hi,

offcourse it can, math is just a model....so it must be can show anything. Depend on the paradigm of the maker, the matrix.

 

can i  help u

 

Im a student at Bandung Institute of Technology, graduete program in development studies. Im now using dinamics modeling to 'modeling' social phenomena....itnteresting. the 'war' between the paradigm and method...:-)

 

regards,

ASP

actor-network-theory@yahoogroups.com wrote:

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save up to 80% on top-quality inkjet cartridges and get your order fast!
FREE shipping on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. Shop at Myinks.com!
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/v2G7ND/KfUGAA/ySSFAA/4IYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
actor-network-theory-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is 1 message in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. structural autonomy and betweenness centrality
From: "flarkje"


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 13:17:14 -0000
From: "flarkje"
Subject: structural autonomy and betweenness centrality

Hi! I'm studying social sciences in Holland. For a research I am
doing, I want to know a theoretical argument why betweenness
centrality (more or less) should run parallel with structural
autonomy. Is it posible to demonstrate this mathematical way?

Is there anyone who can help me with this?

Thanx!






________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/