Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
agilemodeling · Agile Modeling
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [AM] Re: UML Tool Doubt   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #5166 of 8924 |
RE: [AM] Re: UML Tool Doubt

(responding to Ashley, Srinivasan)

> I am not an expert on realtime/embedded systems development,
> so I can't really answer this. My guess would be No, but
> someone else on this list might be able to give a more
> authoritative answer.

Logically speaking, I can't see why, if any tool were *really*
good at forward-engineering, one would ever want to
reverse-engineer. The "round-trip" tools I know are
there because they do a good job of organising and
re-organising the gross structure of the code as models,
but can't do anything with the fine detail of the code.

I recall I used to use an assembly-level debugger so I
could visually inspect the low-level code produced by the
compiler. I don't think I've done that in the last 10 years.

I expect some time in the next 10 years I will have a tool
that forward-engineers code from models, and I will not
feel the need to inspect the code, trusting the forward
generation. I've seen tools that already forward-generate
onto specific architectures, ones that will plug in
parts for different architectures. If they weren't so
expensive they'd be used a lot more already, IMHO.

Paul Oldfield


===========================================================
Our e-mail domain has now changed from iraspire.com to hmrcaspire.com. Please
update your address books.
===========================================================




Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:47 am

paul_oldfiel...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #5166 of 8924 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

In a message dated 12/15/2006 7:42:44 AM Pacific Standard Time, jpt@... writes: Such a UML tool can't exist. Main reason is that the semantics of UML...
PeteCRuth@...
petecruth
Offline Send Email
Dec 15, 2006
7:01 pm

Pete, I concur with these points from jpt. Having worked for CASE tool vendors and modelling tool vendors in the past I have seen a variety of angles on...
John Cheesman
stratasoftware
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2006
9:10 am

Pete To add the points that John Cheesman makes (with which I agree entirely): Within the MDA community there are two schools of thought, sometimes called...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2006
11:06 am

Ashley ... Is it possible to have 100% roundtrip engineering for realtime/embedded systems?? Please let give more information on this. thanx & regards ...
srini vasan
jsrinivasan2k
Offline Send Email
Dec 18, 2006
11:37 am

Srinivasan ... I am not an expert on realtime/embedded systems development, so I can't really answer this. My guess would be No, but someone else on this list...
Ashley at Metamaxim
keplervic
Offline Send Email
Dec 21, 2006
10:12 am

(responding to Ashley, Srinivasan) ... Logically speaking, I can't see why, if any tool were *really* good at forward-engineering, one would ever want to ...
Oldfield, Paul (ASPIRE)
paul_oldfiel...
Offline Send Email
Dec 21, 2006
10:52 am

... What happens if you have some people on the team who prefer "visual programming" via modeling and others who prefer "text programming" via a code editor? ...
Scott Ambler
scottwambler
Offline Send Email
Dec 26, 2006
2:30 pm

In addition, one might want to use reverse engineering of machine-generated source to: * see what the code looks like in a different view(s). * see code added...
Jon Kern
jonkernpa
Offline Send Email
Dec 27, 2006
4:01 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help