... the ... Two points: firstly, you seem to be assuming that a test must be a single smoking- gun datum. However, the case *for* continua is not any single ...
... I agree that "I changed my tune". But that's not necessarily a bad thing. I always reserve the right (and extend to others that same right) to reevaluate...
... This might indeed signify something for a mathematician or a philosopher who does not know much physics, as in the terrible Quine-Putnam indispensability...
... I have learnt not to trust my concepts at this level. So I am not dogmatic. For example the expansion of space-time, this happens on a very long time...
I have just started on a paper, I was wondering if I could get some feedback both on the abstract and the general concept of a technical metaphor for a...
... I am being foolish. 1 planck length per planck second is the speed of light by definition. So we have to have things going slower, and to have determinism...
... I agree that we must not be dogmatic. Maybe Zeno was right and space-time is neither continuous nor discrete. Maybe Q is an exact model. Who knows? But...
... The problem is with the assumption of a preferred frame of reference. The speed of light is only a constant within a reference frame. The Planck length...
... Glad you remembered what planck length and planck time mean. :) The problem with the argument above. We don't need to have half planck lengths to have...
... Glider like? Or something else? Have there been any demonstrations of 'particles' that can change speed in CAs? http://finitenature.com/soliton_essay/ This...
... I know this or ... 2001, I started ... was not to ... from ideas of ... worked - I ... But it also ... refered to work that ... results - just ... ...
... What do you mean, Ray? Regards, -- Eray Ozkural (exa), PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo...
It has been suggested that probability is a point of view. With respect to the learning problem, for instance, is there an alternative point of view? Regards, ...
... for ... of ... I take this as a call for more of my bullshit. To begin: We do not talk of truth; truth is for the younger men. The relationship of body and...
... I don't understand what you mean at all. Both are true. It's the information theoretic characterization that is a more accurate description. Regards, -- ...
... From the perspective of "probability is a point of view" we could describe "probability" as a measure (guess) of ignorance; Ignorance of the variables...
... That's where probablities come in. You have kind-of explained why a quantised theory needs to be a probablistic theory. Events need to be able to get...
... Nope, it is constant (better: invariant) in all frames. ... No-one knows how quantum physics combines with realtivity, so no-one knows how the Plank length...
... smoking- ... The relevant question is whether you can do calculations about the universe using only integers. ... You seem to have no evidence againt it. ...
... When I hear this, I demand an example, which shows that mathematics is somehow beyond calculation. In which sense? Regards, -- Eray Ozkural (exa), PhD...
... Sounds like an interesting paper. A classic example of a technical metaphor for a biological system is echolocation: "In the early 1940s the biologists Don...
... Yes. NARS, for example. Check out Pei Wang's web site. One of the papers you can find there is "The Limitation of Bayesianism". On the other hand, you...
... Peter J. (& Michael) I'm just wondering. Why the reluctance to even entertain the idea that the continuum might be false. Yes, yes, yes, it might be...
... Sure you do. First you suggest it be ignored, with no principled assesment at all of the significance of the qualitative change from an information ...
... Hi Michael, Thanks for the insightful comments. If I have the time, I want to learn more about the illusory contours, it was one of the first things I had...