Good Morning,

That's exactly what I determined. The way CF handles
variables as a standard cfm file verses a cfc
component is what threw me off. Thanks for your input,
have a great day.


--- Kevin <chornobyl@...> wrote:

> It looks like the function ones() is not returning
> anything.
>
> It needs a variable to return.
>
> Try this:
>
> <cffunction name="ones">
> <cfargument name="num" type="numeric">
> <cfset var result = "">
> <cfswitch expression="#num#">
> <cfcase value="1"><cfset result = "one"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="2"><cfset result = "two"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="3"><cfset result = "three"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="4"><cfset result = "four"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="5"><cfset result = "five"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="6"><cfset result = "six"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="7"><cfset result = "seven"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="8"><cfset result = "eight"></cfcase>
> <cfcase value="9"><cfset result = "nine"></cfcase>
> </cfswitch>
> <cfreturn result>
> </cffunction>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Keith
> <head_java@...> wrote:
>
> >   Good Morning,
> >
> > I located a cfm program to convert numeric to
> words. 1 = one, 2 =
> > two etc. I'm trying to run this as a ajaxcfc
> component but when I do
> > a cfset results = #ones(thisNum)# (ones is a
> function within the
> > ajaxcfc component) javascript chokes on the
> returned value with
> > Object doesn't support this property or method. I
> think running the
> > function in the cfset is the cause. A shorten
> version of the
> > component is listed below:
> >
> > <cfcomponent extends="/AjaxCFC/ajax">
> >
> > <cffunction name="getLiteralDays">
> > <cfargument name="days" required="yes"
> type="numeric">
> > <cfset thisNum = #arguments.days#>
> > <cfset results = "">
> > <cfif len(thisNum) lt 2>
> > <cfset results = #ones(thisNum)#>
> > </cfif>
> > <cfreturn results />
> > </cffunction>
> >
> > <cffunction name="ones">
> > <cfargument name="num" type="numeric">
> > <cfswitch expression="#num#">
> > <cfcase value="1">one</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="2">two</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="3">three</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="4">four</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="5">five</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="6">six</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="7">seven</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="8">eight</cfcase>
> > <cfcase value="9">nine</cfcase>
> > </cfswitch>
> > </cffunction>
> > </cfcomponent>
> >
> > Not sure how else to do this using ajaxcfc. Any
> suggestion would be
> > great. Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
>



      
________________________________________________________________________________\
____
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total
Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com

Good Morning,

I located a cfm program to convert numeric to words. 1 = one, 2 =
two etc. I'm trying to run this as a ajaxcfc component but when I do
a cfset results = #ones(thisNum)# (ones is a function within the
ajaxcfc component) javascript chokes on the returned value with
Object doesn't support this property or method. I think running the
function in the cfset is the cause. A shorten version of the
component is listed below:

<cfcomponent extends="/AjaxCFC/ajax">

<cffunction name="getLiteralDays">
<cfargument name="days" required="yes" type="numeric">
<cfset thisNum = #arguments.days#>
<cfset results = "">
<cfif len(thisNum) lt 2>
     <cfset results = #ones(thisNum)#>
</cfif>
<cfreturn results />
</cffunction>

<cffunction name="ones">
	 <cfargument name="num" type="numeric">
	 <cfswitch expression="#num#">
		 <cfcase value="1">one</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="2">two</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="3">three</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="4">four</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="5">five</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="6">six</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="7">seven</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="8">eight</cfcase>
		 <cfcase value="9">nine</cfcase>
	 </cfswitch>
</cffunction>
</cfcomponent>

Not sure how else to do this using ajaxcfc. Any suggestion would be
great. Thanks.

I will be out of the office starting  03/12/2008 and will not return until
03/18/2008.

