP


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#75 From: "Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@...>
Date: Tue Apr 5, 2005 3:55 am
Subject: Port numbers for RM+SC Interop Workshop 		jthelin_micr...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

The guys from the Apache project in Sri Lanka will not be able to join us in person for the RM Interop Workshop due to visa complexities, but they would like to join in virtually.

 

In order to facilitate this type of remote testing, I need to make sure the network connections are set up correctly with the necessary ports open. The connections will be internet-accessible (no NAT), but behind a firewall.

 

Please let me know which port numbers your implementation will use, so we can get the maximum amount of cross-testing done.
The list I have so far is:

 

80

8000

8080

9080

50000

 

Thanks,

 

 


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#74 From: "Kirill Gavrylyuk" <kirillg@...>
Date: Fri Apr 1, 2005 3:57 pm
Subject: Microsoft WS-RM+SC Endpoints 		kirillg_public
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Microsoft RM+SC endpoint is up at

 

http://131.107.153.195/SecureReliableMessaging/SecureReliableOneWayDual.svc

 

We also deployed unsecure WS-RM endpoints following the latest spec - to simplify RM-specific interop debugging

 

One-Way:         http://131.107.153.195/SecureReliableMessaging/ReliableOneWayDual.svc  

Request-Reply: http://131.107.153.195/SecureReliableMessaging/ReliableRequestReplyDual.svc  

 

Let me and Ondrej (onhrebic@... ) know if there are any problems/questions.

 

Test clients should be available shortly. thanks


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#73 From: Doug Davis <dug@...>
Date: Fri Apr 1, 2005 3:06 pm
Subject: WS-RM/SC-T interop endpoint 		dugibm
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
 

All,
  in preparation for the upcoming RM+SC/T composibility workshop I've updated our RM endpoint to include the option of asking for the messages to be secured using a secure conversation.  If you want it to use your endpoint I've also included some links to some keys and certs that you can download and use - they appear when you choose the "Use SecConv" option.  As always, please let me know if things don't behave as they should.  The web site is still at:  http://wsi.alphaworks.ibm.com:8080/wsrm
thanks
-Doug

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#71 From: "Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@...>
Date: Tue Mar 1, 2005 8:12 am
Subject: WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-SecureConversation Composability Interop Workshop Invitation - 13-14 April 2005 		jthelin_micr...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-SecureConversation Composability Interop Workshop Invitation

 

BEA Systems Inc, International Business Machines, Microsoft Corporation and TIBCO Software Inc., co-developers of the WS-ReliableMessaging specification, are hosting a 2-day Composability Interop Workshop on April 13 and 14, 2005 at Microsoft's Silicon Valley Campus in Mountain View, CA from 9:30am to 5pm with breakfast available from 8:30am.

 

To attend this event, the attached feedback agreement MUST be reviewed and signed by each attendee - either before or at the workshop event. The purpose of the feedback agreement is to ensure that everyone involved in influencing the specifications is committed to keeping the specification royalty free. Also, as this is an Interop Workshop, participants will need to bring an implementation based on the specifications below.

 

The 2-day interop workshop is an ad-hoc, open forum for companies who have WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-SecureConversation implementations, and who want to test their implementations with other companies' implementations. Attendees bring their own laptops, their implementations and any other tools they feel would be needed; testing among all attendees will occur throughout the day.  A scenario document for use in the Interop Workshop is provided in the attached invitation pack. 

 

As with previous WS-* workshops, these events are open to anyone who desires to participate and who can bring an implementation based on the specifications listed above.

 

Feel free to pass this invitation along, either within your company or elsewhere. This is an open forum. No invitation is required, but an RSVP is appreciated by the event hosts to facilitate accurate logistics planning.

 

If you are interested in participating, please reply to Jorgen Thelin, jthelin@....

 

A signed feedback agreement must be faxed to Jorgen Thelin, fax 1-425-708-0533.

 

Thank you and we look forward to your participation.

 

BEA Systems, IBM, Microsoft and TIBCO

 


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#70 From: "dugibm" <dug@...>
Date: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:52 pm
Subject: Test 		dugibm
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
  
Testing

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#69 From: "Dan House, IBM" <dhouse@...>
Date: Wed Dec 1, 2004 1:29 pm
Subject: Rescheduled WSTX interop workshop 		dhouse1570
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
We received feedback that attendees would prefer January instead of
December for this event, so we are rescheduling it. We now plan to
hold it January 18-19, 2005, instead of December this year.

The previously uploaded zip file with the invitation, feedback
agreement, and scenarios is still there -- everything in that zip is
still correct except the workshop date.

