G'Day Gang

G'Day George.

Yes I had a feeling that was the case I couldn't see them just taking
the one picture this one looks to me (and I assume Judy took the
picture)like she is standing in one circular patch taking a picture
of the other, err, patch using the children to mark the spot.

Your years at VUFORs did they, Judy/Paul ever display any sort of awe
or describe in detail these patches or were they unimpressed with
them.

You know like do they think they (circle) had been messed up
(although a roughly thirty foot circle messed up and calling it a
patch still bugs me) any other information other than what is in the
D/Jounal?

Thanks George cheers Les

--- In Westallhighschoolufo@yahoogroups.com, "George" <aufornvic@...>
wrote:
>
> Hi Les, it's funny how no-one has come up with that photo, even
after all this time. Surely someone has one.
> Cheers...George
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: westisall
> To: Westallhighschoolufo@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:34 AM
> Subject: [Westallhighschoolufo] Re-err-Circles
>
>
> G'Day Gang.
>
> Just recently I've worked out where Judy/Paul took their Photo's
and
> the workers cottage where Paul spoke to a gentleman residing
there.
>
> It is the property next door(the sand mines) West of what's left
of
> the Grange today.
>
> The photo was taken looking to the West the main stumbling block
or
> mental block is the trees in the background appear to be along a
> fence line whereas in the AP 66 there isn't a fence ignore the 2D
> effect of the VUFOR photo.
>
> Just a couple of days ago I found a website where George (Hello
> George) has had an impression of a circle or part there of placed
in
> the VUFORs photo, of how George remembers it from slides/photos
he
> saw of the circle/s whilst he was a member of VUFORs.(correct me
if
> I'm wrong George)
>
> It has always had me perplexed at the way Judy describe them as
> a "couple of circular patches" and said the wind might have
caused
> them (D/Journal) and Mr Shepherd with his pad/s and many other
> witnesses when you asked them which way the grass was flattened
they
> would say just flattened you also notice they don't mention
scorching
> or burnt either (others have.)
>
> The witnesses who claim that the craft landed on the oval also
have a
> problem when you ask them to describe the circle they mention
tall
> grass flattened over. (the grass was kept short/mowed on the
school
> property)
>
> I'm suggesting that with time a witness remembers the school
ground,
> the event/circle/s etc and blends them together or knows the
Grange
> well and blends the event to a particular memory of the grange or
> works at the southeast part of the old Grange and has the circles
at
> the back of his works.
>
> It is only food for thought I'm suggesting that the getting there
as
> in my case as well was not important and so forgotten, filled in
with
> a montage of images from those times from our memories.
>
> You have the images of the event and later in time you ask
yourself
> now where exactly was it.(regarding Circle/s)
>
> And I'm not saying that is the case for all witnesses.
>
> Is this possible?
>
> Damn nearly forgot the link
>
> http://www.auforn.com/westall.html
>
> If George's memory of the photo is correct and I don't doubt it,
then
> Judy was correct in assuming the wind could have form them (wind
> shear) or the kids that were there made them or the Farmer whom I
> have spoken on two occasion said he did some work up at the top
> paddock around that time and had equipment failure.
>
> George's impression of the circle has that "bowl" effect whereas
I
> remember, counter rotating flattened grass, at the circumference
a
> sharp finish between the flattened grass and the standing grass.
>
> Whatever did this didn't move on its axis.
>
> Better go Cheers Les
>