... Did you get yourself removed? I'm getting _really_ annoyed with the IIST spam I get. I'm afraid that if I categorize these mails as spam, the spamfilter...
... This is the first I've seen of this thread. I suppose I wasn't paying attention. I can say that Kim offered at least one truth but also one lie. Let me...
Is Delphi Fit actually usable at this point? It seemed like a dead project a year or so ago. Otherwise, have you considered using DUnit to drive your...
Hello Rob, That's the point! The customer's project does not have what we can call a decent separation between view and the rest. That's why we decided to try ...
Hi Walter, I suspected that in an agile group you were ... In fact I'm not looking for a unit testing tool, mostly of the project's architecture does not allow...
I was in a similar situation a couple years ago. We tried TestComplete... it was OK, but those tests are far too brittle for our/my liking. So my only...
Hi Pekka, ... I never got around to it, but I haven't received any messages from them since the post. Could be that I have spam-tagged them, though, and I just...
... I think your right, 'DelphiFit' does seem long dead - though someone could pick it up.....which I believe is what Michal above did to create his...
... decent separation between view and the rest. That's why we decided to try acceptance tests, from the view point of view. This would be a way to guarantee...
... I really would like to learn other approaches to do this. Any remark/suggestion/input will be really welcome. ... I believe that a test plan executed...
... I'm late to the party here, but what have you been doing up until now? And won't retrofitting a legacy app with user-facing acceptance tests - enough to...
We're using Hudson for Continuous Integration, and we have a few branches of our software. We're running into issues where tests(different branches) against...
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:51:50AM -0700, Chuck wrote: -> We're using Hudson for Continuous Integration, -> and we have a few branches of our software. We're...
... remark/suggestion/input will be really welcome. So let me rephrase the question. Is there /any/ way, other than by surveying the /entire/ application via...
We're running into issues ... I would strongly recommend a different database for each branch's test environment. That's really your only sane and rational...
A database per branch is the most direct solution. It gives the best parallelism in execution, and the best isolation of branches from one another.  If you...
Hello all, As our company is creating its first process draft, we've almost finished with the main development phase process, but what about the support...
This is a question I'm interested in as well. In the past, we have had problems trying to fit ongoing support of our product into our Scrum process. By its...
... finished ... phase?, ... this ... I think the canonical answer is that there is no explicit support phase. Support activities that influence development...
The Agile Vancouver user group is hosting a conference Nov. 4 - 6 in Vancouver, BC. This all-volunteer group has organized a great mix of tutorials and track...
... Thanks Lisa. I live just outside of Vancouver, BC. If anyone wants info on the place or suggestions for places to stay, eat, or activities, please contact...
In some teams, the support team is separate from new development. On large applications and products, this is actually quite common. I have seen maintenance /...
Hello Michael, Thank you for your input, I really appreciate that. Let me provide you more information about this project, then it will be easier for you to...
Hi Samuel, I know EXACTLY what you are facing, as i had the exact same challenge with introducing agile development and TestDrivenDevelopment into my current...
I seem to remember a tool that augments JUnit by changing code that is being unit tested to see if the unit tests catches the changes. In affect it was a way...
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Hank Roark wrote: -> I seem to remember a tool that augments JUnit by changing code that is being -> unit tested to...