Thanks Gerard for the heads up. I think that the issue is really
one of marketing tailored to the community. I respect the efforts made by the
individual who posted at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Xhosa_Wikipedia
, and s/he has clearly thought about this.
However to say that there is no interest among 6 million Xhosa
speakers in Wikipedia certainly covers a lot of diverse realities. My guess is
that in this case, as in many others, the vast majority of speakers who have
access to computers and the internet have little or no idea what Wikipedia is.
A few do, and apparently those are not interested enough to motivate them to get
actively involved. My guess is that there are probably some people who would
really get into it but they do not know about it.
As much as I like Wikipedia and its overall philosophy and
approach, I really do think that it needs a new paradigm for dealing with less
widely spoken languages. If the Xhosa Wikipedia is closed, it is not a failure
of Xhosa speakers to take an interest, and it is not a failure of User:Jcwf to
do more. It is a failure of marketing, however it is put, and that goes back to
the apparent expectation in Wikipedia that "if you build it, they will
come." That doesn't work for many languages. More imaginative approaches
should be taken, individual contacts need to be made. Jcwf did good by
contacting the chancellor of Fort Hare University, but more individual contacts
need to be made and if necessary Wikimedia Fndn should find a way to implement
such a longer term focused effort. Have translators and professors of Xhosa been
contacted? Have ways of incorporating smaller Wikipedias into learning programs
- or teacher education programs - been looked into? These are things that the
Wikimedia Fndn can do.
There were some Wikipedia Academies held in South Africa and I
think that this was an excellent step, but this also needs to be integrated
into a larger effort. How about a Wikipedia Academy organized with PanSALB and
or one or more Universities for teachers of Xhosa. Not just a Saturday come on
over thing, but in the mode of teacher-training?
Basically WMF has to decide whether it is really in favor of
developing the multilingual direction of Wikipedia, which involves more
strategy and more imaginative outreach, or it can just retreat into closing
projects because "no one is interested" according to casual evaluation.
Some say that when there is interest then they can start it.
Well sure, but you lose time during which the resource can develop and bring
other people. By closing and eventually deleting projects, WMF guarantees that time
is lost and that a resource like Xhosa Wikipedia will develop more slowly.
Searching for an analogy here - it's maybe like the proverbial
bush taxi. It won't start so what do you do - roll it into the garage and order
the part, meanwhile letting the passengers go off wherever? Or do you give iet a
push start or a jump start and get to where you're going (pick up the part you
need on the way or whatever)? I think that WMF needs to keep the goal in mind,
the goal of getting diverse Wikipedias going, and not be limited in the mindset
that if it doesn't start on its own there ain't nothing to do but put it up on
blocks.
Sorry for the rant, and again I realize that there are good
people doing good work, but there does not seem to be a good overall strategy
for African language editions of Wikipedia, and this latest announcement
concerning the Xhosa Wikipedia is another proof of that. That is the critical
issue here, not whether Xhosa, and this and that language Wikipedia should be
closed for lack of interest.
I want to thank you again, Gerard, for taking the time to pass
on word. I confess that I haven't had time to follow foundation-l or to monitor
the Meta-Wiki to catch these things. Do you think it is possible that notices
concerning African language editions of Wikipedia come regularly to this list?
There is a community of people interested in this topic here, and I've listed
the list on Meta-Wiki http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Afrophonewikis
. As part of developing a serious strategy for African language Wikipedias, how
about better integrating this group in the discussions?
Don
From:
afrophonewikis@yahoogroups.com [mailto:afrophonewikis@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Gerard Meijssen
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 9:19 AM
To: Afrophone Wikis
Subject: [afrophonewikis] Proposal for closure of the Xhosa Wikipedia
Hoi,
I just noticed that it has been proposed to close down the Xhosa Wikipedia. The
proposal
describes that considerable effort has been spend to generate interest for this
project. It does not work.
On a different project, as internationally oriented as Wikipedia is, I was told
that the project could not be any good because it had not originated in Africa.
I absolutely agree that it is people from outside of Africa who want to see
vibrant projects in African languages. It has only been the African languages
that have been treated with a special interest and this does not work.
Do you agree with me that it is may be better to be as inviting to Africans and
African languages as we are to any and all other people and languages ? This
means that they are as welcome as they were before but that they have to jump
through the same hoops as everybody else to demonstrate their intention to make
their project their own. Or do you have an alternative ?
Thanks,
Gerard