I will respond to your message when I return.
If your issue is urgent, you may want to cont
act the Seagate IT HelpDesk,
Or my Boss, Leo Sanchez - 405-324-3475

PHONE: (405)324-3225
WEB:    http://my.seagate.com/tibco/helpdesk

Thanks
John McDonald

New to js and wanted to know what's the best way to reuse an ajaxcfc
request if this possible.  I want to setup a page with  multiple
selects and detail table.  Once the first select/option is selected a
call is made to populate the second which also populates a table.

I'm guess I could create a var which holds the .AjaxCFC function.  I
just don't know the proper syntax to do so and be able to pass url,
method, data and success.

Hope this makes sense. Can someone please help?

JS.

Worked for me.  Thanks for clearing it up.  I copied the snippet from
your blog early on but forgot to include cfjs.  I was hung up trying
to perform the loop via jquery once my first attempt failed so I tried
to get just one row.  Your explanation on array notation worked too.

Once again, thanks!


--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, Chris Jordan <cjordan@...> wrote:
>
> Man... the formatting on that post just *did not* work out. Yikes!
Sorry.
>
> Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Jordan" <cjordan@...>
> To: ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 3:15:00 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
> Subject: Re: [ajaxcfc] jquery + AjaxCFC: retrieving data rows
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How can I not respond? Thanks for the kind words on the tutorials. I
wish they were a little better. :o)
>
> To access particular rows in your dataset (which is probably JSON
encoded), you need to use array notation. This concept of accessing
query results using array notation can also be used inside ColdFusion
so it's actually not too different.
>
> So in your example you've got r.recordcount and r.columnlist and
those hold what you expect. The only thing left is r.data. This holds
your actual data and it's like a struct of arrays, so you would access
the data like this:
>
> r.data.columnname[index]
>
> for instance if you wanted to loop over your dataset (let's call it
myQuery instead of r) like you would in CF you'd do something like this:
>
> 1 var table = "" ;
> 2 table += " <table> " ;
> 3 for(i = 0; i < myQuery.recordcount; i++){ // here we're looping
once for every record
> 4 table += " <tr> "
> 5 for(n = 1; n <= $ .ListLen(myQuery.columnlist); n++){ // once for
every field
> 6 fieldname = $.ListGetAt(myQuery.columnlist, n);
> 7 table += " <td> " + myQuery.data[fieldname][i] + " </td> " ;
> &n bsp;8 }
> 9 table += " </tr> " ;
> 10 }
> 11 table += " </table> " ;
>
> If this looks familiar, it's because I stole it from my own
tutorial. In the above example I'm using CFJS to get $.ListLen() and
$.ListGetAt()
>
> Does this help? If not, let me know exactly what's causing you to
scratch your head, and I'll attempt to help out. :o)
>
> If you curious about the syntax on line 7 where it says:
> myQuery.data[fieldname][i]
>
> An object in JavaScript (an a query object in ColdFusion) can be
access in this way when the member key (the bit that would normally
come after the dot) is variable. If field name weren't variable I'd
say myQuery.data.FirstName[i] or myQuery.data.FirstName[0] . The
example above is very dynamic whereas the two little snippets just
here were much more static calling specifically to find out what value
is in the 'FirstName' field for the first record.
>
> I hope I don't sound like I'm talking down to you at all. that's not
my intention. Let me know if you need any more help or clarification! :o)
>
> Chris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "josegura93" < josegura@... >
> To: ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 2:37:41 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
> Subject: [ajaxcfc] jquery + AjaxCFC: retrieving data rows
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> First and foremost I want to thank Chris Jordan for his tutorials.
>
> I was able to perform a dump of my query and extract recordcount and
> columnlist. What I don't know is how to extract rows. I'm not clear
> on how to access say row 0 from (r) callback.
>
> This is what I know:
> ...
> success: function(r){
> var rc = r.recordcount;
> var cl = r.columnlist;
> $('#myInfo').append(rc + "<br>" + cl);
>
> }
> ...
> <div id="myInfo"></div>
>
> Eventually I would like to use ingrid or jqGrid but I can't go forward
> without knowing the above.
>
> Thanks.
>

First and foremost I want to thank Chris Jordan for his tutorials.

