Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
aalto-xml-interest · Aalto XML Parser (stax)
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Performance comparison, external   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #37 of 61 |
(cc:ing to woodstox-users/dev, since it is related to Woodstox too...
as well as Aalto)

Apologies for posting this again, but I think that it's good to check out:

http://code.google.com/p/thrift-protobuf-compare/wiki/Benchmarking

since there have been some changes, more things compared and so on.

So while it's not 100% clear which is fastest choice (Protocol
Buffers, Thrift or Json with Jackson), it's safe to say that
performance differences between these candidates are not huge. And
that's sort of amazing, considering how many things one has to give up
when using non-self-descriptive binary formats, without getting
order-of-magnitude faster performance. :)

Of course all the usual disclaimers apply: benchmarks are always
unfair, not relevant to all use cases and so on.
But at least here code is open source, methodology is simple,
repeatable, and implementations chosen are best-of-breed for data
formats.

-+ Tatu +-



Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:51 pm

cowtowncoder
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #37 of 61 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

(cc:ing to woodstox-users/dev, since it is related to Woodstox too... as well as Aalto) Apologies for posting this again, but I think that it's good to check...
Tatu Saloranta
cowtowncoder
Offline Send Email
Mar 31, 2009
6:51 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help