Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

ai-philosophy · Philosophical Foundations of AI

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

Description

A continuation of the long deceased comp.ai.philosophy in which logical people used to argue about the philosophical aspects of AI and philosophy of mind in general. Now that USENET has been shut down, long live ai-philosophy!

Our subjects are mainly, but not limited to, philosophy of mind, artificial intelligence, computation, and language. We frequently find ourselves discussing aspects of philosophy of science, physics, mathematics. We also like to discuss different CS approaches to AI, ethical questions raised by AI, and other issues surrounding AI, including a bit of humor every now and then. As usual, people are passionate about their views about these fundamental subjects, and they will try hard to maintain their position. However, we do try to entertain a variety of views in this group, as long as they respect the scientific understanding of the world. Thus, if you are a creationist, this group is not for you! The founders of this group think that religion and in general mysticism are obsolete approaches to answer the significant questions about intelligence.

There are experts and inexperts in our group. Feyerabend once said that "the voice of the inexpert must be heard", and this is a place to voice your opinion. However, we cannot afford to tolerate trolls, spammers and flamewars. There has been, unfortunately, enough of that on USENET.

To join our group, please briefly tell us who you are and and your interest in the subject matter. You must supply enough information to convince the moderators that you are not a bot.

For inquiries, contact group founder Eray Ozkural (examachine-at-yahoo)

Image "Digital Phoenix" Copyright (C) 2008 by Ragip Akyildiz

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
Re: Why Quine-Putnam indispensability thesis is wrong
I don't want to be put in the position of defending Putnam. He's held nearly every possible position on every subject. Not that long ago I asked him a
Posted - Wed May 22, 2013 6:24 pm
walto
walterhorn
Send Email Send Email
Re: Why Quine-Putnam indispensability thesis is wrong
Dear Walto, What makes you think I should agree with anything Putnam says? He strikes me as a platonist and dualist and that's truly creationism. What's cute
Posted - Wed May 22, 2013 5:33 pm
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Send Email Send Email
Re: Why Quine-Putnam indispensability thesis is wrong
Again, not one word of your post has anything to do with holism, which you (in your cute way) maintained was akin to creationism. I (again) respond that it is
Posted - Wed May 22, 2013 1:53 pm
walto
walterhorn
Send Email Send Email
Re: Why Quine-Putnam indispensability thesis is wrong
Ok, that's fair. It's only because of the lack of imagination of Platonists that they think P2 is true. I have, in the past, several times, explained why that
Posted - Tue May 21, 2013 10:38 pm
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Send Email Send Email
Re: Why Quine-Putnam indispensability thesis is wrong
Eray, we know you disagree with those two premises. You may be right about that (though you don't deign to give any arguments--as usual, you just
Posted - Tue May 21, 2013 2:21 pm
walto
walterhorn
Send Email Send Email
Add ai-philosophy to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2013 28 4 5 3 85
2012 26 76 7 8 5 3 10 19 33 1 4
2011 5 28 7 72 17 5 27 72 66 10
2010 8 20 9 15 27 120 17 3 10 1
2009 94 76 95 74 126 326 599 143 40 35 9 5
2008 244 233 147 86 85 21 14 74 80 22 137 162
2007 529 322 500 445 634 355 460 550 333 389 162 132
2006 529 424 590 173 452 529 262 256 219 150 326 458
2005 165 338 344 393 385 392 305 296 399 697 625 376
2004 17 11 9 12 11 8 21 103 49 117 200 149
2003 2 7 15

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help