I was able to perform a dump of my query and extract recordcount and
columnlist.  What I don't know is how to extract rows.  I'm not clear
on how to access say row 0 from (r) callback.

This is what I know:
...
success: function(r){
		 var rc = r.recordcount;
		 var cl = r.columnlist;
		 $('#myInfo').append(rc + "<br>" + cl);

	 }
...
<div id="myInfo"></div>

Eventually I would like to use ingrid or jqGrid but I can't go forward
without knowing the above.

Thanks.

--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "Keith" <head_java@...> wrote:
>
> Solution by geneaiello123@...,
>
>
> Yes you can. _ajaxConfig is a comma delimited list.
>
> eg. _ajaxConfig =
> {'UserAjaxCFC':'/cfcs/userAjax.cfc','departmentCFC':'/cfcs/department
> .cfc','accountAjaxCFC':'/cfcs/accountAjax.cfc','_jsscriptFolder':'/js
> '};
>
> Tested and works. Thanks.
>
>

Cheers!

Solution by geneaiello123@...,


Yes you can. _ajaxConfig is a comma delimited list.

eg. _ajaxConfig =
{'UserAjaxCFC':'/cfcs/userAjax.cfc','departmentCFC':'/cfcs/department
.cfc','accountAjaxCFC':'/cfcs/accountAjax.cfc','_jsscriptFolder':'/js
'};

Tested and works. Thanks.


--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "Keith" <head_java@...> wrote:
>
> Not sure if anyone stills uses or monitors this group, but I'm
asking
> anyway. Have written many... ajaxcfc programs always using the
same
> CFC file defined in the ajaxcfc parameter _ajaxConfig. Now this
CFC is
> getting very large. Question: Can I access two different CFC's in
the
> same program (some how changing the parameter _ajaxConfig, which
does
> not work) ? I could call the CFC and then just INVOKE a different
> function, but trying to avoid this solution. Thanks
>

--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "Keith" <head_java@...> wrote:
>
> Not sure if anyone stills uses or monitors this group, but I'm asking
> anyway. Have written many... ajaxcfc programs always using the same
> CFC file defined in the ajaxcfc parameter _ajaxConfig. Now this CFC
is
> getting very large. Question: Can I access two different CFC's in the
> same program (some how changing the parameter _ajaxConfig, which does
> not work) ? I could call the CFC and then just INVOKE a different
> function, but trying to avoid this solution. Thanks
>

I'm also interested in an answer to this question.

I have programmed a web application which uses a 2000 line page with a
4000 line page CFC. It'd be nice to split this up, for hopefully
performance benefits and organisation.

Regards, Dan

Not sure if anyone stills uses or monitors this group, but I'm asking
anyway. Have written many... ajaxcfc programs always using the same
CFC file defined in the ajaxcfc parameter _ajaxConfig. Now this CFC is
getting very large. Question: Can I access two different CFC's in the
same program (some how changing the parameter _ajaxConfig, which does
not work) ? I could call the CFC and then just INVOKE a different
function, but trying to avoid this solution. Thanks

I would recommend, updating to the latest AjaxCFC, if you can. (i.e.
you are not already using an older version of AjaxCFC in other
places.)

If you can not upgrade, then the Previous version, used to require
you to defined a cfargument, for the structure you were passing. So
in your case, You only arguemnt should be...
<cfargument name="stcMyForm" type="struct" required="yes">

... then you would reference like ...

arguments.stcMyForm.txtFirstname

try that.