Sorry to change plans on you if you were planning to attend in
December and hadn't yet let me know. Everyone who contacted me about
attending is OK with the change (or they are unable to make both
December and January).

Regards,
Dan House
IBM

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#67 From: "Dan House, IBM" <dhouse@...>
Date: Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:47 pm
Subject: WS-TX Interop Workshop Invitation 		dhouse1570
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
A zip file was just uploaded containing an invitation to an Interop
Workshop for the WS-Coordination, WS-AtomicTransaction, WS-
BusinessActivity specifications. The workshop will be held Dec. 14-
15, 2004 in Research Triangle Park, NC. It will be hosted by IBM on
behalf of the authoring companies: BEA Systems, IBM, and Microsoft.

Also in the zip file are test scenarios and a feedback agreement.
All participants must sign a feedback agreement.

We hope to see you there!

Dan House
IBM

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#65 From: John Feller <fellerj@...>
Date: Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:18 pm
Subject: WS-SecureConversation / WS-Trust Interop Workshop – October 5-6, 2004 		fellerja
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

WS-RM authors:

        Several of you might be interested in participating in the WS-SecureConversation and WS-Trust Interop event in October.  Attached is information with the event details.


WS-SecureConversation / WS-Trust Interop Workshop – October 5-6, 2004


The authors of the WS-SecureConversation and WS-Trust specifications are hosting a 2-day Interop Workshop on Tuesday October 5th and Wednesday October 6th 2004 from 9am to 5pm with breakfast available from 8:30am.

Note that in order to attend this event, the attached feedback agreement MUST be reviewed and signed by each attendee - either before or at the workshop event. The purpose of the feedback agreement is to ensure that everyone involved in influencing the specifications is committed to keeping the specification royalty free. Also, as this is an Interop Workshop, participants will need to bring an implementation based on the specifications below.

The interop workshop is an ad-hoc, open forum for companies who have WS-SecureConversation and WS-Trust implementations based on the WS-SecureConversation and WS-Trust specifications published in May 2004, and who want to test their implementations with other companies’ implementations.

Attendees bring their own laptops, their implementations and any other tools they feel would be needed; testing among all attendees will occur throughout the day.  A scenario document will be provided to attendees of the Interop Workshop before the event, and progress of interoperating implementations will be tracked throughout the event.

This workshop will be held at the University of Texas Commons Center in Austin, TX, see below for location details.
For more up-to-date information on the location please visit one of the following sites:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/webservices/community/workshops/
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/offers/WS-Specworkshops/

An internet connection will be made available during the workshops.
Breakfast, lunch, and afternoon snacks will be served, but participants will be responsible for their own dinner arrangements. Please make any special dietary requirements known in advance, and every effort will be made to accommodate them.

As with previous workshops, these events are open to anyone who desires to participate and who can bring an implementation based on the specifications listed above.

If you are interested in participating, please reply to fellerj@...
A signed feedback agreement will also need to be faxed to John Feller at +1-919-486-0574.

Feel free to pass this invitation along, either in your company or elsewhere.  This is an open forum.  No invitation is required, but an RSVP on or before 9/23/04 is appreciated by the event hosts to facilitate accurate logistics planning. The list of attendees and general workshop results will be made public after the workshops.

Thank you and we look forward to your participation.
BEA Systems, Inc., Computer Associates International, Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Layer 7 Technologies, Microsoft Corporation, Netegrity, Inc., Oblix Inc., OpenNetwork Technologies Inc., Ping Identity Corporation, Reactivity, Inc., RSA Security Inc., VeriSign Inc., and Westbridge Technology, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Workshop Location Details

October 5-6, 2004 (WS-SecureConversation/WS-Trust Interop Workshop)

University of Texas Commons Center

MCC Building (Hill Country Room 3.1004)

3925 West Braker Lane

Austin, TX  78759

UT Commons Center Phone: (512) 471-5898

For Maps, Area Hotels, and additional attendee information visit - http://www.utexas.edu/facilities/commons/attendees.html

Nearest Airport: Austin, TX  (AUS)

-----------------------------------

Attached to this note: WS-SC/Trust Scenario document



Attached to this note: Feedback agreement


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#64 From: "David Langworthy" <dlan@...>
Date: Tue Jun 8, 2004 8:32 pm
Subject: RE: WS-RM:SPEC:Minor typos? 		davidlangworthy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Thanks,

 

I've logged this issue.

 

Dave

 

From: gardeap [mailto:gardeap@...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:09 AM
To: WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WS-RM-Workshops] WS-RM:SPEC:Minor typos?

