Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ai-philosophy · Philosophical Foundations of AI
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 16722 - 16751 of 17538   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
16722
This is also relevant for ai-philosophy. Comments below, ... I quoted in entire length. Unity of self is without doubt an illusion. All senses themselves are...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2009
2:06 pm
16723
My second reading of the book (Bright Air, Brilliant Fire) is necessarily much slower as I attempt to process all the complex claims expressed by Edelman in...
Stuart W. Mirsky
swmaerske
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2009
2:48 pm
16724
... . Finally, though, I think Edelman oversimplifies and fundamentally misunderstands the computationalist thesis itself, assuming that it can only be the...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
8:37 am
16725
... The issue I had in mind is whether, in programming consciousness: 1) We are aiming to produce a computationally based process that is conscious in and of...
Stuart W. Mirsky
swmaerske
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
12:37 pm
16726
... You are just repeating the same error. A single process is stil going to be made of non-conscious constituents for exactlty the same reason a spreadsheet...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
5:30 pm
16727
... That's why, if #1 is what Edelman thinks the thesis of computationalism is, he is mistaken in his argument against it. Computationalism is, as far as I...
Stuart W. Mirsky
swmaerske
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
7:27 pm
16728
... #2 can't be a better argument, since there is no difference between #1 and d#2. ... It ins't that. It is the thesis that is consc. is essentially a...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
2:00 am
16729
As the little Massey Groves might've said, much better do I like Edelman's detailed work than all his elephant-shite-level theorising. A bit of such detail can...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
6:16 am
16730
... Sorry if I have raised that confusion again. The law of exceptions is about absolute truth, not how many distinct values a variable may have. The...
Jim Whitescarver
jimscarver
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
11:35 am
16731
... Nonsense. And if you mean the contrary, then plain false. You are probably confused on the meaning of "potential infinity". -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate....
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
1:23 pm
16732
... Let's try this again: #1 is one way of thinking about how programming works AND how the computationalist thesis (computational processes running on...
Stuart W. Mirsky
swmaerske
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
1:41 pm
16733
... No it isn;t. Combining computationl processes computationaly yields another computational process. ... You are trying to maintain that there is a...
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
2:58 pm
16734
... "absolute" is a vague term. ... Much, much, much too vague....
Peter D Jones
PeterDJones
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
3:00 pm
16735
... It's about what counts as consciousness, what minds are. ... You are either being deliberately obtuse or just being obtuse. ... Just because you don't...
Stuart W. Mirsky
swmaerske
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
3:38 pm
16736
... Still, it seems to me that Edelman is somewhat unclear (perhaps even confused) about what we mean by "consciousness" (and, thus, what he is aiming to...
Stuart W. Mirsky
swmaerske
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
6:51 pm
16737
I think these particular angels must be tired of their confinement to a pinhead by now. I don't know or care which of you is arguing what. The "computational...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
9:35 pm
16738
Stuart, ... I haven't read his book, so I don't know if he agrees we'll have to decode human consciousness one empirical parameter at a time. ... Until we know...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
10:42 pm
16739
BM> Someone seems to be saying that Edelman and ... .on a massively parallel system can also be done by a ... Only if we are talking about digital,...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
10:49 pm
16740
... confused notion that the thesis ... computation.   Which is ... possible ... PB>Only if we are talking about digital, deterministic computation ... ...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
3:57 am
16741
Well, at any rate, analog, non-deterministic, parallel computers are covered just as well in theory. It doesn't make it another family of device for which we...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
4:01 am
16742
I agree with Bill's nice analysis. There is really an understandable but misleading belief that uncertainties make basic changes in the theory of computation....
Marvin Minsky
minskymarvin
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
5:52 am
16743
Well, at last something we can disagree about! I predict that it will eventually turn out that the higher levels of the brain evolved ways to ignore almost...
Marvin Minsky
minskymarvin
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
6:26 am
16744
MINSKY: "Well, at last something we can disagree about! I predict that it will eventually turn out that the higher levels of the brain evolved ways to ignore...
wdmodlin@...
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
11:23 am
16745
... Oh, I just meant to suggest that we could make mindlike machines work as well as our brains without any need for many petaflops to accomplish things by...
Marvin Minsky
minskymarvin
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
12:18 pm
16746
Minsky: >Our evolution was forced to build our higher cognitive levels by using that early, low level machinery. But I'm convinced that we will much better by...
Donald P. Martin
sciencelover92
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
2:54 pm
16747
Bill, ... Much "computation" in the brain is nondeterministic in the usual formal sense that for many of its functions, given a particular input, the output is...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
4:41 pm
16748
... Sounds scary, doesn't it? I am really curious what would happen, perhaps it's the best thing to do, let it evolve as fast as it can (assuming there is such...
Eray Ozkural
examachine
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
5:39 pm
16749
Peter said: Bill, ... Much "computation" in the brain is nondeterministic in the usual formal sense that for many of its functions, given a particular input,...
Bill Modlin
wdmodlin
Online Now Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
5:49 pm
16750
Bill ... The confusion appears to be yours. The structure of processing units changes from one "computing" instance to the next, much of the process is not...
Peter Brawley
pzbrawl1937
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
7:51 pm
16751
... I don't think this holds. Did we ever had a brain in the exact same internal state in two points in time, to feed it the same particular input? I don't ...
George
fidiasma
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
8:30 pm
Messages 16722 - 16751 of 17538   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help