Hi,

I know that this is not intuitive, but, replace:
# with \201
and
b with \202

Examples:
(E/G\201) (- 4 x 2 4 0 0) brac
(E\202) (- x x 1 3 4 3) brac

That is because abcm2ps replaces # and b for a code which is replaced
with Postscript accidentals (the glyphs are generated by abcm2ps: they
are not characters from the 'original' fonts).

Hudson

Chuck Boody wrote:
> Beats me. I don't speak Italian either. I guess we'll need to wait
> for Hudson to check in.
>
> Chuck Boody
>
> On Jun 25, 2009, at 5:31 PM, dglenn@... wrote:
>
>> Chuck Boody <cboody@...> wrote:
>>> You will need to add chord diagrams for each chord you want to
>>> interpret. Just add the needed chords to this list that is in the
>>> code:
>>>
>>> /gcshow-bracinho{
>>> (C) (- 0 3 2 0 1 0) brac
>>> (D) (- x - 0 2 3 2) brac
>>> (E) (- 0 2 2 1 0 0) brac
>>> (F) (1a. 1[ 3 3 2 - 1]) brac
>>> (G) (- 3 2 0 0 0 3) brac
>>> (A) (- - 0 3 3 3 0) brac
>>> (B) (- x 2[ 4 4 4 2]) brac
>>> (Cm) (3a. x 1[ 3 3 2 1]) brac
>>> (Bm7/5d) (- x 2 3 2 3 x) brac
>>> gcshow-b}!
>> That worked just fine for A/E, Edim7, and Bm6, but no diagram
>> is displayed for E/G# or F#m.
>>
>> My assumption at this point is that I am doing _something_
>> wrong that the (Italan?) comments at the start of bracinho.fmt
>> would tell me if I were better educated (i.e. if I spoke
>> more languages than I do).
>>
>> Here's what I added before the 'gcshow-b' line:
>>
>> (E/G#) (- 4 x 2 4 0 0) brac
>> (F#m7) (- 2[ 4 2 2 2 2]) brac
>> (A/E) (- x x 2 2 2 0) brac
>> (B/F#) (- 2[ 2 4 4 4 2]) brac
>> (D/A) (- x 0 0 2 3 2) brac
>> (Bm6) (- x 2 x 1 3 2) brac
>> (F#m) (- 2 4 4 2 2 2) brac
>> (B/A) (- x 0 4 4 4 2) brac
>> (E/B) (- x 2 2 1 0 0) brac
>> (Cdim7) (- x 3 4 2 4 x) brac
>> (A#dim7) (- x 1 2 0 2 0) brac
>> (F/C) (- x 3 3 2 1 1) brac
>> (G/D) (- x x 0 4 3 3) brac
>> (F/A) (- x 0 3 2 1 1) brac
>> (Edim7) (- x x 2 3 2 3) brac
>> (Bm/F#) (- 2[ 2 4 4 3 2]) brac
>> (Fdim7) (- 1 x 0 1 0 1) brac
>> (D#dim7) (- x x 1 2 1 2) brac
>> (A/C#) (- x 4 3[ 3 3 x]) brac
>> (Bm7) (- x 2[ 4 2 3 2]) brac
>>
>> At first glance, everything looks right except for the absence
>> of any diagrams over the chords with '#' in their names.
>>
>> -- Glenn
>>