 

http://Business456.com/guid/0baaf88d-483b-4ecf-a6d8-a7c2eb546817
shows up as a duplicate wsa:MessageID for the following
messages: "Create Sequence", "Message 3" and "Terminate Sequence"
and the retransmission of "Message 2" using Message 3's
wsa:MessageID.

Petru.




Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#63 From: "gardeap" <gardeap@...>
Date: Wed May 26, 2004 4:09 pm
Subject: WS-RM:SPEC:Minor typos? 		gardeap
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
http://Business456.com/guid/0baaf88d-483b-4ecf-a6d8-a7c2eb546817
shows up as a duplicate wsa:MessageID for the following
messages: "Create Sequence", "Message 3" and "Terminate Sequence"
and the retransmission of "Message 2" using Message 3's
wsa:MessageID.

Petru.

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#62 From: Doug Davis <dug@...>
Date: Tue May 25, 2004 6:59 pm
Subject: RE: Minutes from second RM interop workshop - May 12-13, 2004 		dugibm
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
  
The spec is clear that the last one to arrive wins (it says: Its presence
MUST override any previously established expiration).  However, the
problem you mentioned (about the sender and receiver being out of sync if
messages are lost) is a valid.
-Dug

Please respond to WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
To:     <WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com>
cc:
Subject:        RE: [WS-RM-Workshops] Minutes from second RM interop workshop -
May 12-13,
2004


I would also like to get clarifications on the following issue.

There is an expires element on the wsrm sequence header.

/wsrm:Sequence/wsu:Expires
This optional element indicates the point in time at which the Sequence
will expire.  Its value is a dateTime.  Its presence MUST override any
previously established expiration.  Expiration should be established as
described in Section 4.3.  A SequenceAcknowledgement that covers the
MessageNumber of the message that carries a <wsu:Expires> element indicates
acceptance of the new value.

Theoretically, each message can carry a different expires value.  So on
the receiving end, which value should take precedence?  The last received
message or the message with the highest message number?  It would seem to
make sense to use the last received message (I believe that's the
assumption we made during the interop event), but then that causes
non-determinism because of retries and causes sending end and receiving
end to be out of sync in terms of the expiration time.
An ack hardly helps if its range covers two messages with a <wsu:Expires>
element.


Lei

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT




Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WS-RM-Workshops/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WS-RM-Workshops-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#61 From: "Lei Jin" <ljin@...>
Date: Tue May 25, 2004 6:52 pm
Subject: RE: Minutes from second RM interop workshop - May 12-13, 2004 		j_l_lei
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I would also like to get clarifications on the following issue.
 
There is an expires element on the wsrm sequence header.
 

/wsrm:Sequence/wsu:Expires

This optional element indicates the point in time at which the Sequence will expire.  Its value is a dateTime.  Its presence MUST override any previously established expiration.  Expiration should be established as described in Section 4.3.  A SequenceAcknowledgement that covers the MessageNumber of the message that carries a <wsu:Expires> element indicates acceptance of the new value.

 

Theoretically, each message can carry a different expires value.  So on the receiving end, which value should take precedence?  The last received message or the message with the highest message number?  It would seem to make sense to use the last received message (I believe that's the assumption we made during the interop event), but then that causes non-determinism because of retries and causes sending end and receiving end to be out of sync in terms of the expiration time.
An ack hardly helps if its range covers two messages with a <wsu:Expires> element.
 
 
Lei

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#60 From: WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri May 21, 2004 2:51 am
Subject: New file uploaded to WS-RM-Workshops 		WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
  
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the WS-RM-Workshops
group.

   File        : /RM interop workshop2 notes.doc
   Uploaded by : jthelin_microsoft <jthelin@...>
   Description : RM interop workshop2 notes

You can access this file at the URL

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WS-RM-Workshops/files/RM%20interop%20workshop2%20n\
otes.doc

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

jthelin_microsoft <jthelin@...>

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (5)
#59 From: "Jorgen Thelin" <jthelin@...>
Date: Thu May 20, 2004 4:17 pm
Subject: Minutes from second RM interop workshop - May 12-13, 2004 		jthelin_micr...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Attached minutes from the second RM interop workshop.

