Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ai-philosophy · Philosophical Foundations of AI
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Software?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #17096 of 17538 |
Re: [ai-philosophy] Re: Software?

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Peter
Brawley<peter.brawley@...> wrote:
>
>
> Eray,
>
> Your pronouncement that computer simulations “will simulate everything
> necessary for intelligence, because it *will* duplicate the mechanism” is
> fantasy, an article of faith, triply bizarre in that it’s shouted in the
> name of reason, makes a grandiose empirical claim for which there’s no
> evidence, and is contradicted by your next assertion, that “the simulation
> does not need to replicate every property, it just helps us to make
> predictions”.

How is there a contradiction?

And what is the mechanism that is not duplicated?

> Nor has it been “rigorously proven”, to the satisfaction for example of most
> scientists or philosophers of science, “that a simulation *is* a scientific
> theory.” On its face, that’s a crank claim: you know, or ought to know, that
> there’s no widely agreed formula for identifying what’s a scientific theory
> and what isn’t.

A formal axiomatic theory is a kind of scientific theory, and yes all
computer simulations are exactly that. You simply don't know shit
about these subjects. You are an ignoramus.

> Likewise your claim that a “scientific theory in this sense (a formal
> axiomatic system (FAS)) is not the simple kind of FAS, so it can deal with
> complex systems, like networks of people, or evolution of galaxies, or
> financial markets”. Nothing about a set of axioms privileges it as an
> empirically accurate explanation of real world complexity.

WTF are you talking about? All of those simulations NEED empirically
adequate data OR they would not run well!!!

Idiot!

> Yes we can write analytical or numerical models for any complex process we
> please,  but your “applied mathematics” alone does not tell us whether the
> models accurately explain the things being modelled.

No, you moron that shows that simulation was already an applied method
well before there were computers.

> You freely call interlocutors & others “idiots” and worse, so you
> complaining of ad hominem remarks is just silly. Back to my filter list you
> go.

Off this list you go you effing moron

--
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
Researcher, Erendiz Superbilgisayar Ltd.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy
http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct



Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:22 pm

examachine
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #17096 of 17538 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Eray, Your pronouncement that computer simulations "will simulate everything necessary for intelligence, because it **will** duplicate the mechanism" is...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
7:15 pm

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Peter ... How is there a contradiction? And what is the mechanism that is not duplicated? ... A formal axiomatic theory is a...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
7:23 pm

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327151.600-memristor-minds-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence.html?full=true Ray...
Ray Gardener
raygard42
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
7:39 pm

... Becaue you do not have to replicate any properties at all to make predictions. A weather simulation has none of the properties of weather. THere is a gap...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
8:36 am

... How is it an error? If Newtonian mechanics isn't a kind of simulation, what is it? Is there a bug in your processor, do you need someone to fix you? -- ...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
9:40 am

... cf "all dogs are mammals" and "all mammals are dogs". I mean, have you actually studied logic? ... A set of equations that don't tell you anything concrete...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
11:50 am

... But you see, unless you calculate the equations aren't realized. And the only way you can get those equations to work is to construct a *model* and solve...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 13, 2009
3:55 pm

... http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/entries/computational-mind/#Criticisms. Thank you for the link. That text does indeed seem both reasonable and brief. I...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
9:53 am

BM> I would call myself a computationalist, but by that I mean ... If "do" means "simulate approximately", the above looks like a bowdlerised version of...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
2:44 pm

... No, PB ... You might want to re-read that......
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
4:48 pm

... That's not what it means. ... That is what it means ... sometimes ... It can simulate them. That may or may not be good enough. So far no-one has actually...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
8:15 am

... So far as I can see I haven't said anything to excuse such an interpretation. By "do" I mean "do". No simulation. The computer can execute, perform,...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
4:17 pm

BM>The computer can execute, perform, accomplish ... A statement of belief, nothing more. PB...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
4:47 pm

... May I interject here? The computational power of an analog computer or a quantum computer is equivalent to the computational power of a discrete computer....
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
5:04 pm

... Of course. Was hoping you might. ... Right. Of course. That's essentially what I'm saying, but I was hoping that a different way of expressing the idea...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
7:58 pm

... Implement Conway's rules not the gliders and oscillators that emerge from those rules? JohnC...
jgkjcasey
Offline Send Email
Jul 12, 2009
12:36 am

... Yes. Good analogy, I think. Thanks. The rules we need are a lot more complex, and the system is not closed, so the emergent results are influenced by...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 12, 2009
1:37 am

I previously remarked that computers can implement connectionist networks, heuristics, or any other seemingly "non-algorithmic" or "non-computational"...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
12:03 pm

... You are right, the computer doesn't just "simulate" them, but it can implement in their full glory, that is, it can implement them AS WELL AS ANY MACHINE...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
2:42 pm

... That's faint praise ... What is the best way to understand computer *software* ? ... But that;s not actually very real. The gap beteen simulation and...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
6:47 pm

... It's not a faint praise. The connectionist networks, heuristics, statistical information processing, all of these can be realized by the computers to the...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
11:01 pm

... No. The fullest extent would be actual neurons. ... Although plenty that canot be replicated. ... Woudln't a code contain symbols? ... But not...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
5:43 pm

... Connectionist networks do not have to be implemented by biological neurons. They can be implemented by silicon hardware or just computer software. I...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
6:49 pm

... I wish Eray had left off the "and mathematical". To me it adds nothing but fuzziness to the idea that cognition is information processing or equivalently...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
10:58 pm

... Let's say "constructivist mathematics" then, or all the mathematics that matters. The part of mathematics that isn't constructivist has no cognitive...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
11:11 pm

... You've brought up "software" several times now Peter, and it occurs to me that if we can get this concept properly sorted out perhaps much of our quibbling...
wdmodlin@...
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
2:26 am

... I bring up software because it is key to certain postions and argumetns in the philosophy of AI, eg computatiopanlism and Searles' arguemtns. Someone who...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
5:30 pm

... Software isn't key to any philosophical position that I can think of. Reconfigurability can be in hardware as well as in software, does not matter as much...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
5:55 pm

... in the philosophy of AI, eg computatiopanlism and Searles' arguemtns. So you say.  But you still have not answered the question at all, you have not told...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
12:20 am

... Well it is an active component of a system, it's just that there is no magical distinction from other bits of the system. Best, -- Eray Ozkural, PhD...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
12:59 am
 First  |  |  Last 
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help