--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "programmerneo" <programmer_neo@...>
wrote:
>
> Its pretty easy, and it took me a few tries to figure this out.
> (Since the AjaxCFC functionality has changed several times, in each
> incarnation of it. And the documentation has yet to be updated to
> reflect the changes.)
>
> In your CFC function, you do NOT need any cfarguments, to capture
the
> FORM, for some reason, all the FORM elements, are automatically put
> into the ARGUMENTS scope... so just reference each element by their
> name on the form. So if you have a textbox called txtFirstname...
you
> would refernce it in your cfc like ...  arguments.txtFirstname
>
> I rarely pass less than 2-3 parameters into a function, so I always
> pass them in, in a Structure (By first creating a structure in
> javascript). Or else, I am always passing in the FORM (By first,
> serializing it. BTW, You MUST always serialize a FORM first).
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> --- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, Farah Omar <ofarah24@> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your response. How can I access the form variables
> once I am inside 'myFunction'?
> >
> > programmerneo <programmer_neo@> wrote:          To pass your
> FORM, you'll just need to serialize it...
> >
> > DWREngine._execute
> (_ajaxConfig.myAjaxCFC,null,'myFunction',DWRUtil.serializeForm
> (docForm),responseMyFunction);
> >
> > ... where docForm, is your document.Form[0].
> >
> > --- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many
> parameters
> > > you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older
> messages to
> > > find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
> > >
> > > function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic,
> specificDate,
> > > fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department,
> affiliation)
> > > {
> > > DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> > > null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic,
> specificDate,
> > > fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> > > getRecordsResult);
> > > }
> > >
> > > If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't
> seem to
> > > getting passed on. I can't read its value.
> > >
> > > Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo!
Mobile.
> Try it now.
> >
>

Its pretty easy, and it took me a few tries to figure this out.
(Since the AjaxCFC functionality has changed several times, in each
incarnation of it. And the documentation has yet to be updated to
reflect the changes.)

In your CFC function, you do NOT need any cfarguments, to capture the
FORM, for some reason, all the FORM elements, are automatically put
into the ARGUMENTS scope... so just reference each element by their
name on the form. So if you have a textbox called txtFirstname... you
would refernce it in your cfc like ...  arguments.txtFirstname

I rarely pass less than 2-3 parameters into a function, so I always
pass them in, in a Structure (By first creating a structure in
javascript). Or else, I am always passing in the FORM (By first,
serializing it. BTW, You MUST always serialize a FORM first).

Hope this helps.



--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, Farah Omar <ofarah24@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your response. How can I access the form variables
once I am inside 'myFunction'?
>
> programmerneo <programmer_neo@...> wrote:          To pass your
FORM, you'll just need to serialize it...
>
> DWREngine._execute
(_ajaxConfig.myAjaxCFC,null,'myFunction',DWRUtil.serializeForm
(docForm),responseMyFunction);
>
> ... where docForm, is your document.Form[0].
>
> --- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@> wrote:
> >
> > I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many
parameters
> > you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older
messages to
> > find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
> >
> > function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic,
specificDate,
> > fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department,
affiliation)
> > {
> > DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> > null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic,
specificDate,
> > fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> > getRecordsResult);
> > }
> >
> > If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't
seem to
> > getting passed on. I can't read its value.
> >
> > Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.
Try it now.
>

To pass your FORM, you'll just need to serialize it...

DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig.myAjaxCFC,null,'myFunction',DWRUtil.serializeForm(docForm),responseMyFunction);

... where docForm, is your document.Form[0].

--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@...> wrote:
>
> I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many parameters
> you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older messages to
> find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
>
> function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department, affiliation)
> {
> DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> getRecordsResult);
> }
>
> If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't seem to
> getting passed on. I can't read its value.
>
> Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
>

To pass your FORM, you'll just need to serialize it...

DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig.myAjaxCFC,null,'myFunction',DWRUtil.serializeForm\
(docForm),responseMyFunction);

... where docForm, is your document.Form[0].


--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@...> wrote:
>
> I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many parameters
> you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older messages to
> find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
>
> function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department, affiliation)
> {
>  DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> getRecordsResult);
> }
>
> If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't seem to
> getting passed on. I can't read its value.
>
> Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
>

Thanks for the reply. Yes, some examples will help.