 


Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (3)
#58 From: "mikedice417" <mikedice@...>
Date: Wed May 12, 2004 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: Interop Workshop Day1 endpoints 		mikedice417
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
Correction for IBM:
http://10.32.2.140:8080/wsrm/services/rmDemos


--- In WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com, "mikedice417"
<mikedice@m...> wrote:
> For your copy-n-pasting pleasure, here are the endpoints for day
one
> ws-rm workshop (5-12-04)
>
> IBM:
> http://10.32.2.140:8080/wsrm/services/rmdemos
>
> MS - George
> PING
>
http://10.32.2.114/RmScenariosServiceWeb/PingServiceDestination.ashx
>
> Echo
>
http://10.32.2.114/RmScenariosServiceWeb/EchoServiceDestination.ashx
>
> Secure Ping
>
http://10.32.2.114/RmScenariosServiceWeb/SecurePingServiceDestination
> .ashx
>
> MS - Mike
> PING
>
http://10.32.2.217/RmScenariosServiceWeb/PingServiceDestination.ashx
>
> Echo
>
http://10.32.2.217/RmScenariosServiceWeb/EchoServiceDestination.ashx
>
> Secure Ping
>
http://10.32.2.217/RmScenariosServiceWeb/SecurePingServiceDestination
> .ashx
>
>
> Apache
> http://10.32.2.116:8070/axis/services/PingService
> http://10.32.2.116:8070/axis/services/EchoStringService
>
> BEA
> http://10.32.2.128:7011/inerop/Ping
> http://10.32.2.128:7011/e1/EchoStringService

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#57 From: "mikedice417" <mikedice@...>
Date: Wed May 12, 2004 4:24 pm
Subject: Interop Workshop Day1 endpoints 		mikedice417
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
For your copy-n-pasting pleasure, here are the endpoints for day one
ws-rm workshop (5-12-04)

IBM:
http://10.32.2.140:8080/wsrm/services/rmdemos

MS - George
PING
http://10.32.2.114/RmScenariosServiceWeb/PingServiceDestination.ashx

Echo
http://10.32.2.114/RmScenariosServiceWeb/EchoServiceDestination.ashx

Secure Ping
http://10.32.2.114/RmScenariosServiceWeb/SecurePingServiceDestination
.ashx

MS - Mike
PING
http://10.32.2.217/RmScenariosServiceWeb/PingServiceDestination.ashx

Echo
http://10.32.2.217/RmScenariosServiceWeb/EchoServiceDestination.ashx

Secure Ping
http://10.32.2.217/RmScenariosServiceWeb/SecurePingServiceDestination
.ashx


Apache
http://10.32.2.116:8070/axis/services/PingService
http://10.32.2.116:8070/axis/services/EchoStringService

BEA
http://10.32.2.128:7011/inerop/Ping
http://10.32.2.128:7011/e1/EchoStringService

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#56 From: "Lei Jin" <ljin@...>
Date: Wed May 12, 2004 7:04 am
Subject: BEA endpoint for interop event 		j_l_lei
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
The BEA endpoint for WSRM Interop is available at:

For Ping scenarios:
http://172.17.31.128:7011/interop/Ping
http://172.17.31.128:7012/interop/Ping

For Echo scenarios:
http://172.17.31.128:7011/e1/EchoStringService
http://172.17.31.128:7012/e1/EchoStringService

These are accessible within BEA.

Lei

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#55 From: "dugibm" <dug@...>
Date: Wed May 12, 2004 3:56 am
Subject: Re: Fault Generation Scenario 3.1 		dugibm
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email
  
I agree that the Fault was intended to be sent back reliably on
the same response sequence, so let's just drop the FaultTo EPR.
I'll try to update IBM's site as soon as I can.
-Dug


--- In WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com, "georgecopelandmicrosoft"
<gcope@m...> wrote:
> The RM Fault Generation scenario (3.1) was not specified in enough
> detail, just based on the fact that different people are reading it
> differently.  Eg, on the Microsoft RM endpoint, I originally
assumed
> that the Fault message was not reliable, since FaultTo could be
> different from ReplyTo.
> After talking with others about this, I think the intent was for
the
> Fault message to be reliable, so I suggest the following:
> - The Fault message is reliable.
> - The Fault message is sent on the same sequence as the other
> response messages.
> - To facilitate the above, the request messages should not have a
> FaultTo, so the ReplyTo is implied per the WS-Addressing spec
rules.
>
> I changed the Microsoft endpoint to reflect this.  Thanks.
>
>     George Copeland

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#54 From: "georgecopelandmicrosoft" <gcope@...>
Date: Tue May 11, 2004 1:48 am
Subject: Fault Generation Scenario 3.1 		georgecopela...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
The RM Fault Generation scenario (3.1) was not specified in enough
detail, just based on the fact that different people are reading it
differently.  Eg, on the Microsoft RM endpoint, I originally assumed
that the Fault message was not reliable, since FaultTo could be
different from ReplyTo.
After talking with others about this, I think the intent was for the
Fault message to be reliable, so I suggest the following:
- The Fault message is reliable.
- The Fault message is sent on the same sequence as the other
response messages.
- To facilitate the above, the request messages should not have a
FaultTo, so the ReplyTo is implied per the WS-Addressing spec rules.

