Hi Blar, I took a look at Silk's analysis and it looks good. I appreciate both your input and MC's for clearing up the issue. I can't see the PX arriving in...
Not too sure what you mean, but you did help me with my planning. I see the human potential as comprising more than the intellect (the higher level is direct...
Re: To Truth Quest Hi Michael, Good to see you here. Well I have a few questions you could ask at Nasa. If you can get answers that would be great. If you...
Latest on PX in 2003 from Jason @ X-Facts.com. It is becoming obvious by now that those individuals who have been (and are still) pushing 'px in 2003' are...
Tim Edwards
tedwards@...
Jan 4, 2003 6:08 pm
881
... <dewerly@y...> wrote: [snip] ... As I read the above paragraphs I found myself asking: "Where did you get this crapola?" Then I got to the signature.......
... Nice to see someone asking basic questions BUT I don't work for NASA and therefore can't speak for them. Like wise, you are a troll posing as an innocent...
... IMO, as the deadline approaches many of Hazelwood's 'followers' will be forced to turn elsewhere for their 'information' on the return of PX. Will most...
Tim Edwards
tedwards@...
Jan 5, 2003 7:43 am
884
Just when I was beginning to take you seriously, I clearly see now you are in COMPLETE denial. ... you ... wrong. ... paranoid ... each ... ...
... Denial of what? Can you be more specific? Most of that post to which I responded is from the "innuendo" school of "information". I'm no rube from the woods...
... Indeed, good example, but not for what you're trying to say. NASA told the public about a near-miss one week AFTER the object missed Earth. Now, NASA did...
... about ... anyone ... Let me share something with y'all. I feel that whether or not you think I have a clue at the end, you might find one or two...
... Why did you just cherry-pick one coment out of my entire post to include and comment upon? What I was "trying to say" would be more clear if you had...
I have preprocessed and median-stacked the FITS with IRIS. I see NOTHING new, no pixels, no splotches, no blobs, nothing. Again I tell you all I am not an...
... tell ... I ... It could go something like this: (Snip) (KingBee) NEXT QUESTION: Hamas and Bell have analyized the Jan. 10th images and have found nothing, ...
... Sounds about right. Obany has been kicking the "debunkers" left and right lately. Guess they're getting quite protective of having Nancy play hard ball ...
... So totally whatever. Until I see the log on the ZT site, I doubt this transcript is legit. Nancy does NOT spell her name with an I. Whatever entity is...
... tell ... I ... There's some sporadic noise on a couple frames just to the East of the coordinates (that would project for January 10th). Since Dell adds...
... see ... Again I ... least ... yet, and ... and right ... play hard ball ... quick because ... this transcript is legit. Nancy does NOT spell her name with...
... Wow, what on Earth was I smoking? Oh yeah. Regardless, my apologies to MJ are in order. I also employ that literary mechanism from time to time. Sorry...
That humerous log was from existedb4, not from me. ... doubt this ... Whatever ... the above ... apologies to MJ are in order. I also employ that literary...
Brian van der Spuy said: << This Planet X thing is really rather curious. I first became aware of it around 1998, when I joined a list somewhat similar to this...