Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ai-philosophy · Philosophical Foundations of AI
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 14870 - 14899 of 17538   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
14870
... Hi John, What kind of non-standard rules? Why is grammar so important? And... What is grammar anyway? Why is it so important? What is grammar of sign...
FastDado
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
10:43 am
14871
... Davor: As far as I can tell, and trying to be as general and practical as I can get away with, grammar is the statistical frequency of occurrence of...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
1:23 pm
14872
... Really, all I'm doing is outlining how anyone writes mundane computer programs. If it sounds nice with some hifalutin language, so much the better. ... I...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
4:37 pm
14873
... Oh, no, not at all. Even those who preach statistical approaches to natural language processing generally do so because they think there really is no such ...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
4:48 pm
14874
... I don't understand what you are saying. There is such a thing as probabilistic grammar, and I am pretty sure it *is* a grammar, in fact CFG is just a...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
5:21 pm
14875
... I suppose you can say that regular chess is just a subset of probabilistic chess. I suppose you could say arithmetic is just a subset of probablistic...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
5:35 pm
14876
... I'll happily disagree with you Josh as probabilistic grammars are much better suited to formalization of natural language than you seem to think. The...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
5:40 pm
14877
... So you 100% disagree. ... So then it's not *me* who disagree with 100%, but rather "those who preach statistical approaches" that you are speaking for,...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
5:44 pm
14878
... Hi Josh, Since this sub-thread is actually about semantics vs. grammar and what comes first I'll give you an example with a couple of context-dependent ...
FastDado
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
5:48 pm
14879
... I think that standard English grammar would require that to be: "Seattle is a wet city." That's grammar, and that's maybe all that grammar gives you. The...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
7:10 pm
14880
... For recognition of verbal or written text, they may be *useful*. Heck, much of Google depends on such Baysian association, and it's *useful* to the tune of...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2008
7:36 pm
14881
... As I've said you'll have to read a few papers to appreciate its use. And yes, it is *most definitely* a formalization. There is no doubt about that. You...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
1:43 am
14882
... Very funny, but the sexist subtext might send shivers down the spines of some. Just ask my wife. -- Joe...
Joe Legris
jalegris
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
2:35 am
14883
... I saw nothing new in the wiki article. I really think my disagreement is in principle, but that mainly the applications of this are outside of my domain of...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
4:00 am
14884
... Really, Josh, you would have to explain to me how a weighted CFG is not a formal grammar. Best, -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
9:09 am
14885
... Hi Josh and the other's , What I mean with grammar is No-existing grammer for human talks,chomsky was true,but he could also say the all is ...
Afshin Sadeghi
sadeghi.afshin
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
12:25 pm
14886
... Anyway Davor; I think Josh and Eray have taken the discussion in a different direction than I (and hopefully you) intended. They seem to be arguing the...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
2:46 pm
14887
... Let's see if we can untangle this. Back upthread http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy/message/14880 ... You can always produce an accurate a...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2008
5:41 pm
14888
... Josh, nothing will ever help with either consciousness or intentionality. These are inherently subjective things. That doesn't mean they're non-physical...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
2:36 am
14889
... Disagree. ... Can't follow that at all. ... If it's incoherent then you're saying you can rule out at least parts. ... Have no phobia about it, just...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
3:47 am
14890
... Nice to know but what you suggest would be better? ... Which part has you puzzled? The fact that they are subjective? Or the part that they are physical...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
4:55 am
14891
... <john_j_gagne@...> wrote: Hi John! ... as I ... arguing ... why ... Yes, they turned the discussion into another direction. ... in "strings" ... What do...
FastDado
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
8:28 am
14892
... I doubt if you can find *any* scientists who reject causal explanations, because that wouldn't even be science. Even quantum physics is causal, on a...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
4:35 pm
14893
... Remember when I said these are vary hard problems? Difficult to even talk about because the components are tightly related? This is the first of those...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 3, 2008
4:52 pm
14894
... No, I haven't changed my position. I do believe that QM implies non-causal and I'm still not a fan of such things. But we can't ignore it either. ...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
4:14 am
14895
... Grammar is rules for assembling larger semantic units out of samller ones....
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
5:46 pm
14896
... OK. ... Fooey. My theory is that computation is exactly where you MUST ignore such things, where you DO ignore such things. If that limits computation,...
jrstern
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
5:56 pm
14897
... of ... from ... will ... as I ... occurrence ... samller ones. ... Hi Peter, your explanations sounds ok to me, but do you mean by rules? Where do they...
FastDado
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2008
6:37 pm
14898
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1763154 this is quite interesting. how do you think it happens? i think it's again best explained in a probabilistic...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
12:14 am
14899
... Yes but this covers far too much ground to be of any use. If you were to write out these rules how much storage (in bytes) would you request (assuming we...
John J. Gagne
john_j_gagne
Online Now Send Email
Feb 5, 2008
2:09 am
Messages 14870 - 14899 of 17538   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help