Thank you/

--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "Keith" <head_java@...> wrote:
>
> Good Afternoon,
>
> That is correct, I had the same issue, only 10 parameters. Solution
> is to pass a WDDX recordset, and you will not have any limits. If
> you need me to explain WDDX and need examples let me know. lol
>
> --- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@> wrote:
> >
> > I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many
> parameters
> > you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older
> messages to
> > find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
> >
> > function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic,
> specificDate,
> > fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department,
> affiliation)
> > {
> >  DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> > null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic,
> specificDate,
> > fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> > getRecordsResult);
> > }
> >
> > If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't
seem
> to
> > getting passed on. I can't read its value.
> >
> > Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
> >
>

Just pass all you parameters in a structure. For example just pass the
whole FORM, to your cfc.


--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@...> wrote:
>
> I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many parameters
> you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older messages to
> find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
>
> function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department, affiliation)
> {
>  DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> getRecordsResult);
> }
>
> If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't seem to
> getting passed on. I can't read its value.
>
> Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
>

Good Afternoon,

That is correct, I had the same issue, only 10 parameters. Solution
is to pass a WDDX recordset, and you will not have any limits. If
you need me to explain WDDX and need examples let me know. lol

--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "ofarah24" <ofarah24@...> wrote:
>
> I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many
parameters
> you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older
messages to
> find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:
>
> function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic,
specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department,
affiliation)
> {
>  DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
> null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic,
specificDate,
> fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
> getRecordsResult);
> }
>
> If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't seem
to
> getting passed on. I can't read its value.
>
> Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?
>

I remember reading that may be there is a limit on how many parameters
you can pass to a function. I tried looking into the older messages to
find it but I had no luck. Here is my code:

function searchRecords(form,clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
fromDate, toDate, serviceType,transactionID, department, affiliation)
{
	 DWREngine._execute(_ajaxConfig._cfscriptLocation,
null, 'getRecords',form, clientName, staffName, topic, specificDate,
fromDate, toDate, serviceType, transactionID, affiliation,
getRecordsResult);
}

If I add a 11th value to the DWREngine._execute(), it doesn't seem to
getting passed on. I can't read its value.

Dose this mean that I can only pass 10 parameters?

Aaron Rouse said --

>One thing that I took note off from your blog postings was the minor
>mentioning of ingrid, that is something I have bookmarked for possible
>future use for when users need to search on records in other tables to
>create an entry in bridging tables.  The current solution for that does
page
>reloads(click to add, go to search page, do search, select records,
submit,
>back on the page you started on with  HTML grid filled with related
records
>that were selected), works well enough but is several years old and
just be
>nice to retire it with something more user friendly.

While I'm not using inGrid with AjaxCFC, I am using it with Cold Fusion
8 and jQuery.

I got it working, but I had to rewrite some of the core inGrid JS files
for it to cooperate with CF 8's way of returning JSON values. So, I
haven't used it multiple places in my application yet, but I'm expecting
that to be difficult.

--
Rob

Did you ever figure this out?  I run into the same problem.

Bryan
--- In ajaxcfc@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Rouse" <aaron.rouse@...> wrote:
>
> I was trying to run the examples that come with the latest Alpha of
AjaxCFC
> with jQuery and get an error with the first DWRCompatibility.query
example(
> Index.cfm of that directory).  The error pops up with a JS
confirmation box
> about a critical error happening when try the "Client Side" box and
when I
> click ok to view the error it states:
>
>
__json__:{"recordcount":1,"columnlist":"fname,id,lname,location,phone","data":{"\
fname":["Rob"],"id":[1],"lname":["Gonda"],"location":["Florida"],"phone":["954-5\
55-5555"]}}
>
> Guess first thing I ought to ask is should the example work or have the
> examples not been finished?
>
> The "Server Side" example works.
>
> Ultimately I am hoping to use it to display unique property records
with a
> radio button selection.  I have done this with the old version of
AjaxCFC
> but when that solution would get the form submitted the form
elements would
> not show up on the action page if using FireFox so was hoping maybe
to have
> better luck with jQuery in the mix.
>
> --
> Aaron Rouse
> http://www.happyhacker.com/
>