Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ai-philosophy · Philosophical Foundations of AI
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Software?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #17099 of 17538 |
Re: Software?

--- In ai-philosophy@yahoogroups.com, Bill Modlin <wdmodlin@...> wrote:
>
> ... GOFAI workers to attempt a misguided implementation
> of AI in which the elements of mental experience are formal
> symbols instantiated in the program for direct manipulation.
>
...
>
> So we program algorithms to implement that development, not
> to implement directly the things that will develop.


Implement Conway's rules not the gliders and oscillators that
emerge from those rules?

JohnC








Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:36 am

jgkjcasey
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #17099 of 17538 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

... Of course. Was hoping you might. ... Right. Of course. That's essentially what I'm saying, but I was hoping that a different way of expressing the idea...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 11, 2009
7:58 pm

... Implement Conway's rules not the gliders and oscillators that emerge from those rules? JohnC...
jgkjcasey
Offline Send Email
Jul 12, 2009
12:36 am

... Yes. Good analogy, I think. Thanks. The rules we need are a lot more complex, and the system is not closed, so the emergent results are influenced by...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 12, 2009
1:37 am

I previously remarked that computers can implement connectionist networks, heuristics, or any other seemingly "non-algorithmic" or "non-computational"...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
12:03 pm

... You are right, the computer doesn't just "simulate" them, but it can implement in their full glory, that is, it can implement them AS WELL AS ANY MACHINE...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
2:42 pm

... That's faint praise ... What is the best way to understand computer *software* ? ... But that;s not actually very real. The gap beteen simulation and...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
6:47 pm

... It's not a faint praise. The connectionist networks, heuristics, statistical information processing, all of these can be realized by the computers to the...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
11:01 pm

... No. The fullest extent would be actual neurons. ... Although plenty that canot be replicated. ... Woudln't a code contain symbols? ... But not...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
5:43 pm

... Connectionist networks do not have to be implemented by biological neurons. They can be implemented by silicon hardware or just computer software. I...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
6:49 pm

... I wish Eray had left off the "and mathematical". To me it adds nothing but fuzziness to the idea that cognition is information processing or equivalently...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
10:58 pm

... Let's say "constructivist mathematics" then, or all the mathematics that matters. The part of mathematics that isn't constructivist has no cognitive...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 14, 2009
11:11 pm

... You've brought up "software" several times now Peter, and it occurs to me that if we can get this concept properly sorted out perhaps much of our quibbling...
wdmodlin@...
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
2:26 am

... I bring up software because it is key to certain postions and argumetns in the philosophy of AI, eg computatiopanlism and Searles' arguemtns. Someone who...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
5:30 pm

... Software isn't key to any philosophical position that I can think of. Reconfigurability can be in hardware as well as in software, does not matter as much...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 15, 2009
5:55 pm

... in the philosophy of AI, eg computatiopanlism and Searles' arguemtns. So you say.  But you still have not answered the question at all, you have not told...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
12:20 am

... Well it is an active component of a system, it's just that there is no magical distinction from other bits of the system. Best, -- Eray Ozkural, PhD...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
12:59 am

... Who said there was?...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2009
5:24 pm

You implied such because you do not understand the distinction between particular and universal computers I believe. -- Eray Ozkural ...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2009
10:30 pm

... ANd no one said there was...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2009
9:59 pm

... Maybe the question is what the people who hold those positions think it is. Searle certainly thinks it is important The Critique of Computationalism and...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2009
9:58 pm

... Lol. Ok, my way of saying this was wrong. Certainly in a general-purpose computer, there are active components that read the software and put the...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
2:23 am

... No it's correct. Of course the same people who think there is no software in the brain could also look at a computer chip, see that it does pretty ...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
2:49 am

Eray O> ...Particular computers do not require any software to compute. They just take input and run. Anything that processes information *is* a computer. ...
Larry Tapper
larry_tapper
Offline Send Email
Jul 16, 2009
9:57 pm

... And what doesn't process information?...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2009
5:06 pm

İt might turn our that everything is. So what? -- Eray Ozkural http://myspace.com/arizanesil On Jul 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, "Peter D Jones"...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2009
10:27 pm

... So information-porcessing isn't specific enough to be a good defintiion of computing...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2009
8:43 am

... No, it would mean that the universe is a computer. That would make computer science physics and vica versa, but no another definition would not be needed....
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 22, 2009
10:52 am

... It or a similar abstraction is necessary to delineating the difference between concrete functions and abstract functions, and it is also necessary to...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 21, 2009
10:05 pm

... True. Programs can be implemented in hardware or software equivalently. We can consider prysical machines, languages, programs, data and memery to allo be...
Jim Whitescarver
jimscarver
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2009
12:57 am

... I'm not sure how Eray would respond, but if you read the things I posted before, I explained a distinction between purely physical processes and those...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 17, 2009
10:49 pm
 First  |  |  Last 
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help