I changed the Microsoft endpoint to reflect this.  Thanks.

     George Copeland

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (2)
#53 From: "georgecopelandmicrosoft" <gcope@...>
Date: Wed May 5, 2004 5:27 pm
Subject: Microsoft endpoint 		georgecopela...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
The Microsoft endpoint for the second RM Workshop is now available
at:

http://131.107.72.15/RMScenariosClientWeb/Endpoint.aspx

Please let me know if you have any problems.  Thanks.

     George Copeland

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#52 From: "David Langworthy" <dlan@...>
Date: Wed May 5, 2004 4:45 pm
Subject: RE: WS-RM Interop Endpoint 		davidlangworthy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

The authors have updated the schema to correct this issue.  It is available at

 

http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/rm/

 

Thank you very much for the input.

 

From: Mitko Iliev [mailto:imitko@...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 8:58 AM
To: WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [WS-RM-Workshops] WS-RM Interop Endpoint

 

Thanks for the quick response.


Doug Davis wrote:

> oops - ok I've fixed it but it might not be until tomorrow before the
> fix gets migrated to the endpoint.
> One question though - since there are no parameters on that operation
> shouldn't the encodingStyle attribute be ignored?
>
The CreateSequence is defined in WS-RM XSD as <xs:element
name="CreateSequence"/>; thus no attributes are allowed AFAIK.

Best Regards,
Mitko

> -Dug
>
> Please respond to WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
>
> To: WS-RM-Workshops@yahoogroups.com
> cc:
> Subject: Re: [WS-RM-Workshops] WS-RM Interop Endpoint
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When trying the demo client I noticed an "encodingStyle" attribute in
> CreateSequence SOAP request:
> >>> excerpt
> <ns1:CreateSequence
> soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
> xmlns:ns1="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/rm"/>
> <<
>
> This IMHO is not supposed to exists in CreateSequence as it's
> document/literal encoded SOAP message?
>
> Regards,
> Mitko
>
>
> Doug Davis wrote:
>
> > IBM's WS-RM endpoint at:
> > http://wsi.alphaworks.ibm.com:8080/wsrm/index.html supports the
> > scenarios described in the interop doc (except the security ones). If
> > anyone gets a chance to try it out or even to put up their own
> > endpoint before the interop please let me know.
> > thanks,
> > -Dug
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *Yahoo! Groups Links*
> >
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WS-RM-Workshops/
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > WS-RM-Workshops-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:WS-RM-Workshops-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Mitko Iliev
> Developer Virtuoso Team
> OpenLink Software
> http://www.openlinksw.com/virtuoso
> Cross Platform Web Services Middleware
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WS-RM-Workshops/
>       
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       WS-RM-Workshops-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:WS-RM-Workshops-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>       
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>


--
Mitko Iliev
Developer Virtuoso Team
OpenLink Software
http://www.openlinksw.com/virtuoso
Cross Platform Web Services Middleware



Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (9)
#51 From: "David Orchard" <dorchard@...>
Date: Wed May 5, 2004 6:14 am
Subject: Updated WS-RM Scenarios Document 		dorchard123
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
  
I've attached an update to the Scenarios document for the interop testing.  It
has the new legal notice and the URI changes for security and addressing.

Cheers,
Dave

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
#50 From: "Deirdre Gerhardt" <dgerhardt@...>
Date: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:53 pm
Subject: OpenLink Virtuoso Universal Server WS-RM Interop Endpoint 		deirdre_gerh...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
WS-RM Group:
 
OpenLinks Virtuoso Universal Server now supports the latest version of the WS-RM
specification.   We have created a WS-Reliable Messaging demonstration on http://demo.openlinksw.com:8890/tutorial/services/rm_s_1/rm_s_1.vsp?f=2#2.   
We have tested it against the IBM, Systinet and BEA endpoints.
 
Your feedback is welcome.

 
Regards,
 
Deirdre Gerhardt
Product Manager (Virtuoso Universal Server)
OpenLink Software
Universal Server Technology Providers
http://www.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/whatis.htm
 

Reply | Forward | Messages in this Topic (1)
Messages 50 - 83 of 119   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Message #
Search:
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help